LOGIN | Register
Cooperation
Alpha Insights景顺长城基金2026年度投资策略会
文章语言:
EN
Share
Minutes
原文
会议摘要
Multiple fund managers shared strategies for fixed income products management, equity investment, and team collaboration, emphasizing asset allocation and long-term control of drawdowns to achieve absolute returns. They discussed the outlook for Chinese enterprise development, electric power equipment, and non-ferrous metals industries, as well as the investment value of high dividend-paying state-owned enterprises, technology giants, and AI assets in Hong Kong and A-share markets. Fixed income products are attracting attention due to stable low volatility, with the convertible bond market as a high Sharpe ratio investment tool. In 2026, strategies need to balance risk control and returns, and adjust asset allocation flexibly to adapt to market changes. The demand for computing power in the AI field is growing, with strategies for industry supply chain configuration focusing on long-term growth and reasonable valuation. The technology investment forum is optimistic about the prospects of AI computing power and applications, and suggests focusing on computing power infrastructure, edge applications, and robotics in specific segments.
会议速览
Investment Opportunities in the Age of AI: Seizing the Growth Dividend ahead of Others.
Discussing the investment opportunities in the AI era, emphasizing the importance of staying ahead, exploring changes in computing power, model innovation, and application scenarios, members of the ChinaAMC technology legion share deep industry insights and global perspectives, unlocking the secrets of AI investment together.
Rising Demand for Computing Power: Future Prospects for Models, Income, and Supply Chains.
Discussed the continuous growth of computing power demand, pointing out that the key drivers are model training, inference demand, and supply chain (especially TSMC's capital expenditure). It is expected that computing power demand will continue to expand in the coming years, particularly with a significant increase in inference demand. At the same time, TSMC's high capital expenditure and optimistic demand forecasts inject confidence into the AI industry.
Computing power parity and Skin Law: AI investment new trends and future prospects
After discussing the DeepSick incident in early 2025, overseas investors' interest in investing in Chinese AI has increased, as well as the controversy over equal rights to computational power and the Skin Law. While some believe that computational power optimization can make up for the shortage of computational power, supporters of the Skin Law argue that model capabilities improve with increasing computational resources. Expert opinions vary, but engineering optimization and computational investment are not in conflict. Short-term computational spending is highly certain, and the long-term industry chain is in the exploration stage.
Computing power investment: Analysis of subdivided tracks and trends in value volume inflation.
The discussion focuses on the field of computing power, especially the sub-sectors of overseas and domestic, training and inference computing power. It emphasizes the value inflation of optical communication and storage demands in the multi-modal training paradigm, as well as the market potential of ASIC and CPU in the inference direction. It points out that the growth in AI demand may drive the upstream bulk electronic goods from oversupply to supply-demand balance, providing investors with mid-term certainty and excess return opportunities.
Evolution of Computing Power Demand: From Training to Inference to Agent-based AI
The discussion focused on the changing trend of the demand for computing power, shifting from training to inference as the main focus by 2025, as well as the further increase in computing power demand for future agent-based AI and physical world AI. Before 2025, 70% of China's computing power market was used for training, while 30% was used for inference. After 2025, there is a significant increase in demand for inference, with global demand for inference computing power reaching 3-4 times that of training demand. It is predicted that starting in 2026, there will be a demand for agent-based AI, and in the next 3-4 years, the demand for training in physical world AI will significantly increase, placing higher requirements on computing infrastructure.
How can actively managed funds outperform passive indices in the field of AI computing power?
It discussed that in the AI computing power field, active funds can surpass passive indexes by selecting leading companies, diversifying investment portfolios, and positioning themselves in emerging supply chain opportunities. It emphasized the advantage of top companies during steep technology investment curves, as well as the lack of deep understanding of the technology sector by retail customers, pointing out that active funds have great potential in capturing early supply chain opportunities.
Proactive management opportunities and AI investment disputes in the rapidly changing technology industry.
Discussed the technology industry's friendliness towards active fund managers due to rapid changes, as well as the controversy of AI investing stemming from concerns about the investment relationship between tech giants and large model giants, emphasizing the value of active management in responding to industry changes and creating excess returns.
AI Investment Bubble and Giant Monopoly: Market Structure under the Ticket of Hundreds of Billions of US Dollars.
The dialogue explored the current investment situation in the field of AI, pointing out that the high investment threshold has left only a few giants in the market to choose from, such as OpenAI. These companies have invested heavily in model and chip development, leading to a trend of monopolization. As a result, investment institutions can only channel funds to these large-scale companies that have already established themselves in the industry.
Resource competition and risk considerations under the wave of AI investment
The dialogue thoroughly discussed the complexity of resource acquisition and risk assessment in the AI investment boom, pointing out that the progress of AI is closely related to control over resources, with overseas companies leading in model iteration due to their computational power advantage. Investment not only involves chips, but also requires advance locking of resources such as wafer fabs and electricity, otherwise competitiveness will be lost. Companies like Meta maintain a proactive attitude, emphasizing that the risk of insufficient investment is greater than not investing at all, highlighting that this round of investment paradigm is different from the past, with significant upfront investment.
Transformation of AI investment paradigm: From light assets to heavy assets and cross-industry impact.
The conversation discussed the differences between AI investment and historical railway investment, emphasizing the heavy asset nature of AI investment and its cross-industry impact, such as the strong demand in energy, electricity, and metal industries. It pointed out the paradigm shift in AI investment and its extensive influence on upstream and downstream industries.
New changes in power and metal market supply and demand under the drive of AI
The dialogue delved into the supply and demand changes in the electricity and metal markets driven by AI. It pointed out the sharp increase in the electricity demand of data centers, and the rising demand for metals such as copper and aluminum. However, the electricity consumption in aluminum production may lead to supply and demand contradictions. The mismatch between grid investments and the computing power investments of internet giants has become apparent, indicating that the future energy market will face new challenges and investment opportunities.
Competition and Future Evolution Trends of Large Model: Online Learning and Intelligent Agents.
The discussion focuses on the competition landscape of large models and future evolution, emphasizing online learning and intelligent agents (from response to action) as key trends. Looking forward to the NVIDIA GB series models, competition among major manufacturers is fierce, and model capabilities are accelerating. Future models will achieve personalized online learning, adjust in real time to meet individual needs.
Diversification of new trends and evaluation standards in the development of AI models in 2023.
This year, the evaluation standards for AI models will become more diverse and complex, focusing on specific task-solving capabilities, cost-effectiveness, and speed. Overseas models are making efforts in agent applications, business-side solutions, and full memory functions, while domestic models are expected to make progress in long-context reasoning and full-modal pre-training, improving overall application levels and consumer awareness.
Large-scale ecological differentiation and innovation paths of small and medium enterprises
It is discussed that the future large model ecosystem will differentiate into two separate fields: basic models and vertical small models. The competition threshold in the basic model field is high, and in the end, there may only be 7 to 8 manufacturers left, each with unique advantages in specific areas. Small and medium-sized enterprises can use existing large models as a foundation to develop vertical applications, reducing research and development costs and improving efficiency.
Discussion on the current status and future investment opportunities of AI applications.
Discussed the current application status of AI in the consumer and business ends, predicting that 2026 will be an important year for changes in the business end, as AI will gradually replace manual labor and increase labor productivity. In terms of investment direction, it is believed that large model companies have long-term investment value, but holds a reserved attitude towards investing in Chinese A-share computer media industry, as it may be negatively affected by AI investments.
2026 Technology Trends Forecast: Computing power infrastructure and edge applications become the focus.
The discussion focuses on the direction of technological development in 2026, emphasizing the scarcity and high growth potential of computing power infrastructure in the first half of the year, as well as the market reversal that may be brought by AI applications on the edge in the second half of the year. Robot technology is seen as a long-term promising direction, and the potential of internet giants in empowering enterprise processes with AI is also mentioned. The overall view is that short-term computing power and long-term edge intelligence are worth paying attention to in the technology field.
Exploring Investment Strategies and Future Market Opportunities in the AI Era.
Under the market trend led by AI, several fund managers shared their investment philosophies and strategies. They emphasized the importance of balanced allocation, growth investment, technological prosperity, and cyclical growth. At the same time, they discussed how to find the next investment hotspot in the differentiated market styles, in order to achieve long-term stable returns.
A-shares spring market is on fire: the conversion of new and old kinetic energy and changes in market structure.
The reasons for the recent strong spring market in A-shares were discussed, pointing out that macroeconomic changes have led to a weakening of investment drive, with monetary cycles and liquidity becoming the main influencing factors. Changes in market structure have prompted investors to focus on long-term growth potential, leading to an increase in risk appetite and a decrease in market risks. It was emphasized to look for structural opportunities in the transition between old and new forces, and to focus on building capabilities rather than short-term gains.
Technology Growth Fund Managers Share Hotspot Capture and NAV Explosion Strategy
The dialogue focuses on how technology growth fund managers can find hotspots and maintain composure in a rapidly rotating market to achieve explosive growth in net worth. The sharer believes that seizing the opportunity of ample macro liquidity and deepening investment in high-boom industries such as semiconductors and defense is crucial. At the same time, they point out that active funds prefer areas with obvious industrial policies and mapping effects, such as commercial aerospace, but emphasize the importance of long-term industry cultivation rather than short-term speculation.
Insights and strategies for fund managers to deal with the spring market frenzy
The conversation discussed how fund managers should adjust their mentality during the spring volatile market, adhere to deepening their own capabilities, seize opportunities, and avoid blindly following hotspots. It emphasized the importance of staying focused and seizing opportunities in their areas of expertise.
China is rapidly expanding its overseas manufacturing in 2026: focusing on high-quality capital goods from Europe and America and the machinery and automotive industries in South America.
The dialogue delves into the investment opportunities in the field of offshore manufacturing in 2026, emphasizing the long-term trend and potential of China's manufacturing industry going global. It points out that from inverter to Lufeng's leading case, it indicates that it takes 5-10 years for offshore layout to bear fruit, and the performance and return on investment trends are relatively certain. In the next two years, European and American capital goods are promising, especially with the high elasticity of the European economy, the reshoring of the manufacturing industry in the United States, and the advancement of AI infrastructure; there is strong demand in the machinery and automotive industries in South America, especially in the car and motorcycle markets. Summarizing, the recommendation is to focus on China's advantageous industries, such as telecommunications equipment and automotive industry.
Globalization Enterprises' Risk Assessment and Valuation Paradigm Shift in Going Overseas
Discussed the protectionism, market compliance, and cultural customs challenges faced by enterprises going global, and proposed evaluating risks through methods such as asset attribute analysis, investment in geopolitically friendly regions, and selecting globally distributed enterprises. Emphasized that Chinese enterprises, in the process of going global, can gradually transform from traditional cyclical companies to globalized platform companies through business diversification and country diversification. With the systematic change in valuation paradigms, this will enhance risk resistance and long-term growth potential.
Electric Power Equipment and Nonferrous Metal Industry: Opportunities of Demand Growth and Technological Progress
The dialogue discussed the opportunities for the power equipment and non-ferrous metal industries in the current market environment. The certainty of growing power demand, especially the high demand for electricity from AI, and the development of energy storage technology, bring new opportunities to the power equipment industry. The non-ferrous metal industry, especially rare metals, is expected to have significant growth potential in the future, influenced by factors such as interest rates, geopolitics, and demand. Technological advancement and resource scarcity are key factors driving industry development.
Gold and Nonferrous Metal Investment Strategy: Dual Consideration of Financial Properties and Resource Expansion.
The investment prospects of gold and other precious metals were discussed, pointing out that although gold has value as a store of wealth, it does not generate interest. Its investment appeal partly comes from the resource expansion and mergers and acquisitions activities of related companies. The active resource acquisition of Chinese mining companies in Africa, South America, and other regions has driven the growth of these companies. Currently, gold stocks have low valuations and are considered to have investment value, but caution is needed regarding the potential interest rate hike by the Federal Reserve, which could have a negative impact on the gold and commodity markets.
Overseas computing power and the semiconductor industry: Prospects for cyclical storage and growth technologies.
Discussed the development trends of the semiconductor industry under the background of overseas computing power, with a focus on the strong cyclicality and growth technology direction of periodic storage (such as HBM, HBF) and advanced packaging, optical-electrical replacement technology. Based on the advancement of AI models and the increasing storage demand, new technologies such as HBF will bring new opportunities; as Moore's Law approaches its limit, heterogeneous packaging and optical technology have become alternative solutions.
Exploring investment strategies in Hong Kong stocks: Focus on high-dividend state-owned enterprises and technology giants.
Discussed the characteristics of the Hong Kong stock market, including its high level of institutionalization and large liquidity fluctuations, and suggested holding for the long term when the market is undervalued. Emphasized the value of high-dividend state-owned enterprises as stabilizers of volatility, as well as the resilient potential of tech giants in the recovery of domestic demand. Also pointed out that scarce assets, such as companies listed only in the Hong Kong stock market, are worth special attention, and that position control should be cautious to avoid psychological pressure from the performance gap with A-shares.
Fixed income investment strategy in 2026: Balance between stocks and bonds and overseas risks.
The discussion focuses on fixed income investment strategy for the year 2026, analyzes trends in the stock and bond markets, emphasizes overseas volatility risks, suggests timely balancing of stock and bond allocations, and overall outlook is cautiously neutral.
Bond market analysis and fixed income investment strategy outlook
The conversation revolves around the investment strategy of the bond market and fixed income products, analyzing the trend of bond yields under the current stable economic operation. It is pointed out that there is limited upward space for bond yields, but overall risk is controllable. It is expected that the return on bond investment this year will be between 2% and 3%, emphasizing the importance of bonds in asset allocation and investment opportunities in a stable economic environment.
Exploration of bond and equity market allocation strategies: supply and demand structure and the impact of loose policies
Discussed the changes in the supply and demand structure of the bond market, pointing out a shortage of short-term bonds and an excess of long-term bonds, and recommending the pursuit of high coupon rates within the risk tolerance range. For the equity market, based on historical data and the current loose policy environment, it is expected to perform well, with an emphasis on focusing on EPS growth.
Analysis of long-term excess returns and macro trends in the colored industry.
The dialogue delved into the excess returns performance of the non-ferrous industry in the past three years and the macro trend changes behind it, pointing out that after the epidemic, overseas countries have entered an era of large fiscal dominance, with a rise in resource populism, restructuring of demand, and other factors at play, leading to new growth opportunities for the non-ferrous industry. Currently, industry valuations have not reached bubble levels, but caution is needed in the face of the tactical adjustment risk that may arise from inflation pressure in the future.
In-depth analysis of the convertible bond market: opportunities and risks under high valuations
The characteristics of the convertible bond market were discussed, pointing out its strong correlation with the stock market, usually manifesting as a 0.5 point increase in convertible bond prices for every 1 point increase in the stock market. Recently, due to enhanced liquidity, the elasticity coefficient of convertible bonds has increased, but this is unrelated to valuation, and is more influenced by trading volume, activity, and liquidity. The convertible bond market is not an independent asset and its performance mainly reflects stock market expectations. In the current market environment, it is becoming more difficult to achieve absolute returns.
High Sharpe ratio of convertible bond assets and their strategic value
Discussed the characteristics of convertible bonds as high Sharpe ratio assets, including their annualized return of 7-8%, low drawdown, high certainty and resilient returns. The high Sharpe ratio of convertible bonds comes from strong conversion demand, increased conversion probability with high liquidity, and a natural exit mechanism from the short remaining term. These factors make convertible bonds have good protection in market setbacks and are assets with excellent historical performance, deserving strategic attention.
In-depth discussion on the reasonableness of convertible bond valuation and fixed-income weighted equity asset investment strategy.
Discussed the reasonableness of the valuation of convertible bonds, pointing out that the current valuation of convertible bonds reflects asset scarcity and liquidity expectations, making them suitable for relative returns. For equity assets in fixed-income products, we are optimistic about AI and the non-ferrous industry, especially new AI computing power technologies, domestic supply chains, large-scale models deployed in internet giants and the robotics industry. We also pay attention to the main themes of rising storage prices, North American power shortages, disruptions in the supply of minor metals and new technologies such as solid-state batteries. In addition, we are bullish on non-banking, consumer companies and export chain companies with improving bottom-line conditions, as well as the coal industry with a high success rate, while commercial aerospace valuations are expensive.
Industry Rotation and Style Selection: A Comprehensive Analysis based on Economic Conditions, Valuations, and Policies.
The core of industry rotation and style selection lies in forecasting and tracking industry prosperity, while also emphasizing valuation levels, chip structure, and policy orientation. Through frequent internal reviews and exchanges with professional researchers, capturing investment opportunities in industry bottom reversals, emphasizing the importance of diligence and comprehensive research.
Fixed Income Plus product drawdown control and yield balance strategy sharing.
Discussed the investment strategy of fixed income products in low-risk preferences, emphasized the importance of strict drawdown control and return balance, and shared the methodology of how to achieve good returns while controlling volatility.
Exploration of long-term investment methods and asset allocation strategies in the fixed income plus field.
In the fixed income plus field, the focus is on building long-term effective investment methods, emphasizing the importance of asset allocation, and pursuing products with low volatility and high Sharpe ratios. By recognizing the underlying asset construction method, paying attention to the interrelationship between assets and buying costs, stable investments can be achieved. However, asset allocation may fail in specific extreme environments and should be carefully managed.
Investment Strategy: The Balance Between Long-Term Trends and Short-Term Volatility
The discussion focused on how to balance long-term patterns and short-term fluctuations in investment, emphasizing the importance of "not doing what you don't understand" and asset allocation. By using the analogy of a candle market, it illustrated the importance of participating in the market within one's own ability circle, while also pointing out the need to increase awareness of areas with high concentration of funds, participate with risk awareness, and thus achieve low volatility and high Sharpe ratio investment products.
Investment Strategy and Drawdown Control: The Art of Adhering to the System and Making Precise Choices.
Discussed the importance of adhering to personal methodologies and systems in the investment process, as well as how to accurately select and choose from numerous market opportunities to increase the success rate of selections and achieve stable income. Particularly mentioned is the effective control of drawdowns and volatility through strategies in equity products, in order to achieve good risk-adjusted returns.
Fund manager describes in detail the withdrawal control strategy for fixed income products: asset allocation, equity investment, and bond management.
The conversation focuses on how fund managers can control drawdowns in fixed income products, emphasizing the asset allocation of major categories, equities valuation management, and bond investment strategies. By strictly managing positions, adjusting asset allocations in a timely manner, and anticipating market conditions to reduce the volatility of individual assets, the aim is to construct a low-volatility investment portfolio and effectively deal with market black swan events.
Differences in portfolio construction between secondary bond funds and equity funds, and matching strategies with customer demands.
Discussed the differences in portfolio construction between secondary bond funds and equity funds, emphasizing that while both pursue long-term compounding, based on product positioning and client risk preferences, secondary bond funds are more focused on stability and conservatism to meet the needs of clients seeking stable income, while equity funds tend to lean towards aggressive investment strategies.
Team Collaboration and Cross-Department Cooperation: Building the Cornerstone for Excellent Investment Performance.
The dialogue delved deep into the application of team collaboration and cross-department cooperation in the investment field, emphasizing the importance of fund managers leveraging their individual strengths and learning from each other, as well as the role of company systems in encouraging and supporting to enhance the overall performance of the team. By creating an open, communicative, and sharing atmosphere, ensuring that each member can grow and realize their self-worth in cooperation, collectively responding to market fluctuations and providing long-term stable investment returns.
How to avoid fixed income turning into reduced fixed income: asset allocation and professional investment strategies
Discussed in the current market environment, how to ensure that fixed income products do not transition from fixed income to reduced income through asset allocation and professional investment strategies. Emphasized the importance of adhering to asset allocation methodology, purchasing relatively cheap assets, expanding and deepening knowledge breadth, and the importance of avoiding chasing highs and selling lows.
Fixed income and investment strategy in 2026: multi-asset allocation and stable returns.
The discussion focuses on the fixed income plus investment strategy for 2026, emphasizing the methodology of building stable income through mastering various asset classes such as bonds, convertible bonds, and stocks. Strategies for maintaining positions and controlling drawdowns in a bear market, as well as practical cases of achieving positive returns through different asset combinations, were shared. The team is confident and committed to completing the fixed income plus investment task through the research platform of Jingshun Changcheng, providing a full range of investment products from low volatility to high volatility, aiming to draw a investment blueprint for investors in 2026 and find paths to excess returns.
要点回答
Q:In the AI era, how to stay one step ahead and grasp investment opportunities has become a core topic of attention?
A:We focus on investment opportunities in the growth of AI core technology through three roundtable forums, with the first forum delving into investment strategies to seize the opportunities in the AI era. The forum will be hosted by Mr. Zong Jianshu, Chief Analyst of Computer at Changjiang Securities, and will invite several fund managers from China Asset Management Co., Ltd. who are known for their expertise in technology growth and have conducted in-depth research and insights into the AI industry chain.
Q:What is the market's attitude towards the changing trend of computing power demand in the AI industry and its commercial prospects?
A:There is skepticism in the market regarding the authenticity of the demand for AI and the prospects for commercial implementation. However, the AI industry continues to develop and bring investment opportunities despite the twists and turns. In particular, computing power infrastructure has been the most certain investment theme in recent years. In the rapidly changing AI industry, how to stay ahead of the curve becomes a key test of investment judgment, as the curve of computing power growth changes, models develop, and innovative scenarios emerge on the application side.
Q:How to judge the future growth curve of computing power, and whether there is a driving force for sustained growth?
A:From a modeling perspective, there is still significant room to drive the demand for computing power during the post-train and test phases, especially as companies like OpenAI continue to invest and see revenue growth, and with TSMC's optimistic expectations for capital expenditure on computing power in the coming years, indicating that global demand for computing power will continue to rise.
Q:Does equalization of computing power mean the failure of the scale law, and what impact does overseas computing power have on China's technology investment?
A:Although some people believe that equal computing power can alleviate the problem of insufficient computing power in China, there is still controversy over skin law's role in improving model capabilities. However, engineering optimization and continuous investment in computing power are not contradictory. In the short term, strong capital expenditures from cloud vendors, including TSMC, provide certainty for computing power demand. In the long term, the industry chain may still need to proceed cautiously.
Q:Given the positive trend of computational power, what is the next core segmented track in the next stage?
A:The core issue in the next stage is how to solve structural problems in the direction of computing power and make more precise investment layouts. Research has found clear trends in model training paradigms and inference, such as multimodal and long-memory capabilities that will drive the value inflation of transmission links (such as optical communications) and storage requirements. In addition, there may be a shift in the supply-demand balance point in upstream electronic bulk commodities such as increased CPU demand and similar storage chips, which are worth focusing on as investment directions in the future.
Q:In the field of AI, what is the trend of changes in computing power requirements from training to reasoning, and the development of agented and physical AI?
A:The entire market focus is shifting from the training stage to the inference stage, and further to the demand for agented (agent-based AI) and physical AI. It is anticipated that there will be a rise in training demand by 2024, followed by inference demand in 2025, agented demand in 2026, and physical AI training demand in the next three to four years. These demands are constantly evolving, with the computational infrastructure required for agented AI and physical AI being much greater compared to the second stage of inference demand.
Q:In the overseas computing power sector, how can active fund management demonstrate an advantage over index products that are difficult to outperform?
A:Although the index contains second and third-tier companies, the position of industry leading companies is relatively stable. In the short term, investing in leading companies may underperform the index, but in the long term, excellent leading companies will outperform second and third-tier companies. Therefore, sticking to fundamental research, finding and holding industry leading companies for the long term, has the potential to outperform passive indexes.
Q:How can actively managed equity funds achieve excess returns in extreme market conditions, focusing on AI or technology sectors?
A:Active equity funds construct relatively fewer selected portfolios through careful selection, mainly investing in targets of core supply chain companies where excess returns have been concentrated in the past few years. Even in the face of the rapid changes in the technology industry, active fund managers can capture excess returns and alpha by thoroughly studying changes in industry logic and narrative reversals.
Q:How should we view the controversy in the field of AI, especially concerns about bubbles caused by mutual investments between tech giants and big model giants?
A:This concern stems from the extremely high barrier to entry in the industry, requiring a large amount of capital investment, which only a few players can bear and participate in the competition. The current environment is different from the Internet technology bubble period, and the risks and returns around AI investment are now the key considerations for both businesses and investors. In addition, the cross-shareholding and massive investment between major companies are aimed at seizing computing power resources and technological iteration advantages, rather than simply pursuing leveraged investments.
Q:In the AI era, investment is expanding into more fields upstream and downstream. How to consider allocation in the energy, electricity, and metal industries?
A:I believe that the incremental demand for AI will have a significant impact on the non-ferrous and other energy power metal industries. From the perspective of supply and demand, next year, over half of the incremental demand will be driven by AI, including the usage related to data centers and upstream energy infrastructure. Currently, related assets have shown good investment returns in the past two years, and with the growth of AI demand, the correlation with AI-related stocks is gradually increasing. In the future, new investment opportunities can still be found in this major trend.
Q:The power grid investment cycle is long and its characteristics are different. How to deal with the mismatch between it and the expansion of AI computing power?
A:There is indeed a mismatch issue because the main investors in the power grid are mostly the government or private entities, while the expansion of computing power in data centers is driven by internet companies. There are differences in understanding and judgment of power demand between these two parties, which may become more apparent in the future as the demand for AI continues to increase.
Q:What are some specific examples and potential challenges surrounding the demand for metal?
A:The demand for copper is growing rapidly, but the demand for aluminum related to data center cooling is also increasing rapidly, and the aluminum production process consumes a lot of electricity. When facing power shortages, balancing the power demand of data centers and aluminum electrolysis production may create a new supply and demand challenge, especially in the coming years, the importance of this issue is becoming increasingly prominent.
Q:How do you view the development trend of model capabilities, especially the competitive landscape and future evolution of large models?
A:This year, the most anticipated project is the large model trained by the NVIDIA GB series, which is expected to be released between the first and second quarters. Model technology is experiencing accelerated changes, from large models to native multimodal models. The standards for large models will become more complex and diverse, and evaluating model capabilities will not only be based on competitive rankings, but also on the ability to solve specific problems, cost efficiency, real-time online learning, and post-train training for adapting to different tasks. In terms of domestic models, significant progress is expected to be made this year in areas such as long-text reasoning and full-modal pre-training.
Q:How will the basic model ecosystem and the trophic small model ecosystem develop? Will the large model tend to be commercialized?
A:The future basic model ecosystem will be relatively stable, with fewer model manufacturers on the top ten list. However, each manufacturer will not engage in completely homogeneous competition; each will have its own advantages and characteristics. For small and medium-sized enterprises and second-tier internet companies, they can choose to use existing large model capabilities as the base model, and develop their own vertical applications and small models on top of it to reduce costs and increase efficiency. Overall, the large model ecosystem will present a diversified competitive landscape, no longer just homogeneous competition.
Q:What is the current application status and future development prospects of AI?
A:The applications of AI have gradually unfolded in many scenarios, especially at the consumer end, where large model software installed on smartphones will become important personal assistants. Starting in 2026, many tedious applications will be replaced by AI, such as code generation in the programming field, which has already been largely completed by AI. In addition, there is a significant amount of manual cost in processes such as American credit card billing and loan assessment, and these financial industry scenarios are expected to be rapidly replaced by AI, thereby increasing labor productivity.
Q:What is your opinion on whether the A-share computer media industry has investment value?
A:Although the development of AI technology may squeeze out other IT expenses, in the long run, companies with top large models have higher investment value, such as Alibaba. However, for those companies that mainly rely on AI investment, their business models may be affected, so I personally do not hold a very optimistic view of such companies.
Q:What are the most promising niche directions in 2026?
A:Looking at the AI computing power infrastructure related fields, it is expected to continue to outperform market expectations in the first half of the year. In the second half of the year, with the release of new production capacity, supply and demand balance may change. At the same time, edge devices such as robots are also a long-term focus. Although short-term certainty is not high, they are expected to become a high certainty and large investment direction in the long term.
Q:How to view the recent spring market frenzy and its underlying driving forces in the A-shares market?
A:Recently, the A-share market has been experiencing a lively Spring season trend. The underlying driving force behind this is the scarcity of supply and demand far exceeding market expectations, especially in the AI computing power infrastructure sector. This includes aspects such as storage, optical chips, and copper foil production capacity, all of which are extremely tight. This has led many companies to maintain high-speed growth in EPS or even exceed expectations. However, in the second half of the year, with the release of new production capacity, the supply and demand situation may improve, which could have a certain impact on market valuations.
Q:From a macro perspective, what changes have occurred in the current economic environment compared to the past?
A:Now the macro environment has undergone significant changes compared to the past. In the past, it was an investment-driven economy, with a large proportion of real estate and fixed asset expenditures, leading to significant cyclical fluctuations. However, since 2021, the proportion of investment-driven industries in the macro economy has gradually decreased, reducing their impact on the economy and weakening economic cyclical fluctuations. Now, more attention is focused on changes in industrial structure and the impact of monetary cycles, similar to the U.S. market, where market fluctuations depend more on monetary policy cycles.
Q:What are the different investment strategies in the current market environment?
A:In the current context of abundant liquidity and the transformation of old and new sources of energy in the industrial structure, it is more important to look for structural opportunities while considering the reduction of macroeconomic risks, such as the diminishing negative impact of real estate and debt on the economy. Therefore, market risk preferences are increasing, and investors can focus more on directions with larger long-term growth potential.
Q:Regarding Dong Han, what strong sectors did he seize this year and how did he maintain his composure?
A:I think short-term performance may largely be due to luck, while long-term performance can truly show one's abilities. The reason why the funds I manage show strong explosiveness is because the industries I deeply cultivate, such as semiconductors and military industries, happen to benefit from industrial policies and market hotspots, such as the commercial aerospace sector. Grasping hotspots depends on long-term cultivation and understanding of the industry, rather than blindly chasing short-term hotspots.
Q:In the volatile market in spring, how to adjust mentality and persevere?
A:During the bustling spring market, it is important to stick to one's competence circle, focus on the long-term areas one has been cultivating, seize investment opportunities that appear in one's own field of expertise, rather than actively chasing all the hotspots. For example, when industries such as manufacturing, machinery, or power equipment experience a market trend, make sure to accurately grasp and seize these opportunities.
Q:What is Meng Qi's investment philosophy in the field of shipbuilding? Which industries does he favor the most and what is the logic behind it?
A:I am very optimistic about the off-shore manufacturing sector in 2026, it is a long-term trend. From a timing perspective, some companies have been laying out their off-shore strategy many years ago and now their performance is starting to explode. China's off-shore manufacturing is a gradual process, starting from simple products to complex products, which will create more investment opportunities. The two directions I am most optimistic about next year are: first, capital goods in the European and American industrial chains, especially as the European economy has greater margin elasticity; second, machinery and vehicles in the South American region, due to strong market demand and better than expected economic performance.
Q:How to avoid the risks brought by a single asset or industry in investment?
A:There are mainly two ways to avoid this kind of risk. The first is to choose companies with sufficient global presence, such as in the technology sector, where giants like Apple usually help solve related issues if a problem arises. The second is to look for investment opportunities in regions with lower geopolitical risks, such as Africa, Southeast Asia, and parts of Europe.
Q:For Chinese companies going global, how can they diversify the risks of a single market through globalization layout?
A:Companies should try to find businesses with diversified global layouts, rather than just focusing on a single market and sector. This way, even if one market experiences fluctuations, the overall risk will be relatively manageable. For example, some companies in the engineering machinery industry have their business operations diversified and low exposure to individual countries, so the impact of risks in a single country is minimal.
Q:What changes have occurred in the valuation paradigm for Chinese manufacturing companies going global?
A:Many Chinese manufacturing companies that were originally considered traditional and domestic-focused have gradually diversified their business structures and moved towards globalization in the process of going international. During this process, they not only expanded their EPS growth, but also experienced changes in their valuation systems. For example, a leading heavy truck company saw its valuation increase from single-digit PE ratios to around 10 to 20 times due to opportunities in the field of artificial intelligence.
Q:How do you view the opportunities for industries such as electric power equipment and non-ferrous metals in terms of expanding overseas?
A:The electric power equipment industry is a comparative advantage industry in China, possessing world-leading grid technology and related technical expertise. With the growth of electricity demand, especially driven by AI and increasing energy storage needs, more electric power equipment is needed as a buffer zone between the grid and AIIDC, providing the electric power equipment industry with opportunities for certain growth. As for the non-ferrous industry, its prices are influenced by various factors including interest rates, demand, supply, geopolitics, etc. In the current environment, it is important to pay attention to factors such as US interest rate cuts, supply and demand relationships, and technological advancements affecting metals like copper.
Q:As a commodity, can gold continue to be stored in the future?
A:Gold is one of the most difficult commodities to predict globally, making it difficult to accurately judge its future trends. Although financial attributes such as the US dollar credit crisis have brought widespread attention to gold, the main issue with holding gold is that it does not bear interest and does not have continuous growth value. However, from an alpha perspective, some gold-listed companies with resource expansion capabilities and mining acquisition advantages, such as trillion-level leading non-ferrous metal companies, may outperform the price of gold itself due to continuous integration of mineral resources and overseas expansion.
Q:In the current environment, which specific directions within the semiconductor industry do you favor the most, and could you explain the rationale behind it?
A:From the perspective of industrial trends, semiconductors can be divided into two directions: cyclic and growth. The cyclical direction mainly focuses on the scarce global memory sector. Based on an understanding of the progress of models, especially from the perspective of technical difficulty, the current development of AI has created a very strong demand for memory. For example, new technologies such as HBM continue to emerge to meet the cost and efficiency requirements, which will make the memory cycle market stronger and longer-lasting. In addition, derivative opportunities include the application of new technologies in domestic computing power semiconductor equipment and storage.
Q:How do you view the Hong Kong stock market?
A:The level of institutionalization in the Hong Kong stock market is relatively high, making it a global offshore allocation market. However, there is limited stable local capital, leading to significant fluctuations in Hong Kong stock valuations. When the market is relatively cheap, it may be suitable to hold onto Hong Kong stocks for the long term. Currently, favorable factors include an increase in Hong Kong IPO companies providing more investment targets, as well as opportunities to invest in high-dividend state-owned enterprises and tech giants. In particular, tech giants can better reflect the domestic demand economic situation.
Q:How do you view the investment strategy of fixed income plus in 2026?
A:In 2026, the main source of income for fixed income products comes from the equity portion. The interpretation of the stock and bond markets this year is worth paying attention to. Overall, the stock market does not pose a significant risk and can maintain some expectations. However, it is necessary to pay special attention to the volatility and risk of overseas markets. For fixed income products, asset scarcity should be emphasized in allocation, while controlling positions and seizing the right timing to allocate unique assets in order to achieve a better risk-return ratio.
Q:What is your view on the space for US monetary policy and fiscal policy, as well as their impact on asset prices?
A:I believe that, considering the prices of assets running at high levels in the long term, if further upside is to be supported, there will be a high demand for monetary and fiscal policy space in the United States. Therefore, my views on this are relatively conservative.
Q:What are your views and suggestions on this year's bond market and stock-bond strategy? How do you assess the situation in the bond market this year and what kind of operational strategy do you plan to adopt?
A:This year I tend to pay more attention to overseas market fluctuations, especially in the stock market. As for the bond market, I believe that current yields are trending upward, mainly due to the revision of overly pessimistic expectations for the Chinese economy and capital markets. Given the current weak economic growth, which requires a low interest rate environment for support, my view on the bond market this year tends towards neutral, and I suggest balancing stocks and bonds when appropriate opportunities arise. I am relatively optimistic about the bond market this year. Considering the country's active participation in forward-looking investments in the global competition and stabilizing the economy at the grassroots level through fiscal and monetary hedging. With the current high general deficit rate and significant policy resource allocation, the economy may continue to maintain stability in the future. The limited upside potential for bond yields, coupled with scarce loan resources, makes bond yields closely linked to loan yields. Therefore, bond yields are not likely to rise easily, and with downward pressure on financial institutions' borrowing costs, bonds become a relatively low-risk but potentially low-yield asset class.
Q:What is the current allocation structure of your 97 (Fixed Income +) product?
A:In the current supply and demand structure, there is a shortage of short-term bonds and an excess of long-term bonds. However, from the perspective of overall asset supply, investments in risk-free interest rate products should prioritize yield, focusing on purchasing those with higher yields. For complex products such as credit bonds, choices should be made based on a combination of risk tolerance and credit ratings.
Q:What is your view on the equity market for this year?
A:From a historical perspective, the performance of the equity market is often related to the tightening of policies. This year, both domestic and foreign policies are generally loose, which is favorable for the performance of the equity market. We should pay more attention to the level of EPS (profitability) and, based on past experiences with valuation and performance, while maintaining an optimistic attitude, focus on investment opportunities at the EPS level.
Q:What are the core sources of excess contribution in the past two years? Why has the performance of non-ferrous metals been outstanding in strategic allocation?
A:The core source of excess contribution in the past two years comes from the non-ferrous metal industry. Our layout in the non-ferrous sector began three years ago, focusing on its long-term strategic value. In different market stages, we try to avoid tactical errors as much as possible, although sometimes we may miss short-term opportunities, but overall we are overweighted on the strategic level.
Q:How should we consider the historical context and strategic direction when investing?
A:In investing, we need to deeply consider the strategic background of the current era and look for industries or sectors with long-term excess returns. For example, the non-ferrous industry has shown excess returns for three consecutive years, and its market performance has been sustained for a long time, reflecting underlying macro trend changes.
Q:What impact does the current macroeconomic background have on the non-ferrous metals industry?
A:Since the outbreak of the epidemic, the world has entered a period dominated by fiscal policies, which is different from the previous era dominated by currencies. The increase in physical demand, especially in industries such as non-ferrous metals, has had a positive impact. In addition, the rise of resource populism has led to a fragile future supply, and the restructuring of demand at the industry level (such as energy transformation, AI industrialization, etc.) has replaced the demand for real estate and infrastructure, all of which have had a positive impact on the non-ferrous industry.
Q:How do you view the current valuation, opportunities, and risks in the convertible bond market?
A:Currently, the valuation of convertible bonds in the market is relatively high, but in essence, it is highly correlated with stocks and is a reflection of equity assets. If the stock market is doing well, convertible bonds will also perform well, and usually have a lower volatility coefficient in the short term market. Convertible bond assets themselves have the characteristic of a high Sharpe ratio, meaning a high annual return rate and low drawdown, due to the strong demand for convertible bonds, high conversion probability, and the ease of achieving deterministic returns in high activity levels. The current high valuation of convertible bonds is based on their asset characteristics and the potential need for inflation hedging and technology theme asset volatility increase in the future, which overall seems reasonable.
Q:How do you view the issue of the current overvaluation of convertible bonds?
A:I think the current overvaluation of convertible bonds is a reasonable phenomenon, it reflects the trend of declining risk-free interest rates in the entire society and the scarcity of assets. Due to the strong liquidity expectations, everyone is pricing call options more actively, so although the current valuation is expensive, the market has not yet reached an extreme state, and investment opportunities still exist.
Q:In fixed income products, as a fund manager, which industries do you see as having good investment opportunities this year, and how will you conduct industry rotation?
A:This year, we are optimistic about the two major industries of AI and non-ferrous metals, and we will focus on and extend our efforts in these areas. For example, in the field of AI computing power, we will focus on new technologies and domestic supply chains. In terms of applications, we are bullish on internet giants with large-scale model layouts and the robot industry. In the second half of the year, there may be opportunities after the slowdown in storage price increases in the fruit chain. In addition, in the AI field, we are also optimistic about semiconductor equipment, chip companies, gas turbines, and power equipment related to rising storage prices. In the non-ferrous metals industry, in addition to gold, copper, aluminum, and other varieties, we will also focus on small metals with disrupted supply chains and new technology fields such as solid-state batteries that show clear industrialization trends. At the same time, we are also focusing on non-bank, consumer-related companies, and companies related to the export chain that have potential for growth. The coal industry has a relatively high investment success rate during certain periods.
Q:In terms of industry rotation, how do you decide when to adjust industry allocation based on which dimensions?
A:Industry rotation mainly revolves around three dimensions: firstly, industry outlook and expectations, which are the core factors determining the success rate of investments; secondly, valuation levels and corresponding chip structures, which will affect the investment odds; thirdly, the macro policy direction at the national level, as international and overseas policies also have a significant impact on equity investments. We will focus on tracking industry outlook forecasts, combine them with an industry outlook tracking framework for strict monitoring, and pay attention to opportunities for industry bottom reversals.
Q:In the management of fixed income products, how to achieve strict drawdown control and generate relatively decent returns on this basis?
A:In the management of fixed income plus products, we emphasize the transmission of long-term investment methods rather than short-term asset trading. First, we look for assets with low volatility in the long term, emphasize the importance of asset allocation, and follow the asset intercorrelation based on statistical rules. Secondly, we ensure that all types of assets are purchased at a sufficiently cheap price to improve the portfolio's Sharpe Ratio. In specific operations, we will adhere to the effectiveness of the methodology, even if it requires enduring market fluctuations in the short term, we must believe in the method and flexibly respond to various considerations in the daily market.
Q:How to balance the relationship between market concentration of funds and long-term rules in investments?
A:I believe that first of all, we must adhere to the principle of "don't do what you don't understand", and then balance the concentration of market funds and long-term trends. For assets with high short-term fund concentration, although they may attract a lot of attention and potentially bring quick profits, the long-term expected return rate may decrease. Therefore, we need to find a balance and maintain patience while waiting for valuation regression. At the same time, we need to understand the market trends in different areas as much as possible, so that we can be prepared to participate in the market when specific assets experience fluctuations.
Q:How to weigh the investment decision of the impact of a specific event on the candle prices in a particular neighborhood?
A:Investing can be likened to buying candles when the power goes out in a neighborhood. If a neighborhood is about to experience a widespread blackout, the demand for candles will increase dramatically, causing prices to rise in the short term. In this scenario, it is likely a good idea to participate in the candle market if there is a significant amount of capital involved. However, if in an unfamiliar field (like predicting power outages in Chongqing as a Shanghai resident), due to limited marginal knowledge and difficulty in obtaining information, one should not blindly participate. Instead, one should make investment decisions within their own abilities and knowledge.
Q:How to deal with the relationship between long-term trends and short-term market sentiment in asset allocation?
A:In asset allocation, the first thing to ensure is comprehensiveness, to understand as many types of assets as possible, so that opportunities can be seized when specific events occur in specific assets. However, human energy and time are limited, and it is impossible to make accurate judgments on all sudden events. Therefore, it is necessary to balance long-term value and short-term bubbles, maintain a mentality of weakness, avoid blindly chasing hot spots, such as semiconductor investments, while adhering to long-term investment concepts, such as value investment, to convey a stable asset allocation strategy to holders.
Q:How is the drawdown control of fixed-income products achieved?
A:Retreat control mainly starts from three aspects: first, asset allocation management of major categories, especially strict control of equity asset positions in low-volatility fixed-income products; second, the selection of equity assets, purchasing companies with core competitiveness at reasonable valuations, and cashing in profits when valuations are too high to reduce the volatility of single equity assets; third, the duration of bond investments also needs to be adjusted according to the macro environment to reduce the retreat contribution of bond assets.
Q:What is the difference between secondary debt funds and equity funds in portfolio construction?
A:The similarity lies in the pursuit of long-term compounding returns, with a consistent underlying logic of avoiding overpriced stocks. The difference lies in adjustments made in equity allocation based on different customer risk preferences and product positioning. For example, cyclical themed funds may be more aggressive with higher volatility, while equity funds focused on overall market value direction may be more stable. In secondary bond funds, the equity portion may be more conservative to match the needs of customers seeking stable income.
Q:In our company, how is the importance of teamwork reflected, and how does it help ensure performance stability and promote the growth of fund managers?
A:Our company places a strong emphasis on teamwork, encouraging team members to each bring their own strengths and contribute to each other. Through cross-departmental cooperation, we have created a work atmosphere that is open, gentle, and willing to communicate. This not only helps stabilize performance, but also promotes the personal growth of fund managers. The company encourages teamwork from both the human resources system and the assessment system to help team members grow together and realize their individual value.
Q:For fixed income products, how to avoid the problem of absolute return caused by asset allocation, especially in this year's market environment? As a representative of the conservative type in ensuring absolute returns in fixed income products, Mr. Peng, may I ask what your thoughts are on this matter?
A:This year, the risk of fixed income products turning into reduced fixed income products is relatively small, but it has indeed occurred in history. I believe the key lies in adhering to the top-down asset allocation methodology. Through asset allocation, in the current monetary and financial environment, this methodology helps to obtain stable returns, like a "free lunch". To achieve this goal, one must first believe in and adhere to this methodology, and purchase various assets at relatively cheap prices as much as possible during the investment process. At the same time, one must acknowledge that everyone has knowledge blind spots, so it is necessary to broaden one's knowledge base as much as possible, diversify assets within one's area of expertise, and ensure investments are made in high probability positive return situations. In terms of specific operations, flexibility in adjusting strategies under different market conditions is necessary to ensure success in various niche areas and achieve stable absolute return goals. In preventing fixed income products from turning into reduced fixed income products, I believe it mainly relies on two points: first, adhering to a fixed investment methodology, and second, ensuring that the purchase prices of various assets are relatively cheap during the investment process. At the same time, one should strive to be knowledgeable in different investment areas and avoid situations where all investment areas experience negative returns in a specific year. For example, in bonds, convertible bonds, stocks, and other asset categories, one should seek and seize high probability positive return opportunities, effectively managing each investment area to achieve stable absolute return goals.
play
普通话
普通话
进入会议
1.0
0.5
0.75
1.0
1.5
2.0