2026中国首席经济学家论坛年会
文章语言:
简
繁
EN
Share
Minutes
原文
会议摘要
The 2026 China Chief Economist Forum Annual Meeting focuses on topics such as financial structure transformation and macroeconomic regulation, emphasizing the high-quality party construction leading high-quality enterprise development, launching a comprehensive financial service brand, and promoting industrial upgrading based on the industrial center system. The discussion hotspots include China-US economic relations, the global monetary system, and RMB internationalization, with the need for RMB internationalization to balance domestic and foreign demand and avoid excessive reliance on the dollar cycle. The future global energy structure, changes in the financial sector, and the impact of US-China relations on the future landscape were discussed, with mentions of the trend of RMB internationalization and the decline of the global circulation of the dollar. China should promote the globalization process through high-quality opening-up and win-win thinking, strengthen policy coordination, deepen financial reforms, promote RMB internationalization and optimize economic structure. The next five years are a critical period for achieving the transition to high-quality development, focusing on important topics such as carbon peaking, urbanization, and zero hidden debts, and seizing opportunities such as industrialization in southern countries, globalization of Chinese companies, and AI scenarios.
会议速览
At the 2026 China Chief Economist Forum, policymakers, top scholars, and business leaders gathered in Hongkou, Shanghai to engage in in-depth discussions on key topics such as economic transformation, artificial intelligence, real estate, capital markets, with the aim of summarizing past experiences, exploring future development directions, and jointly writing a new chapter in building a strong nation.
The 2026 China Chief Economist Forum Annual Meeting was held in Shanghai's North Bund of Hongkou district, focusing on economic structural transformation and high-quality development, discussing key issues such as financial reform and technological innovation, aiming to contribute to China and even global economic recovery. At the meeting, the organizers expressed their gratitude to supporting units such as the Guangzhou Development Zone Holding Group, and introduced the rich agenda and diverse perspectives of the annual meeting's sub-forums.
At the 2026 China Chief Economists Forum Annual Meeting, participants reviewed the achievements of the forum since its establishment, including the expansion of its influence as a think tank and its contribution to the construction of the Shanghai International Financial Center. The annual meeting focused on international political and economic situations, macroeconomic policies, and high-quality economic development, aiming to provide decision-making references for the high-quality development of the Chinese economy through in-depth exchanges and discussions. The forum attracted many chief economists from home and abroad to participate, jointly looking forward to the future and contributing to the construction of a new development pattern.
At the 2026 Chinese Chief Economist Forum Annual Meeting, a representative of the Shanghai Municipal Committee Financial Office emphasized Shanghai's position as an international financial center, reviewed the achievements of financial reform and opening up during the "14th Five-Year Plan" period, including deepening the financial system, improving the quality and efficiency of services for the real economy, and preventing financial risks. During the meeting, thanks were expressed for the valuable opinions put forward by the chief economists, and the goals of building Shanghai into an international financial center during the "15th Five-Year Plan" period were anticipated, such as advancing high-level financial opening up, optimizing financial services, and creating a first-class business environment, aiming to promote high-quality economic development and the formation of new productive forces.
The 2026 China Chief Economist Forum annual meeting was held at the North Bund of Hongkou District in Shanghai, emphasizing the core direction of building Shanghai into an international financial center. The meeting reviewed the significant achievements of Hongkou District in the integration of finance and industry, including the breakthrough of asset management scale exceeding 80 trillion yuan, the presence of internationally renowned financial institutions, and the establishment of financial innovation platforms. The meeting looked forward to the development of the 15th Five-Year Plan and called on experts and scholars to provide intellectual support for regional development. It also discussed the record-breaking 16 consecutive closing days of the capital market and anticipated its positive impact on the future development of the capital market.
This sharing session emphasized the important role of chief economists in promoting market awareness and serving economic decision-making, and proposed that building an independent theoretical system for the Chinese capital market is a current important topic. The sharer reviewed the achievements of the development of the Chinese capital market, pointed out the challenges and issues of the current reality, called for strengthening theoretical research, deepening understanding of market operation laws, and proposing constructive suggestions to support high-quality decision-making. At the same time, it was emphasized that the construction of theoretical system should be rooted in the national conditions, differentiate from Western theories, and reflect Chinese characteristics. The sharer also introduced the progress of the Chinese Capital Market Society and called on experts from all sectors to support the work of the society and jointly promote the high-quality development of the capital market.
The forum discussed the uncertainty characteristics of the world economy in 2026, pointing out that the root causes lie in the weakening global growth momentum, fragile financial system, and the replacement of efficiency logic by geopolitical economic logic. China should provide certainty through macroeconomic growth, industrial supply, institutional rules, and financial stability at four levels to address external challenges with internal stability and contribute to global economic stability.
Discussed the development changes of direct finance and indirect finance in the financial structure of China, pointing out that since 2025, the proportion of incremental indirect finance has decreased, while the proportion of incremental direct finance has increased. Moreover, the growth rate of direct finance has exceeded that of indirect finance, and the proportion of direct finance in the existing stock has also increased.
The dialogue provides a comprehensive analysis of the impact of China's economic structural transformation on financing demand, pointing out that indirect financing such as credit demand has significantly decreased, especially for medium and long-term credit for residents and enterprises, while direct financing such as corporate bonds and equity investments has seen rapid growth. Government bond issuance has played an important role in stimulating domestic demand, and the development of high-tech industries and strategic emerging industries has driven the growth of direct financing.
Discussed the impact of future proactive fiscal policies, changes in traditional financing needs, and the development of capital markets on the optimization of economic structure, emphasizing that the increased proportion of direct financing will help with economic transformation and upgrading, lowering financing costs, reducing corporate debt pressure. It also pointed out the importance of the development of direct financing in deepening financial reforms and enhancing the internationalization level of the renminbi.
The guests conducted a thorough analysis of the impact of economies of scale on economic growth and structural optimization, emphasizing the importance of economies of scale in macroeconomic analysis, and shared unique insights on understanding economic structural changes from a macro perspective.
From the perspective of economies of scale, this paper explores the challenges facing the Chinese economy, emphasizing the global leading advantages of green industries, artificial intelligence, and other emerging industries, while also pointing out the insufficient demand and downward pressure. It reviews the history of the Great Depression in the United States, analyzes the roles of social security systems and macroeconomic regulation in economic recovery. It proposes that China should learn from historical experience, improve its social security system and implement rational macroeconomic regulation to promote a virtuous cycle of economies of scale and technological innovation, in order to address economic downward pressure and achieve sustainable development.
The discussion on the EU carbon border adjustment tax and US fossil energy policy emphasized the economies of scale advantages of China's green industry development and its positive impact on the global economy. As a manufacturing industry, green energy has the characteristic of cost reduction with scale expansion, and industry competitiveness ensures global benefits. The development of China's green industry not only lowers global green energy costs but also promotes technological progress and innovation, demonstrating the economic logic and future potential of green transition.
The dialogue discussed the development path of green industries, pointing out that China supports emerging industries through government subsidies, which contrasts with the EU's carbon trading market and carbon tax policies. The Chinese model has proven to be more successful in the past 20 years, emphasizing the rationality and economic logic of government subsidies in promoting the scale and cost reduction of green industries. It is believed to be a major contribution to the global economy and provides insights for future policies.
Discussed the importance of green transformation, especially the volatility and ineffectiveness of the carbon trading market in emerging markets. Shared various estimation methods for AI economic growth, including extrapolation and task substitution methods, as well as predictions for China's future economic growth. Analyzed the impact of geopolitical economic changes on trade structures, proposed a new model of external loop closure, emphasized the problem of weak internal demand, attributed to the downward financial cycle and real estate debt issues, and proposed a strategy of coordinated fiscal and monetary policies to boost domestic demand.
The importance of fiscal stimulus in the second half of the financial cycle was discussed, emphasizing that while direct financing is developing, it cannot replace the function of credit creation in money supply. It stressed the role of fiscal policy in regulating income distribution, improving social security systems, and promoting common prosperity, proposing a macroeconomic policy of tight credit, loose monetary policy, and expansionary fiscal policy.
At the annual conference, an important guest was invited to give a keynote speech focusing on the topic of timely reduction of reserve requirements and interest rates in coordination with an active fiscal policy. The speaker has rich experience in the central bank system and unique insights into the coordination of macroeconomic policies, and will delve into how the coordination of monetary policy and fiscal policy can promote stable economic growth. The audience at the scene is looking forward to this sharing, believing that it will provide valuable insights for understanding current economic policies.
The possibility of a gradual approach to monetary policy was discussed, emphasizing that monetary policy indirectly affects the economy through market feedback, unlike direct action by fiscal policy. The importance of lowering reserve requirements and interest rates in conjunction with an active fiscal policy was proposed, highlighting the role of reserve requirements as a liquidity injection tool, as well as measures to enrich the central bank's policy toolbox such as reverse repo agreements and open market operations to ensure adequate liquidity.
Discussion has been made on the view that lowering reserve requirement ratio (RRR) is more beneficial than lowering interest rates in the current economic environment to support an active fiscal policy. It is emphasized that lowering RRR can increase commercial banks' funds to purchase government bonds, in coordination with fiscal policy. It is pointed out that our country's deficit ratio should be increased to over 4%, and the broad deficit ratio could reach 8%, in order to promote economic growth. The Central Economic Work Conference supports maintaining the necessary scale of fiscal deficit and total expenditure.
The adjustment strategy of China's monetary policy was discussed, emphasizing the importance of lowering the reserve requirement ratio rather than substantially reducing interest rates to maintain financial system stability, support the real economy, and avoid financial risks caused by excessively low interest rates. It was pointed out that China's consumption and investment have low interest rate elasticity, and that lowering interest rates has limited effects on promoting consumption and investment. Therefore, it is advocated to gradually lower interest rates and use structural monetary policy tools to support technological innovation and weak economic sectors. It is expected that there will continue to be moderate reductions in interest rates and reserve requirements over the next two years, in conjunction with fiscal policy, to gradually restore the economy from the bottom range.
Discussed the positive impact of the reserve requirement ratio cut on the macroeconomy and equity assets, emphasizing the importance of increasing residents' income to expand domestic demand and achieve common prosperity, and then inviting economists to share their thoughts and strategies on optimizing income distribution and increasing residents' income.
Discussed the income distribution pattern in China, it is pointed out that although the proportion of residents' income is high, it is relatively low, mainly due to insufficient property income; the proportion of corporate income is relatively high, related to state-owned enterprises and dividend policies; the proportion of government income is low, affecting public services and macroeconomic control capabilities. It is proposed that optimizing income distribution should be combined with development stages and resource endowments, increasing the proportion of labor compensation, adjusting industrial structure, and constructing a reasonable income distribution mechanism.
The importance of the 15th Five-Year Plan is discussed from multiple dimensions such as economy, industry, and society, interpreting its strategic significance as a key period for national development. Participants emphasized core issues such as increasing per capita income, upgrading industries, restoring social balance, and promoting technological innovation. They believe that the next five years are crucial for transitioning to high-quality development, addressing international challenges, deepening the internationalization of enterprises, and competition between China and the United States. It is also seen as a critical stage for achieving goals such as carbon peaking, urbanization transformation, and clearing hidden debts.
The dialogue revolves around the opportunities and challenges of China's economic development in the next five years, proposing industrialization in southern countries, globalization of Chinese enterprises, scenario-based application of AI, and increasing consumption rates as key opportunities. During the discussion, there was an emphasis on improving the distribution of national income, strengthening consumption infrastructure construction, and promoting paid staggered vacations to stimulate consumption, believing that these paths are crucial for increasing consumption rates.
The conversation discussed the opportunities and challenges for China in the next five years, focusing on moving away from reliance on real estate, the development of the new economy (particularly artificial intelligence), and its impact on the macroeconomy. It pointed out that the new economy is now macroeconomically significant, but there is still insufficient improvement at the micro level, emphasizing the need to pay attention to the impact of technological progress on employment. It suggested solving debt problems through development-driven deleveraging and achieving optimal asset allocation on the asset side.
Discussed the impact of AI development on employment, proposed to avoid the trap of Turing, that is, technological progress should enhance human value rather than replace humans, emphasized the importance of pre-layout of social security network, especially focusing on the protection of young people and flexible employment groups, and also suggested to strengthen the enforcement of labor laws to prevent internal competition, and maintain stability in the job market.
The importance of carbon governance mechanisms in the next five years was discussed, including local carbon assessments, industry controls, corporate management, and project evaluations. It emphasized the fundamental role of carbon accounting and the market development opportunities it brings. At the same time, it pointed out the opportunities and challenges of the development potential in Xinjiang and the Northeast region, changes in financial structures, and improvements in macroeconomic control capabilities. It also mentioned the role of rationalizing national income distribution in promoting consumption.
The conversation revolves around investment opportunities in 2026, focusing on new economic areas such as AI applications, technological self-reliance (including controlled nuclear fusion and quantum technology), and industry consolidation opportunities brought about by anti-squandering. Experts emphasized the importance of asset securitization and leveraging state-owned capital to increase residents' property income, while also pointing out that bottoming out and price recovery, as well as macro policy adjustments, will have a positive impact on midstream and upstream industries. In addition, they also mentioned the potential for rising commodity prices due to increased consumption subsidies and infrastructure increases, as well as the potential value of gold investments in the context of Sino-US confrontation, providing an overall outlook on the hopes and opportunities of the investment market in 2026.
The forum releases the chief index, based on multidimensional economic data, to provide references for macroeconomic analysis. At the same time, three new books are released: "Towards the End of the Fifteen Flagship" comprehensively interprets the Fifteen Five framework; "Globalization and Major Changes" analyzes changes in global industrial chains and China's response strategies; "Chief Fund Investment White Paper" includes analysis by top economists and experiences of excellent investment institutions to provide guidance for asset allocation.
The forum announced the launch of new products such as chief consulting, salons, face-to-face meetings, and study tours, aiming to transform the wisdom of top economists into practical decision-making tools. The afternoon session focuses on global political and economic changes and the restructuring of industrial chains, inviting experts to delve into discussions in order to deal with market uncertainty through professional wisdom.
The shift in the US national security strategy, from a struggle of life and death to one of superiority and inferiority, was discussed, affecting economic cooperation between Latin America and China and Latin America. It was pointed out that 2026 may be a year of global turmoil, but for China, it is an opportunity for rise, requiring wisdom to handle US intervention strategies.
The dialogue analyzed the changes in the global political and military situation, pointing out that the core of the east rise and west decline is the rise of developing countries, especially China, while the United States, although leading in military high technology, is facing a relative decline in the strength of traditional economic entities such as Europe and Japan. Economically, China has become the largest producer, while the United States is the largest consumer. The global power structure is shifting towards two superpowers and more strong countries, and multipolarity is becoming a trend. China's GDP share is increasing, and the future may usher in a great rejuvenation.
The dialogue discussed the increasing GDP share of BRICS countries and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization under the trend of global multipolarity, the changing economic status of the United States and the European Union, and China's proactive position in economic competition. It emphasized the importance of technological breakthroughs, domestic demand growth, and open policies for China's future development, pointing out that the trade war has prompted China to optimize its foreign trade structure and the technology war has stimulated domestic technological innovation. In the future, funds may be more inclined to flow to large countries that are safe and stable, and China is expected to become a key destination for capital inflows.
The conversation revolves around the disruptive impact of the artificial intelligence revolution on the economic production function, discussing the trend of intelligent labor replacement and its challenge to macroeconomic theory. At the same time, it analyzes the changes in the global geopolitical landscape, especially the dynamics of competition between China and the United States, and the impact of these changes on financial markets. It emphasizes the changing real-time score between China and the United States in the competition for national destiny in the supersonic tsunami-level transformation center, as well as the uncertainty and long-term perspective of future economic trends.
Discussed the key stage of the AI industry revolution transitioning from the capitalization of computing power in the first half to the increase in computing power penetration in the second half, emphasizing the importance of the deep integration of AI and hardware to form a complete industrial ecosystem. It pointed out China's advantages in manufacturing and engineering optimization capabilities, giving it an irreplaceable position in constructing a complete ecosystem in the AI backend and achieving capital closure. At the same time, analyzed the trend of rising gold prices against the backdrop of the decreasing credibility of the US dollar, and the impact of the US all-in AI strategy on supporting the US dollar. Finally, it looked forward to China's leadership position and national prospects in the AI industry revolution.
The discussion focuses on the construction and re-allocation of the global new order in the context of globalization, analyzing the foundation and changes of the global order, especially the escalating trade conflicts between the United States and non-US countries. It emphasizes the importance of trade in goods and capital flows, as well as China's positioning and opportunities in the adjustment of the global economic landscape, pointing out the limitations of the mobility of people and information in the process of globalization.
The dialogue focused on the trends of globalization and anti-globalization, and delved into the changing role of the United States in it, including the impact of its tariff policies on the global economy, as well as the challenges and opportunities faced by China as a driver of globalization. The discussion involved adjustments to the United States' national security strategy, the shift in dynamics between China and the U.S. in globalization, and the potential formulation of new rules in the future globalization process. All parties agreed that globalization is undergoing significant adjustments, and that China needs to address the imbalance between trade surpluses and deficits while achieving mutual benefits in promoting globalization, while the U.S. needs to reassess its position and strategy in the global economy.
The dialogue discussed the economic relationship between China and the United States, emphasizing the impact of the serious divergence between the macroeconomic and industrial levels on both sides' attitudes. It pointed out that the United States performs well in macroeconomic operations, but lags behind China in the industrial sector, with China accounting for more than half of the global industrial product capacity. China should focus on regulating macroeconomic indicators, such as nominal GDP, to shape the external environment and expand development space. It is recommended to strengthen internal strength and leverage market advantages.
The biggest variable in Sino-US relations in the next five years is predicted by AI models to be the development of AI technology, with economic adaptability being key. The discussion mentions that the uncertainty of AI, possible bubble bursts, and the impact on economy and employment will test the economic resilience of both countries. In addition, from the perspectives of cooperation and competition, the probabilities of future strategic interest exchanges, technology wars, financial wars, and hot wars are evaluated, emphasizing the importance of seeking strategic balance in the Thucydides Trap.
Discussed the comparison of economic strength between China and the United States, as well as future competition, pointing out that the United States is facing high inflation and weaknesses in manufacturing, while China needs to address the issues of slowing economic growth and inadequate domestic demand. Emphasized the importance of investing in technology and expanding domestic demand, believing that providing a larger market can strengthen international economic and trade relations, reduce confrontation, and enhance their own initiative in the competition.
The conversation revolves around the technological blockade and independent innovation in the context of great power competition, discussing the competitive situation between China and the United States in the fields of semiconductors, AI, as well as China's technological market advantage in new energy, 5G communication, and other areas. At the same time, asset price predictions focus on the US dollar index, gold, commodities, etc., analyzing the impact of supply and demand relationships and financial attributes on prices, and proposing that domestic substitution and technology transformation are the future investment trends.
The conversation delved into the rising trend of metal prices and the potential increase in stock market valuations in the context of preparations for war. The analysis pointed out that metals focused on military use are the most promising, followed by metals used in modern warfare drones, and metals with demand in both military and real estate sectors. Gold remains bullish due to liquidity-driven factors, but caution is advised regarding potential financial crisis risks in the future. The expansionary policies of central banks around the world will drive up stock market valuations, especially in China's A-shares, and the application of policy-based financial instruments will stabilize and promote investment growth. The annual strategy emphasizes the positive impact of liquidity on stock valuations, and is optimistic about two major investment directions: metals and the stock market.
Discussed the reasons for the continued weakening of the US dollar and its impact on global asset prices, pointing out that the key factors for the weakening of the dollar are the US trade deficit and reduced capital inflows. At the same time, predicted that the Chinese Yuan will strengthen, emphasizing the potential improvement in Chinese inflation and its positive impact on asset allocation. Additionally, mentioned the general upward trend in precious metals such as gold, silver, and the metal market, as well as the contribution of industrialization in global southern countries to metal demand. Finally, compared the investment value of US stocks and A-shares, believing that A-shares are more attractive under risk-weighted volatility.
The discussion centered around the global imbalance phenomenon in the context of globalization, especially the evolution of the US Dollar system and its impact on the global economy and financial markets. From the gold standard to the Bretton Woods system, and then to the Jamaica system, the shift in currency systems has led to a new pattern of global flow of goods and services. Under modern currency systems, global imbalances have become the norm, with the role of the US Dollar as the primary payment tool increasingly prominent, creating profound effects on global trade and economic order.
After the decoupling of the US dollar from gold in 1971, the global trade imbalance intensified, leading to sustained current account deficits in the United States. This change was a result of the establishment of fiat currency systems, which enabled unlimited creation of international payment instruments, supporting the expansion of global trade. Under the gold standard, trade imbalances would be automatically corrected, but the fiat currency system broke this mechanism, leading to global imbalance becoming a feature of the modern international trade system.
Discussed the accumulated current account deficit of 13.9 trillion US dollars in the United States over the past 24 years, as well as the nature of global trade imbalance, namely the United States creating a global surplus through the dollar and collecting seigniorage. Analyzed the closeness of the US-China trade relationship, which, despite a decrease in surface data, is actually more indirectly close. The Triffin Dilemma poses a threat to the Bretton Woods system, but has limited impact on the current Jamaica system, as the United States maintains confidence in the dollar through its strong power.
The dialogue discussed the future direction of the US dollar as the world's major reserve currency, pointing out that its decline is not due to external challenges, but rather to hollowing out of American industries and uneven income distribution. The US is attempting to address this through a strategy of de-globalization, but the lag in domestic economic structural adjustments has led to contradictions between the decreasing outflow of the US dollar and the increasing domestic debt. In the future, the global circulation of the US dollar will gradually decline, affecting global trade balance.
Discussed the impact of the global shift from the dominance to decline of the US dollar on the global economy, emphasizing that the internationalization of the Renminbi should not aim to replace the dollar, but to focus on maintaining trade stability. It is suggested that due to the US's unwillingness to take responsibility for global demand creation, China needs to make long-term adjustments by increasing domestic demand and reducing reliance on foreign demand. In the short term, the US attitude towards deglobalization will affect China's external demand trend by 2026, so China should be prepared for a stabilizing and decreasing external demand.
The achievements of the internationalization of the RMB in the post-pandemic era were shared, including the improvement in Swift payment rankings and global trade financing, as well as progress in financing such as the issuance of Panda bonds and Dim Sum bonds. The possible impact of changes in US policies on the dominant position of the US dollar was discussed, and the challenges and opportunities faced by the internationalization of the RMB were presented. The attractiveness of the RMB as a financing currency in the face of low interest rates was emphasized.
The discussion on the "triple kill" phenomenon of US stocks, bonds, and exchange rates after April 2, as well as the behavior of overseas investors hedging risks on US dollar assets, and its short-term impact on the US dollar exchange rate. It points out that high tariffs on the US dollar may reduce global dollar supply, potentially driving the dollar higher in the short term, but the long-term weakening trend of the dollar remains unchanged. At the same time, it analyzes the global development path of digital currencies, with the US leaning towards stablecoins, the European Central Bank insisting on central bank digital currencies, and China advancing central bank digital currencies and strengthening the private sector payment system. While stablecoins have potential, they face challenges such as credit risk, loss of seigniorage, financial system impact, and use in underground economies, and their future status still remains to be observed.
The progress and challenges of RMB internationalization between 2010 and 2015 were discussed, emphasizing the importance of factors such as adjusting financial reform priorities, optimizing international investment positions, and restructuring the industrial chain on the internationalization of the RMB. At the same time, positive trends such as expectations of RMB strength, deepening international monetary cooperation, and the construction of payment systems were mentioned, as well as the complex impact that the US dollar's hegemonic position may bring. The overall outlook for the future opportunities and challenges of RMB internationalization was presented.
Discussed the realistic goal of internationalizing the Renminbi, emphasizing the importance of not seeking to replace the US dollar as the dominant currency, but instead ensuring a sufficient market share to avoid being bullied. Strategies were proposed to address geopolitical challenges and stablecoins, such as the overseas application of retail central bank digital currencies and private sector payment tools, as well as policy choices driven by the market.
The roundtable discussion focuses on the future trends of the US dollar, changes in the global monetary system, and the internationalization process of the Renminbi. Experts predict that the exchange rate of the US dollar against the Renminbi may fluctuate in 2026-2027, and the short-term appreciation space of the Renminbi is limited, relying on long-term domestic policy adjustments. The management model of the US economy and the speed of inflation decline affect the trend of the US dollar, and the appreciation of the Renminbi needs to consider seasonal factors and the economic competition between China and the US.
The discussion focused on the prediction that the US dollar's status as the global reserve currency may decline from 58% to 40% within the next ten years, emphasizing the role of the United States in attracting foreign capital to support the dollar and US bonds. The analysis points out that despite increasing foreign investment from China, the US and Europe remain the main destinations for global investment, and incoming foreign capital has a significant impact on the status of the US dollar.
The relationship between exchange rate adjustments and the reduction of investment restrictions on Chinese enterprises was discussed during the meeting between Chinese and American leaders in April, as well as whether China will follow Japan's exchange rate policy after the Plaza Accord. The analysis suggests that, given the differences between the current economic situations of China and Japan, China is unlikely to adopt a significant appreciation strategy, especially when facing the risk of deflation.
The dialogue discussed the reasons for the decline of the US dollar index, including the slowing economic growth in the United States, the interest rate cuts by the Federal Reserve, the internationalization of the Renminbi, and the high debt of the US government. It pointed out that these factors have led to market doubts about the credibility of the US dollar. At the same time, the future trend of the Renminbi exchange rate was analyzed, predicting that as the US dollar index declines, the Renminbi will show an appreciation trend, possibly reaching 6.5 or even higher.
The conversation discussed the future trend of the Renminbi exchange rate, predicting that the Renminbi will appreciate in 2026, with the market expecting a peak value around 6.8. At the same time, it analyzed the declining trend of the US dollar's position in the global currency system. Although the possibility of the US dollar's share falling below 50% in the short term is small, in the long term, the importance of the US dollar is indeed weakening, providing room for appreciation for currencies such as the Renminbi and Euro.
We discussed the prediction logic of the appreciation of the RMB, based on the current situation of the overvaluation of the US dollar and the undervaluation of the RMB, and proposed a slow appreciation path for the RMB in the long term, emphasizing the manageability of exchange rate adjustment under high-quality development. At the same time, looking forward to the future monetary system, we emphasized the importance of exchange rate adjustment as a mechanism for correcting economic imbalances, and the impact of high-quality development on reducing exchange rate sensitivity.
The challenges facing the US dollar reserve system and the trend of global currency system reform were discussed, pointing out that the attractiveness of RMB assets as a non-traditional fiat currency system depends on the improvement of economic fundamentals. It emphasized China's progress in financial technology and market connectivity, especially the connection between the mainland and Hong Kong markets, providing financing channels for companies in new economic sectors. At the same time, it analyzed that in the context of the decline of the US dollar system, the internationalization of the RMB needs to address domestic economic issues in order to enhance its position in the global currency system.
The importance of economic forecasting in the context of globalization was discussed, particularly emphasizing the value of analyzing economic issues from personal experiences and an international perspective. It highlighted the coexistence of strength and challenges in the U.S. economy, as well as the role of the dollar as a safe haven in times of uncertainty. It mentioned new interpretations of the currency hedging properties in academic research, and the diversification factors to be considered in global asset allocation, such as technology and demographic structure. Lastly, it called for a forward-looking analysis of economic phenomena rather than post-event explanations.
The conversation discussed the predictions for the upcoming meeting between China and the United States in April, and believed that there is an anchor in Sino-US relations, that is, the mutual dependence in the industrial chain, making a hard decoupling not worth the loss. In addition, it mentioned the balanced strategy of technology and consumption in the draft of the 14th Five-Year Plan, as well as the optimism towards high-tech industries such as artificial intelligence and biopharmaceuticals. Finally, the discussion turned to the future prospects of the international monetary system, emphasizing the importance of technological development in the economy.
The challenges faced by the US dollar-dominated international monetary system and its future sustainability were discussed. The growth potential of the RMB in international settlements was analyzed, suggesting that the RMB could become one of the top three payment currencies. At the same time, the investment and financing shortcomings in the internationalization process of the RMB were explored, proposing the establishment of an offshore RMB trading center to accelerate the pace of internationalization, emphasizing the importance of Shanghai as a potential center.
Discussed the future development direction of the global monetary system, emphasized the importance of central bank reserve diversification, especially the potential for increasing gold reserves. Mentioned the interest of developing countries in diversified assets compared to the cautious attitude of European and American clients. Pointed out the advantages of the depth and breadth of the US market, as well as the role of financial instruments in resource reallocation. Expressed pessimism about policy coordination among major economies, while exploring how countries' currencies can influence the future monetary system by developing and extending their own depth and breadth.
The discussion focused on whether the Renminbi exchange rate is undervalued, involving topics such as trade surplus, foreign capital flow, and the internationalization of the Renminbi. Participants believed that a moderate appreciation of the Renminbi would benefit the Chinese economy, but it is necessary to avoid large fluctuations to protect export competitiveness. Policymakers are expected to address issues such as internal circulation and real estate through demand-side policies, while promoting the internationalization of the Renminbi to facilitate two-way capital flow.
要点回答
Q:How does Yuexin Securities lead high-quality development of enterprises through Party building? What are the characteristics of the comprehensive financial service brand "Yuemanjia" of Yuexin Securities?
A:Guangdong Securities adheres to party building as the guiding principle, deeply studies Xi Jinping Thought on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era and the spirit of the 19th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, and carries out six party building actions to promote high-quality development of the company. "Yueguanjia" is a comprehensive financial service brand launched by Guangdong Securities, featuring companion-style services, providing one-stop services such as wealth management and research consultation, aiming to meet customer needs.
Q:What are the unique features of the Hongkou area?
A:Hongkou area has a rich history and cultural heritage, as well as modern vitality. The North Bund area is undergoing evolution and innovation, with a beautiful riverside promenade, making it a bustling place that blends the past with the future.
Q:What challenges and opportunities does the Chinese economy face in the current complex international context?
A:In the unprecedented changes of the past century, China's economy has entered a crucial stage of carrying forward the past and ushering in the future. The technological revolution is accelerating industrial restructuring, and artificial intelligence is reshaping the global competitive landscape, providing new opportunities and challenges for China's economic development.
Q:What are the main functions and achievements of the China Chief Economist Forum?
A:Since its establishment in 2012, the China Chief Economists Forum has successfully held 12 sessions, gathering top chief economists from financial institutions to form a unique research network and influence system. It has submitted numerous internal reference reports to the central government, participated in quarterly economic situation analysis meetings at the State Council's Policy Research Office, and has become an important bridge connecting market voices with policy-making.
Q:What is the geographical location and significance of holding activities in the North Bund of Hongkou, Shanghai?
A:The North Bund of Hongkou in Shanghai is the venue for this forum. Its prime location connects history with the future in a bustling area. Holding the forum here not only reflects attention to regional economic development, but also signals new trends and opportunities in China's economy.
Q:What is the theme and main content of the 2026 conference?
A:The year 2026 will be themed "Hoisting the banner to the end, inheriting the past and ushering in the future, building a strong country." The conference will focus on topics such as financial structure transformation, macroeconomic regulation, global order reconstruction, and improving the quality and efficiency of capital markets. Chief economists from both domestic and international sources will be invited to discuss the direction of China's high-quality economic development.
Q:What are the characteristics and goals of the organizers of the forum Guangdong Securities?
A:Guangdong Securities is committed to providing comprehensive financial services such as wealth management and research consulting, with a focus on customer-centricity, professionalism, and innovation, striving to become a trusted provider of comprehensive financial services for customers.
Q:In terms of going global with our enterprise, how will we optimize financial services to support key areas such as technological innovation, green and low-carbon initiatives, and the financial needs of small and medium-sized enterprises?
A:We will optimize financial services, especially increasing financial support for technological innovation, green low-carbon initiatives, and small and medium-sized enterprises, in order to better serve the high-quality development of the economy and the enhancement of new productivity.
Q:How is the attendance situation of the forum this year?
A:The number of participants who registered for this year's China Chief Economist Forum was very active, with nearly 7,000 frontline insighters and thinkers signing up to participate.
Q:What is the theme of this year's annual meeting?
A:The theme of this year's annual meeting is "Inheriting the past and ushering in the future, building a strong country", aiming to explore forward-looking and constructive ideas for the construction of Shanghai International Financial Center and the high-quality development of China's finance.
Q:How will Mr. Chen Shuai, Deputy District Mayor of Hongkou District, deliver his speech at the annual meeting?
A:Vice Mayor Chen Shuai will represent the People's Government of Hongkou District to deliver a speech at the annual meeting, introducing the development achievements of Hongkou District as the core area of Shanghai International Financial Center construction, and looking forward to guests providing suggestions and ideas around the forum theme to jointly promote regional development.
Q:What is your evaluation of the achievements in the integration of finance and industry in the Hongkou District?
A:Hongkou District has achieved remarkable results in the integration of finance and industry, and has become the core carrier area of Shanghai's global asset management center. It has gathered numerous financial institutions, with a large scale of asset management and active financial innovation, with many national leading platforms settling here.
Q:What points did Mr. Wei Gang, the Secretary General of the China Capital Market Institute, raise in his speech?
A:Mr. Wei Gang believes that building an independent theoretical system for China's capital market is a key issue of the times. He emphasizes the importance of rooting in the national conditions, starting from the conditions of the socialist market economy with Chinese characteristics, deepening the research on the functions, operating characteristics, and laws of the capital market in order to promote high-quality development of the capital market and provide solid financial support for China's modernization in a Chinese way.
Q:What are the main characteristics of the world economy in 2025? What are the specific three major structural root causes?
A:The main characteristics of the world economy in 2025 are as follows: Firstly, growth has become the norm, but the logic of growth has not yet broken. Secondly, the instability of the world economy in 2026 will mainly come from three major structural root causes, including the long-term weakening and imbalance of global growth momentum, the global financial system being in a low fault-tolerant state, and geopolitical economic logic replacing efficiency logic.
The first major structural root cause is the long-term weakening and highly imbalanced global growth momentum. Developed economies are affected by population aging and declining investment returns, while emerging economies face constraints of debt and shrinking development space. This low growth trend is highly differentiated, increasing the difficulty of global system coordination.
The second major structural root cause is that the global financial system is in a low fault-tolerant state. With high interest rates, high debt, and high uncertainty, the buffer space has significantly narrowed, and risks are more likely to manifest as local outbreaks and cross-market transmission.
The third major structural root cause is that geopolitical economic logic is replacing efficiency logic, with some countries systematically politicizing, weaponizing, and tooling trade, investment, technology, and finance, leading the global economy from efficiency-focused to a broad security-oriented direction, forming a globalization model with higher costs, lower efficiency, and greater fragmentation.
Q:How to provide certainty in the face of an uncertain world in China?
A:China should anticipate all risks and maintain its own stable development to provide scarce stability. The five musts proposed at the Central Economic Work Conference are essentially a systematic solution to address external uncertainties with internal certainty. Providing growth certainty at the macro level by expanding domestic demand, optimizing investment structure, and nurturing new quality productivity to maintain a medium-to-high-speed, sustainable, and predictable growth path; providing supply certainty at the industry level, relying on a complete industrial system, continuous iterative technological capabilities, and large-scale application scenarios to provide stable and replicable supply capabilities globally; providing rule certainty at the institutional level through high-level institutional openness to promote regional and multilateral cooperation and reduce institutional friction costs; providing a stable anchor at the financial level by accelerating the internationalization of the Renminbi, regional financial cooperation, and financial regulatory coordination, providing more diverse risk mitigation choices for southern countries globally.
Q:What important historical turning points are currently happening in the financial structure of China?
A:The historical transition of China's financial structure mainly reflects the relationship between direct finance and indirect finance. In recent years, the proportion of incremental indirect finance has gradually decreased, while the proportion of incremental direct finance has increased, especially the growth of direct financing in the corporate sector. The demand for credit in the household and corporate sectors has declined significantly, while the demand for direct financing has maintained rapid growth. This reflects a deep change in the economic structure of China, with increasing demand for direct financing in high-tech industries, strategic emerging industries, and future industries. At the same time, government bond financing has played an important role in the rapid development of direct financing in this round.
Q:How do you view the changing trend of China's financial structure in the future?
A:The proactive fiscal policy in the future will continue and may be more proactive, especially when the international environment is becoming more unstable and uncertain, internal stability becomes particularly important. Therefore, in the next few years and even longer periods, the financing needs of the market in terms of finance will continue to remain significant and will not show obvious contraction.
Q:In the years following 2026, how will the financing needs in traditional sectors change?
A:In the years after 2026, the overall situation in traditional sectors is expected to remain stable and improve to some extent, with traditional financing demand possibly increasing compared to 2025. However, due to changes in economic structure, the real estate industry will no longer generate huge financing demands as it did in the past. Financing demand from the residential sector and property developers may rebound, but it will not return to previous levels. Credit growth may rebound in 2026, but it is still unlikely to exceed a growth rate of 7%.
Q:What is the situation of social financing growth and the changing trend of indirect financing?
A:Social financing is expected to continue growing at a rate of around 12%, with direct financing potentially reaching a growth rate of about 12%. This indicates that the financing scale driven by traditional indirect financing methods may experience a slight rebound, but it is unlikely to return to the past growth rate of 12% to 13%.
Q:What impact will the changes in the development of the capital market have on the future?
A:The development of the future capital market is crucial, as the real economy will continue to have a sustained demand for the capital market with the development of high-tech technologies, especially the growth demand for the bond market and stock market. In 2024, there will be a turning point in policies, and in 2025, the Chinese stock market will steadily recover. It is expected that this trend will continue to advance in 2026. The leading role of a new batch of high-tech industries in the stock market and unprecedented policy support for the stock market, combined with capital outflows from the real estate industry and maintaining loose liquidity, will all contribute to the future continuous improvement of the stock market.
Q:What positive impact does the optimization of the financial structure have on the economy?
A:The optimization of financial structure with the trend of direct financing accounting for more than half brings many benefits to the economy, including but not limited to accelerating economic structural transformation and upgrading, providing stable long-term funding support, effectively reducing financing costs, alleviating corporate debt pressures, improving fund allocation efficiency and economic and financial resilience, promoting financial market development and expanding wealth appreciation paths.
Q:How to solve the problem of debt and leverage through direct financing for long-term development?
A:With the long-term and rapid development of direct financing, its growth rate will be faster than indirect financing, effectively alleviating current issues such as debt problems, leverage issues, and excessive M2 growth rate, and helping to address these problems.
Q:How does economies of scale impact the macroeconomy of China?
A:From the perspective of economies of scale, China is currently facing a dual challenge of ice and fire. Emerging industries are developing rapidly but domestic demand is weak. Economic growth relies on the technological progress and cost reduction brought by economies of scale. The economies of scale effect in China's manufacturing industry is significant, and economies of scale in green industries and artificial intelligence also have a major impact on the global economy. For example, supporting emerging industries through government subsidies, reducing the cost of green energy, and promoting global green transformation. Subsidies and carbon border adjustment mechanisms are two models for promoting the development of green industries, and the Chinese model has shown higher success in the past 20 years.
Q:In the green transition, what is the role of developing large-scale green emerging industries and government support, especially in emerging markets with carbon taxes and carbon trading markets? How does Professor Philip Gain view the impact of AI on economic growth, and what estimation methods are there?
A:I believe that the key to green transformation lies in the development of scale green emerging industries, and government support is necessary. Especially in emerging markets, carbon taxes are relatively moderate, while carbon trading markets are considered an ineffective mechanism due to large price fluctuations. In the field of artificial intelligence, despite controversies, the economies of scale and laws of AI are apparent. The ongoing discussion about whether AI is a bubble or not. Professor Philip Gain estimates the impact of AI on economic growth through extrapolation and a task-based approach. Extrapolation refers to historical revolutions such as electricity and telecommunications, predicting that AI will bring global economic growth of 0.8 to 1.3 percentage points per year by 2024. The task-based approach focuses on specific aspects of AI replacing human behavior, with an estimated growth rate of 0.08 to 1.24 percentage points.
Q:How is the contribution of future economic growth in China estimated in the AI Economics report released by the Chinese Academy of Sciences?
A:The AI Economics Report released by the Central Research Institute in 2024 adopts a method similar to s m o g a, but places more emphasis on cost reduction and the future enhancement of AI capabilities. The estimate suggests that for China, AI may potentially bring an average annual economic growth of 0.8 percentage points in the future.
Q:Under the new situation, what are the challenges facing the supply and demand sides, especially how do geopolitical economic changes affect the international trade pattern?
A:From 2019 to 2024, U.S. trade protectionism towards China led to a significant decrease in its import share from China, while the import share from Russia and other countries such as Africa, Latin America, and Southeast Asia increased. This indicates that changes in geopolitical economy have prompted our country's trading partners to shift from the West to the Belt and Road region, forming a new closed-loop external circulation model, where exports are no longer just consumer goods but rather more investment goods, forming equity rather than debt assets.
Q:What are the reasons for weak demand in the current domestic cycle, and how should fiscal and monetary policies work together to be effective?
A:The fundamental reason for the current weak domestic demand is the downward financial cycle, with real estate debt issues leading to a tendency for businesses and individuals to pay off debt rather than invest in consumption. Additionally, the indirect financing model mainly used makes it difficult for banks to generate loan demand in an economic downturn. Therefore, coordinated fiscal and monetary policies are very important, as fiscal injections of external currency and adjustments to tax and transfer payment arrangements can effectively boost domestic demand.
Q:What are the important aspects of the importance of fiscal injection of foreign currency?
A:The importance of injecting foreign currency into the economy lies in the fact that besides financing, bank credit can also create currency providing liquidity assets, which cannot be achieved through direct financing. Especially in the current process of transitioning from direct financing to indirect financing, fiscal expansion can ensure an increase in money supply, thereby enhancing economic vitality.
Q:What is the role of the social security system in regulating income distribution?
A:Currently, the social security system in China has limited impact on reducing the income incentive coefficient, especially the social security system for low-income groups is not yet perfect. Therefore, improving the disposable income of low-income groups and strengthening the social security system play a crucial role in promoting common prosperity and narrowing income gaps, which also requires active participation and adjustment of fiscal policies.
Q:How can monetary policy cooperate with fiscal policy, and can we understand this from the relationship between bond issuance and central bank liquidity injection?
A:Currently, the net issuance of financial bonds is basically synchronized with the liquidity injection by the central bank. The net issuance of government securities matches the liquidity injection by the central bank, but there was a special situation in 2024 because the decrease in bond yields led to concerns about a financial crisis, causing the central bank to reduce its liquidity injection.
Q:What is your opinion on the fiscal deficit rate in China?
A:Ten years ago, I proposed in an article that our country's fiscal deficit rate could reach 4% or even higher, because at that time the caution line was 3%, and this 3% caution line had no economic basis, it was stipulated in the Maastricht Treaty when the European Union was formed. According to the latest data predictions, if we include factors such as local government special bonds and special national bonds, the broad deficit rate could be as high as 8% or more, so I believe that under the current circumstances, it is helpful to stabilize the economy by appropriately increasing the deficit rate.
Q:What are the requirements of the Central Economic Work Conference on fiscal policy?
A:The Central Economic Work Conference emphasizes maintaining a necessary scale of fiscal deficit and total debt, as well as total expenditure. It is expected that the fiscal deficit rate will not weaken in 2020, and the expansionary policy stance will continue to be implemented.
Q:Why does our country's financial sector prefer to cut reserve requirement rather than significantly reduce interest rates?
A:The financial sector needs to strike a balance between supporting the real economy and maintaining its own health, especially since real estate has become a significant risk. If problems arise in the financial sector, it will have a serious impact on the national economy as a whole. In addition, our country relies mainly on indirect financing and pays high attention to banking risks. Therefore, the approach taken is gradual reserve requirement reductions rather than significant interest rate cuts to ensure the stability of the financial system.
Q:What are the reasons why our country does not have the basis for a sustained large-scale interest rate cuts? Why is our country not inclined to make significant interest rate cuts?
A:The main reasons include that consumption and investment have low elasticity to interest rates, so lowering interest rates is difficult to effectively promote increased consumption and investment; at the same time, the narrowing of interest margins in commercial banks and a significant decrease in interest rates can increase the pressure on net interest margins, affecting the healthy operation of financial institutions. In addition, China has a large adjustment space for reserve requirement ratio, compared to the United States, China no longer has a statutory reserve requirement ratio and has room for further reserve requirement ratio cuts. Because consumption and investment in China have low elasticity to interest rates, lowering interest rates may not significantly increase consumption and investment, but may instead lead to deposits being transferred to wealth management, stock markets, and other channels rather than directly stimulating consumption and investment. Additionally, considering economic cycles, price levels, exchange rate factors, and the role of structural monetary policy tools, China has chosen to gradually and steadily lower interest rates, while optimizing credit structures through structural monetary policy tools to support technological innovation and weak economic sectors.
Q:In the current economic situation, where do you think the key to improving residents' income lies?
A:The key to increasing residents' income lies in optimizing income distribution, especially addressing the root cause of weak consumption. This is related to three aspects: consumption capacity, consumption willingness, and the adaptability of supply to consumption. Among them, consumption capacity is closely related to income distribution, consumption willingness is related to the reform of public resources and fiscal expenditure structure, and the adaptability of supply to consumption is related to market access and property rights protection of enterprises.
Q:In the period of new energy conversion, why should we pay attention to the differentiation of employment and income?
A:During the period of transition from old to new economic drivers, as technological advancements drive up productivity levels and supply capabilities significantly, the new economic drivers are mainly capital-intensive and technology-intensive rather than labor-intensive. This means that some workers are unable to integrate into the wave of technological development, leading to a differentiation in employment and income, further exacerbating the imbalance between supply and demand.
Q:What are the basic characteristics of the distribution of national income in China?
A:The basic characteristics of income distribution in China are that the income of the household sector accounts for the highest proportion among the three major sectors (households, enterprises, and government). However, in international comparison, the proportion of household income in both primary distribution and redistribution in China is at a medium-low level. The share of labor compensation in national income is relatively high in China, but it is also at a medium-slightly low level globally. The low proportion of property income is the main reason why household income distribution in China is lower than in countries such as the United States, especially the need to further increase the proportion of interest income and equity income.
Q:In recent years, how has the distribution of income among Chinese residents changed? What are your views on the distribution of income between enterprise and government sectors?
A:Since 2008, the proportion of China's residents' income distribution has increased. Looking at the data from 2016, the proportion of residents' income distribution has increased by five percentage points. This is mainly due to the labor shortage of migrant workers leading to higher labor prices, as well as the peak and decline of the labor age population leading to an increase in the share of labor compensation in income distribution. The income share of China's corporate sector is relatively high internationally, which is related to China being a socialist state with state-owned enterprises playing an important role in counter-cyclical adjustments. At the same time, the proportion of dividends and financial contributions from state-owned enterprises also needs to be increased. On the other hand, the income share of the government sector is relatively low, which is related to China's implementation of policies such as tax cuts, reductions in fees, and adjustments in the real estate market leading to a decrease in relevant tax revenue.
Q:How will the proportion of low-level regions in government income distribution change by 2025, and is it a good thing?
A:It is expected that this ratio will further decrease by 2025, which indicates that reducing the macro tax burden helps alleviate the burden on residents and businesses, but lower is not always better. Because continuously reducing the level of macro taxation may limit public services and macroeconomic control capabilities, leading to a decrease in income, increased deficits due to rigid spending, or an increase in special debt. Therefore, the government's low-level fiscal situation should be viewed rationally, and a reasonable macro tax rate should be maintained.
Q:What is the current scale and proportion of personal income tax in China, and is its ability to regulate income distribution limited?
A:Currently, the scale of personal income tax in our country is 1.4 trillion, accounting for only 8% of tax revenue. It is very low compared to the total fiscal revenue of 22 trillion. Due to the small number of individual income tax payers, only in the tens of millions, the ability to adjust the income distribution of 1.4 billion people is limited. If the tax exemption threshold continues to be raised, it may lead to fewer and fewer taxpayers, and the direct tax adjustment ability for income distribution will further decrease.
Q:What are the reasons for the low proportion of direct taxes and the importance of constructing property taxes?
A:The ratio of direct taxes in our country is relatively low. Apart from personal income tax, property tax is also low, especially inheritance and gift taxes have not yet been officially included in the agenda. The construction of property tax is crucial for optimizing the income distribution pattern.
Q:What are the basic characteristics of China's national income distribution pattern?
A:There are four basic characteristics of the distribution pattern of national income: residents have the largest share of income; residents' income is relatively low, mainly due to low property income; business income is high; government income is low.
Q:What are the main factors determining the pattern of national income distribution?
A:The distribution pattern of national income is mainly influenced by the stage of development and resource endowment, for example, during periods of supply shortages in the past, institutional design tended to increase the supply of capital, while in the current phase of insufficient demand, it is necessary to increase the proportion of labor compensation to address demand shortages.
Q:How does industrial structure affect income distribution patterns?
A:The industrial structure determines the pattern of income distribution. Labor-intensive industries such as agriculture and services will increase the proportion of residents' income, while capital-intensive industries such as manufacturing may lead to an increase in the proportion of corporate income, showing a U-shaped change.
Q:Types of global income distribution patterns, and explore how to optimize income distribution in China?
A:There are three main types of global income distribution patterns, namely the British-American model (high resident income, high degree of labor marketization), the Japanese-Korean model (high corporate income, chaebol economy), and the Norwegian and Finnish model (high government income, high welfare). The key to optimizing income distribution in our country lies in seeking a balance between people's welfare, corporate supply capacity, and government macroeconomic control capabilities, rather than unlimited expansion of a single proportion.
Q:How to enable departments in enterprises to offer benefits to residents through mechanisms?
A:Suggestions for making concessions include the following: first, starting with state-owned enterprises, significantly increase contributions to the government for social security system construction; second, focusing on listed companies, encourage dividends and stock incentives to increase residents' property income; third, improve the long-term mechanism for wage growth, implement plans to increase income for urban and rural residents; fourth, study and explore the establishment of a special fund for increasing income for urban and rural residents with central financial support, providing appropriate subsidies to companies for salary increases; fifth, adjust the distribution path of financial resources, such as raising salaries for those still working and adjusting retirement benefits; sixth, gradually reduce the subsidy levels for pension funds for different groups; seventh, strengthen physical redistribution, and increase investment in education and other fields.
Q:What suggestions do you have for the direction of personal income tax reform?
A:The reform of personal income tax should shift from basic deduction to additional deductions, such as considering deductions for dependents with non-working spouses, and gradually shift from classified collection to comprehensive collection. At the same time, improve the system for property income, study inheritance and gift taxes, enhance the regulatory function of direct taxes, and further increase the redistribution of tangible assets.
Q:From your perspective, how do you interpret the importance of the "Fourteenth Five-Year Plan" in our country for the next five years and its role in the national development in the next 5 to 10 years, or even longer?
A:From two perspectives. First, from the perspective of per capita income, if we can maintain steady growth, we are expected to further approach the level of middle-income developed countries by 2035, challenging the narrative of the "middle-income trap". Secondly, from the perspective of industries, during the "14th Five-Year Plan" period, we are at the forefront of technological revolution, such as catching up in the fields of renewable energy, artificial intelligence, etc., which will have profound impacts on industrial development.
Q:What are the aspects in which the importance of the "14th Five-Year Plan" is reflected?
A:In terms of time significance, "the 14th Five-Year Plan" is a new stage after the completion of a moderately prosperous society in the previous 100 years, facing new opportunities and challenges, and laying the foundation for building a socialist modernized country by 2035. In terms of spatial significance, it is a process of rebalancing, aiming to reshape the supply curve to promote high-quality development, while emphasizing the importance of human roles, enhancing consumption and investment efficiency to shape a better demand curve.
Q:What are the specific manifestations of the importance of the "14th Five-Year Plan"?
A:The importance of the "14th Five-Year Plan" is reflected in seven aspects: the turning point period for peaking carbon emissions, the turning point period for urbanization, the decisive period for clearing hidden debts, the period of tackling internal and external risks, the deepening period of enterprises going global, the accelerating period of technological innovation, and the period of prolonged strategic competition between China and the United States.
Q:From the perspective of foreign investment, what important significance does the "14th Five-Year Plan" have for China?
A:The past year marked a turning point in the narrative surrounding China, with overseas investors shifting their attitude towards Chinese investment from one that deemed it uninvestable to now viewing Chinese assets as an unavoidable investment choice. Over the past five years, strategic goals have been steadily achieved through a series of five-year plans, leading to a deeper understanding among overseas investors of China's cyclical policies and an increased focus on long-term planning.
Q:What are the opportunities and challenges in the next five years for China's economic development, industrial upgrade, and the Sino-US confrontation?
A:Opportunities include industrialization in southern countries (such as the growth in demand for engineering machinery, agricultural machinery, etc.), globalization of Chinese enterprises (further expanding overseas markets), AI scenarioization (opening up downstream application space), and increasing consumption rates (optimizing income distribution, improving consumption infrastructure, implementing paid staggered vacations to nurture new consumption hotspots). The main challenge lies in how to gracefully bid farewell to the traditional growth model that relied on real estate and other traditional driving forces in the past, and face the problems brought about by adjustments in the debt cycle.
Q:In terms of debt cycle and future development, where do you think the core of China's debt problem lies? How to solve the employment impact that AI development may bring?
A:I believe that beneath the apparent debt issues in China lies a core problem with assets. We need to focus on debt allocation and restructuring on the asset side. There are three solutions: first, embrace AI and technological advancements while avoiding excessive reliance that could lead to the replacement of human value; second, pre-emptively establish a social security network, focusing on employment security for different groups such as young people, middle-aged people, etc.; third, combat internal competition, improve labor efficiency, stabilize employment positions, and strengthen the enforcement of labor laws.
Q:How do you evaluate the process of asset reevaluation in China and its impact on the future?
A:Starting from 2019, Chinese equity assets have been re-evaluated to nearly 35 trillion yuan, with revaluations in fields like real estate still ongoing. The process of risk clearing is crucial in the next five years and will bring adjustments in supply and demand, balance between domestic demand and external demand, as well as balance between assets and liabilities.
Q:What is your opinion on the development of artificial intelligence and the new economy in the future?
A:Artificial intelligence and the new economy are overwhelming themes in the capital market, from great power competition to the transition of old and new driving forces, all of which have significant historical significance. Currently, the progress that China has made in the field of artificial intelligence, such as good model performance, relatively low training costs and computing power requirements, and an increase in self-sufficiency in AI chips, shows a narrowing gap with the United States. It is expected that in the future, only China and the United States may be the main centers of the new economy globally.
Q:What impact does the new economy have on China's macroeconomy?
A:The development of the new economy has already had macro significance, for example, the AI-related capital expenditure last year contributed 0.4 percentage points to GDP growth, and its scale has exceeded the direct and indirect contribution of real estate to the economy. This has changed the market and macro understanding of China's growth.
Q:Is the rise of the new economy having a negative impact on the microemployment market?
A:Despite the rapid development of the new economy, it seems that there has not been a significant improvement in residents' confidence and employment expectations at the micro level. In fact, a large number of positions are disappearing and being added at the same time, leading to instability in the job market. Therefore, we need to pay attention to the different implications of the rise of the new economy on both macro and micro levels, embracing AI and the new economy while avoiding the "Turing trap" to prevent a cliff-like drop in human value due to technological advances.
Q:Under the carbon peak and carbon neutrality goals, what are the opportunities and challenges for the next five years?
A:Over the next five years, six major carbon governance mechanisms (six carbon mechanisms) will be gradually established, including local carbon assessment, industry carbon control, enterprise carbon management, etc. The accuracy of carbon accounting and the development of related markets (carbon market and electricity market) are important opportunities. At the same time, attention should be paid to potential opportunities and challenges brought by the development of national territory (such as the revitalization of Xinjiang and Northeast), changes in financial structure (such as the challenges of Shanghai as a financial center), and the improvement of macro-control capabilities.
Q:What changes will there be in fixed asset investment in 2026?
A:In 2026, the country proposed optimizing measures for the landing of major projects, and the Central Economic Work Conference emphasized that investment this year should stabilize after the decline. Last year, fixed asset investment mainly contracted in economically large provinces, and policy financial instruments were mainly used in these areas. It is expected that a large number of projects will start in March at the beginning of spring, which will have a significant impact on the upstream and downstream industrial chains. If fixed asset investment can be repaired, it will be an important clue.
Q:What new policies are there in 2026 to combat overwork culture?
A:In the Central Economic Work Conference in 2026, it was proposed to further rectify the inwardly spiraling competition. The Producer Price Index (PPI) data has seen a positive growth for the fifth consecutive month, providing imagination space for policy to intensify efforts against inwardly spiraling competition. If the anti-inward spiral measures continue to progress, prices in industries such as construction, new energy, automotive, computer, and electronics may bottom out and start to rise again.
Q:What are the investment logics or industry directions worth paying attention to in 2026?
A:Pay attention to the development of AI applications in China because it has a wide range of application scenarios; breakthroughs in the field of technological innovation, especially investment opportunities related to VC and technology stocks; technological self-reliance and basic research, such as controlled nuclear fusion and quantum technology; the field of big finance, especially how to effectively manage in the era of asset management; and the re-balancing of valuation in cyclical industries.
Q:What are your opinions on investing in the old economy and the new economy?
A:Currently, the market believes that the old economy sectors are cheap enough and the value is highlighted, but the turning point in the fundamentals has not yet arrived. Between the new economy and the old economy, the general view is that before seeing the old economy recovery, it is still inclined to embrace the new economy. However, when participating in new economy themes, more attention should be paid to technology governance, including ethical and security issues brought about by technological breakthroughs, and incorporate them into the investment framework.
Q:What are the investment opportunities in the next five years and in 2026?
A:Opportunities mainly include mergers and industry consolidation brought about by anti-overwork, Pleasant 50 going global, VC and technology stocks corresponding to scientific innovation, REITs or REITs-like investments corresponding to asset activation, and golden opportunities under major unprecedented changes in a century.
Q:What specific investment prospects are there for the year 2026?
A:In 2026, there will be increased subsidies in the consumer sector, and it is also expected that there will be incremental investments in infrastructure. In addition, attention will be paid to the implementation of the 2025 manufacturing plan and opportunities brought about by rising commodity prices.
Q:Introduction about index and new book releases?
A:The Chief Index has been released, which is based on multidimensional economic data compilation, providing a reference for macroeconomic analysis. At the same time, the "Towards the Fifteenth Five-Year Plan - Globalization and Great Changes" series of books have been released, including books that comprehensively interpret the framework of the Fifteenth Five-Year Plan and strategic analysis for coping with the changes in globalization, providing deep insights for policymakers, market practitioners, and various readers in society.
Q:What new products will the Chief Forum launch in the future? What are the main contents of the products of the Chief Forum?
A:The Chief Forum will launch a series of new products in the future, including Chief Consulting, Chief Salon, Chief Face-to-Face, and Chief Study Abroad. The products of the Chief Forum mainly include three core contents: Firstly, the monthly Chief Core Viewpoint, which summarizes the research judgments of hundreds of chief economists to help grasp macro trends and policy dynamics; secondly, the annual release of fund investment white papers and other financial works; and thirdly, the monthly updated Chief Online Think Tank, inviting chief economists to interpret and discuss hot topics through live broadcasts.
Q:How to access the professional information and services provided by the Chief Economist Forum?
A:All content will be packaged within membership benefits, and subscribed to the content account's product showcase on platforms such as WeChat and TikTok. In addition, after lunch, everyone is required to return to the main venue to prepare for the afternoon meeting.
Q:What topics will be the focus of the afternoon session? What are the main changes in the global political and economic landscape?
A:The afternoon session will focus on core topics such as the global political and economic changes and the restructuring of the supply chain, as well as the reform of the monetary system, with special attention to geopolitical issues. The strategic shift by the United States is a key part of the global political and economic changes, manifesting as the largest strategic contraction since the Cold War, shifting towards emphasizing Latin America as its sphere of influence, and adopting a transactional diplomatic policy rather than the previous values-based diplomacy. This suggests that future competition between China and the United States will shift from a life-or-death struggle to a struggle for dominance, especially in the Latin American region. The United States may increase its intervention in the region, such as by strengthening pressure on countries like Venezuela, while also trying to prevent the infiltration of other countries' influence in the region.
Q:What is the current security strategy of the United States and its impact on the world?
A:The United States is currently implementing a "America First" strategy, reducing overseas military commitments, and withdrawing from international organizations that do not serve American interests through the signing of memorandums. In the future, there may be further actions such as regime change and territorial annexation, strengthening the plundering of resources from other countries, and not allowing external forces to interfere with its interests in its hemisphere. This will have a significant impact on countries around the world, including China and Latin America.
Q:What is the current international situation like?
A:The current international situation is changing from "one superpower with many strong countries" to "two superpowers with many strong countries", with emerging forces led by China rising, while the United States still maintains significant military, high-tech, and currency hegemony. However, with the rise of right-wing forces in Western countries, there is a fundamental change in international power, and a historic turning point of the rise of the East and fall of the West is gradually emerging. In the future, there may be a multipolar structure where both China and the US stand together, with the participation of the European Union, Russia, Japan, India, and other countries as well as global Southern forces.
Q:From the perspective of both military and economy, what is the impact of the United States increasing military budget on the global arms race in the current global political and economic changes? In terms of global economic competition, what changes are there in the current balance of power?
A:After the United States increases its budget to 1.5 trillion dollars in 2027, it may trigger a new round of global arms race in 2026, especially as the relative decline of European power. Economic hegemony is being reshaped, with the proportion of GDP of BRICS countries and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization rising significantly, while the proportion of the European Union in the global economy is declining rapidly. The proportion of the US GDP has always remained at about a quarter, but Trump's policies have led to a decrease in its global influence.
Q:What are the reasons for the United States initiating a trade war?
A:The United States believes that raising tariffs can effectively offset its trade deficit issue. They think that previous tariff levels were too low, and with changes in the economic situation, especially the need to reduce reliance on allies, they have taken action by pulling the trigger.
Q:What advantages does China have in Sino-US economic and trade relations?
A:China has abundant rare earth resources, especially in the field of medium and heavy rare earths, which play an important role in the military industry. Therefore, it may be the only country capable of negotiating with the United States.
Q:What are the important statements and changes in our country's five-year plan?
A:In the planning process, it is emphasized to comprehensively promote the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation through Chinese-style modernization, drive a significant increase in comprehensive national strength and international influence, and make science and technology as well as openness the core focus. It is proposed to construct a unified national market, enhance the consumption rate of residents, and adopt unconventional methods to break through technological bottlenecks.
Q:What are the aspects that reflect the importance of domestic demand for China?
A:Domestic demand is crucial to the Chinese economy, especially in extreme circumstances, where an economy that can self-sustain like Russia's appears stronger. China is promoting a national unified large market and an international and domestic dual circulation strategy to enhance its domestic demand and self-sustaining capabilities.
Q:What role does technology play in the current international competition?
A:Technology has become a key factor in the change of great powers, with the transfer cycle of technology centers being approximately 80 to 100 years. Currently, China's technological development has posed a challenge to the United States, making breakthroughs in the field of technology crucial for China's position in global competition.
Q:What is the impact of the United States' exports to China?
A:Although the proportion of exports from the United States to China has been continuously decreasing, the total trade volume of China is still increasing. The structure has changed, and the trade war and technology war have actually promoted the diversification of Chinese trade and the upgrading of the commodity structure.
Q:What changes could there be in the future direction of funds flow?
A:It is expected that future funds may be re-adjusted on a global scale, with increasing flows into safe countries and major powers such as China. Particularly in 2026, when small countries will face pressure, the role of funds in supporting the secondary market will become more prominent.
Q:What impact does the artificial intelligence revolution have on macroeconomic theory?
A:The artificial intelligence revolution is overturning the traditional production function of economics, with a large amount of labor being replaced by intelligence. This is causing existing macroeconomic theories and models to become obsolete, and the future world will enter a new stage dominated by grand narratives and competition between G2 countries.
Q:Can you estimate how much the stock market can rise this year?
A:This is difficult to predict. I usually answer "Bayes" (based on real-time changes in the scores of Sino-US games), although I firmly believe that the prevailing wind will blow to the east in the long run, short-term forecasts are uncertain.
Q:Can you provide a specific prediction for the current stock market situation?
A:I am not sure how much it can rise specifically, I can only watch while walking, because the situation during the competition is constantly changing in real time.
Q:What are the focal points of the AI industrial revolution?
A:The focus is on the transformation of computing power supply and how to transform accumulated technological potential into business logic, forming a complete industrial ecosystem so that the capital invested in the front end can be recovered and form an economic cycle.
Q:What are the core elements of AI competition?
A:The core elements are electrical power and manufacturing capability. Whoever can possess these two things and complete the mission of the AI industry revolution will have the last laugh.
Q:What is the most noticeable in the current global asset class performance?
A:The most notable is the 70% increase in the price of gold, reaching $4,500 per ounce, which reflects concerns about the trustworthiness of the global capital in the US dollar credit system.
Q:Why hasn't the US dollar collapsed?
A:The reason the US dollar has not collapsed is because the United States has put all its national fate and gold credit in the field of artificial intelligence, and the market value growth of the science and technology AI chain has supported the credit status of the US dollar.
Q:Who is responsible for completing the final mission of the AI industrial revolution in science and technology?
A:Americans may not be able to complete this mission because of a lack of manufacturing industry. Instead, this responsibility falls on the shoulders of the Eastern superpower (China), which will establish a strong and comprehensive industrial ecosystem in AI terminals, allowing the capital invested in the front end to circulate and form a closed loop.
Q:What role does China play in the technological revolution of the AI industry?
A:China will integrate open-source large-scale model bases and ecosystems into various cost-effective and beautiful hardware peripherals to promote the penetration of AI, continuously optimize AI through scenarios and data, and then drive the expansion cycle of digital assets and new credit.
Q:What are the underlying premises on which the order of globalization in the past 30 years was built? Which ones are irreversible and have been broken?
A:The order of globalization over the past 30 years has mainly been established in four aspects: the free flow of goods, the free flow of capital, the free flow of people, and the free flow of information. However, in reality, during these decades, the only aspects that have truly achieved free flow are the trade of goods and the flow of capital. The free flow of people has never been realized, and there are also many countries that choose to isolate themselves in terms of the free flow of information. Some of the ideal arrangements in the post-war system, such as GATT's management of goods trade to the WTO, the IMF balancing international payments, and the World Bank providing financial support, have limited influence in the current process of globalization. The real driving force comes from zero tariffs on goods trade and the opening up of capital projects.
Q:How has the United States influenced the changes in globalization?
A:The United States has become a key player in recent global changes. Since 2018, the United States has adopted a more confrontational approach in the field of trade, contrasting with other non-American countries. In the past, the United States was one of the main driving forces behind globalization, but now its attitude towards globalization has changed significantly. It has not only become the country with the highest global tariff rates, but also increased its revenue through tariffs. This indicates a shift in the structural role of the United States in the process of globalization.
Q:What will China's role be in the future of globalization and how can it address the issue of global trade imbalances?
A:China is a deep participant in globalization, but for a long time it has not been the driving force behind globalization. Faced with the challenges of anti-globalization, China needs to consider how to ensure that most countries can still benefit from globalization and address the imbalance between surpluses and deficits. A high-quality strategy for opening up to the outside world, including joint ventures and cooperation with local investors, expanding imports and other win-win models, can help maintain the growth of global trade volume and avoid moving in a pessimistic direction.
Q:In the past decade, what phenomenon did China's trade conditions, especially the decline in imports, bring about?
A:The rapid decline in imports indicates that China's competitive advantage has significantly increased. Now China has formed advantages in all industries, fields, and against all countries, no longer relying on anything from abroad.
Q:What are the driving forces behind globalization? Will globalization continue in the future?
A:The early driving force of globalization mainly came from the promotion of China and the United States after 1990. However, by 2008, this trend began to change as the United States started deleveraging due to issues such as trade deficits and budget deficits, leading to a significant reduction in household sector debt levels and a reluctance to take on the leading role in globalization. Additionally, the increasing importance of security logic at the political level has caused globalization to lose an important driving force. It is estimated that globalization has been ongoing for 20 years and may continue in this trend for the next 10 to 20 years.
Q:What are the three pillars on which globalization was built? What changes have happened to them now?
A:Globalization is built on three main pillars: the United States providing public security goods and acting as a rule maker and beneficiary; the global trade rules system of the WTO, in which China is also a beneficiary; and the free flow of global capital, manpower, and technology. However, now, investment perspectives must also take into account regional security considerations, the global energy structure may undergo significant changes, and the dominance of the United States in the financial sector may also move towards diversification. These trends are difficult to avoid.
Q:The shift of the focus of the US national security strategy towards the Western Hemisphere, does it mean the rise of a new colonial mindset or an obstacle to China's further development as a cornerstone?
A:From an investment perspective, the shift in the strategic focus of the United States reflects its intention to reshape energy and mineral resources and financial control, demonstrating a defensive hegemonic strategy, and even resorting to surprise attacks. This may result in a change in the global energy structure and a redistribution of control in the financial sector, potentially leading to a gradual diversification of the US dollar's hegemonic status.
Q:Will the United States take military or economic actions against Greenland?
A:The actions of the United States towards countries such as Venezuela demonstrate its strategic focus and determination. There is discussion on whether similar actions will be taken towards Greenland. However, from a strategic perspective, the United States' strategic focus may be defensive rather than contracting, focused on energy and technology fields. This may also address issues related to the US dollar and US debt credit. In the long term, it may have an impact on gold and digital currencies.
Q:The strategic focus of the United States is shifting to Europe, including Greenland. Will this shift ultimately be successful in revitalizing the American manufacturing industry or in obtaining a large amount of resources?
A:The shift in the United States national security strategy reflects a fundamental change in the assessment of national security, rather than a simple strategic contraction or shift. While some of the actions of the Trump administration may appear to be beneficial for reshoring manufacturing and resource acquisition, the success of this strategic shift from a European perspective, as well as the ability to truly revitalize American manufacturing, remains uncertain.
Q:In the United States' latest national security strategy, what is the status of economic security?
A:In the latest national security strategy of the United States, economic security has been placed at an unprecedented high priority. It is believed that the biggest source of insecurity for the United States currently comes from economic insecurity, including concerns about energy and manufacturing. This focus on economic insecurity has affected its military strength and overall national security, leading to a shift in strategic focus towards enhancing economic security, at the expense of other aspects such as value coordination and relationships with allies.
Q:What is Europe's reaction to such a transformation in the United States?
A:Europe feels very uncomfortable because it originally thought it shared common values with the United States, but now the United States not only interferes in European values but also economically interferes. This makes Europe feel awkward in its attitude.
Q:What are the different opinions in the United States on the foreign policy of the Trump administration?
A:In the United States, there are different opinions within the Republican and Democratic parties regarding the foreign policy of the Trump administration. Despite President Trump taking a series of actions involving expansion and strategic focus, the Republican and Democratic parties have different views on how to handle these policies and relationships with other countries.
Q:What is the behavior pattern of the Trump administration?
A:The behavior pattern of the Trump administration is characterized by once they start a certain action, such as a trade war or involvement in Venezuelan affairs, they typically continue to push forward until the goal is achieved, and they rarely encounter effective resistance. Trump is adept at promoting his achievements through social media and using actual actions to increase fiscal revenue and adjust trade imbalances.
Q:What key variables may affect the future trajectory of Sino-US relations in the next five years?
A:Key variables include the macroeconomic situation, especially the current GDP growth rate, inflation, employment rate, and international balance of payments indicators. In addition, comparative advantages at the industrial level are also very important, but more importantly is the proper use of macroeconomic policies, which will determine the positions of China and the United States in the global political-economic game. At the same time, the development of AI technology and its impact on the economies of both countries will be one of the most decisive factors in the next five years.
Q:What major impact will AI have on Sino-American relations in the next five years?
A:AI will become the most important variable affecting the relationship between China and the United States in the next five years, as it will determine the competitive advantage of the two countries. Although AI technology is developing rapidly, the specific level of development in the next five years is uncertain, including the risk of a partial or comprehensive bubble burst, and how this fluctuation will affect the economies and job markets of the countries.
Q:Is it possible for Trump to have a hot war with a superpower, and what is the policy intent of Japanese Prime Minister Taro Aso?
A:From Trump's perspective, he is unlikely to engage in a hot war with a superpower easily, but Japanese political figures such as Takashi Nagaya may try to push for the further development of Japan's military, break free from US military control, and increase friction with China. However, overall, the probability of a hot war in the next five years is not high.
Q:What will the future strategic situation between China and the United States be like?
A:The game between China and the United States may enter a deep water area, especially in the financial field, and be influenced by external political factors. The two countries compete in terms of overall macroeconomic and structural technology, for example, the United States is facing high inflation problems, while China has advantages on the production side, but there are issues in terms of domestic demand, private sector growth, etc., which need to be addressed in order to maintain economic health and take the initiative.
Q:How can China and the United States solve their own economic problems?
A:For the United States, it is necessary to address the issue of high inflation and reduce the shortcomings in the manufacturing industry; for China, it is important to focus on supply-side reform, solve the economic growth rate, especially the bottoming out of private sector growth, low prices, and unstable social expectations.
Q:What impact does expanding domestic demand have on Sino-US relations?
A:Expanding domestic demand not only helps to boost domestic consumption and investment, but also allows other countries to profit from China by increasing imports, thereby reducing reliance on the United States, expanding the global circle of friends, and increasing the odds of success in international economic and trade struggles.
Q:What are your views on investment in technology and independent innovation?
A:In the next five years, there will be a dynamic game between technology blockade and independent innovation, and the two countries will intensify competition within a limited scope of cooperation. China has made significant progress in areas such as semiconductors and is working hard to fill gaps and catch up with the United States in areas of strength.
Q:What are the impacts of asset price predictions and great power games?
A:It is expected that the capital markets (including A shares and H shares) will have great opportunities in 2026, especially in the first half of the year. Uncertainty and volatility in asset prices are increasing. The investment focus should be on domestic substitution and independent innovation, especially in industries such as new energy, batteries, photovoltaic components, and 5G communication. In addition, basic metals and rare metals are seen favorably due to the growth in demand for preparation, and gold also has the potential to rise due to security logic, but attention should be paid to the risks brought by liquidity drivers and geopolitical changes. Meanwhile, central banks in various countries expanding their balance sheets will drive up stock valuations, and the performance of the stock market is expected to be good.
Q:What is your opinion on the US dollar?
A:We expect the US dollar to continue to weaken and become a relatively weak currency. The main reason is the large trade deficit in the United States, which requires continuous inflow of funds to maintain the strength of the dollar. However, due to various disturbances and policy uncertainties, inflows of funds from other developed countries to the United States are decreasing and this trend may continue, therefore the possibility of the US dollar weakening is high.
Q:How will the Chinese yuan change in the future?
A:We expect the RMB to strengthen, as a result of the weakening US dollar and improved prices due to China's internal policy efforts. In addition, the global trend of legal currency depreciation relative to tangible assets may push up global inflation, which is a positive signal for China. Therefore, inflation may be a good direction for asset allocation this year.
Q:Which stock market, the US or China, has risen more this year?
A:Both the US stock market and A shares have the potential to rise, but the specific performance needs to consider risk-weighted volatility. The central bank mentioned that the China Investment Corporation will play the role of a sovereign wealth fund, which may affect the performance of both. The US stock market may rise more than A shares in some time periods, but in terms of volatility, considering the stability of A shares, the cost-effectiveness of A shares may be higher.
Q:What is your opinion on metal assets such as precious metals and some basic metals?
A:I am more optimistic about the performance of precious metals and base metals, especially when the price of gold rises, other rare metals will also rise, among which silver will have a greater elasticity in performance. In addition, the industrialization process of Southern countries around the world is accelerating, driving the increase in infrastructure and industrial demand, which will have a positive impact on metal consumption and continue the overall upward trend seen this year.
Q:How did the global imbalance situation come about?
A:The essence of globalization in the past 40 years has essentially resulted in a global imbalance, with some economies experiencing large trade surpluses while others are experiencing deficits. This situation is a result of the evolution of the international monetary system, especially after the decoupling of the US dollar from gold in 1971 and the entry into the modern Jamaica system, making global imbalances possible.
Q:What are the characteristic features behind global imbalances? What are the key factors supporting globalization and global imbalances?
A:The characteristic of global imbalance lies in the fact that countries, especially the United States, possessing international payment tools such as the US dollar, can create unlimited international currency, allowing deficit countries to purchase goods and services from surplus countries without limits. This was not the case in the international monetary system before 1971. The key factor is that as the issuing country of the international reserve currency, the US has the ability to create an unlimited amount of US dollars and use them as an international payment tool, which sustains the modern international trade system and global imbalance phenomenon.
Q:What is the current situation of the trade deficit between China and the United States?
A:Although China's trade surplus with the United States has decreased from close to 100% in 2019 to around 20% currently, the United States remains China's most important external source of demand. The relationship between China and the United States has not loosened due to trade frictions; rather, it has become closer in some ways, just more indirectly linked through third-country re-exports.
Q:How does the United States create a surplus and obtain seigniorage globally through the dollar?
A:The United States creates a trade surplus globally by issuing dollars in exchange for goods, services, and reserve assets from other countries. This surplus essentially functions as a seigniorage tax collected by the United States from the global economy.
Q:Will the decline of the US dollar in the global cycle be challenged externally? What are the reasons for the decline of the US dollar in the global cycle?
A:The decline of the global dominance of the US dollar primarily comes from within the United States itself, rather than external challenges. Although the dollar remains the most important reserve currency and currency for foreign exchange market transactions globally, there are five possible challenges to the dollar's status, such as a return to the gold standard, Special Drawing Rights (SDR), a super-sovereign international currency, a basket of multiple sovereign currencies, or a digital currency based on blockchain technology. In the next ten years, the current international monetary system will continue, and the dominance of the US dollar will remain. The reasons for the decline of the global dominance of the US dollar lie within the United States itself, manifested as hollowing out of industries and widening income inequality. The globalization dividend brought by the US dollar exports is mainly concentrated in the hands of the wealthy and financial capitalists, while the income share of ordinary workers decreases and the profit share of businesses increases. This imbalance in the internal economic structure of the United States may lead to national decline.
Q:What are the strategies that the United States can adopt in response to the challenges of globalization?
A:The United States has three strategies to face the challenges of globalization. The first strategy is to adjust domestic policies, such as abandoning the dominance of the US dollar and promoting policies for shared prosperity. The second strategy is to take anti-globalization measures when unable to resolve internal issues, such as reducing imports from other countries and increasing domestic savings. The third strategy is to continue to decline on the path of anti-globalization, which requires restructuring its domestic economic structure.
Q:What should be the goal of the internationalization of the Renminbi in the current situation?
A:The goal of internationalizing the Renminbi should not be to replace the US dollar as the international reserve currency, as this would lead to hollowing out of domestic industries. It is more important to focus on maintaining existing trade stability, reducing reliance on foreign demand by expanding domestic demand, and paying attention to whether the United States' anti-globalization measures will cause domestic economic issues and how its external demand situation will impact China.
Q:What major achievements has the internationalization of the Renminbi achieved in the post-pandemic era?
A:The internationalization of the RMB has achieved significant achievements in the post-pandemic era, specifically reflected in historical highs in global payment currency rankings, global trade financing rankings, and other aspects. According to data from SWIFT, the ranking of the RMB in global payment currencies has improved, and from 2022 to 2024, there is a trend of increasing volume in cross-border RMB loans and offshore RMB loans in Hong Kong. In addition, the issuance of Panda bonds (onshore RMB-denominated bonds) and Dim Sum bonds (offshore RMB bonds in the Hong Kong market) has also shown positive progress.
Q:What are the main external environmental changes currently affecting the internationalization of the Chinese Yuan?
A:The current external environment changes that are affecting the internationalization of the Renminbi mainly come from the United States, including the impact of Trump's new policies on the dominance of the US dollar, as well as the capital outflows and market panic triggered by the "Three Kills" incident on April 2. After experiencing a series of fluctuations, the US dollar exchange rate has gradually stabilized, reflecting overseas investors' risk hedging behavior towards US dollar assets, especially in a high-interest rate environment, investors tend to use low-interest rate currencies for financing, thus promoting the internationalization of the Renminbi.
Q:What is the impact of the development of digital currency on the internationalization of the Renminbi?
A:The development of digital currencies may play a supportive role in the internationalization of the Renminbi. For example, the United States is actively promoting the development of stablecoins, while the European Central Bank, although initially planning to introduce a central bank digital currency, has encountered roadblocks with the rise of stablecoins in the United States. China has already decided to pursue a central bank digital currency and has shown strong competitiveness in the private sector digital payment system. This will help promote the internationalization of the Renminbi, especially when combined with the central bank digital currency of the public sector and the advanced digital payment systems of the private sector.
Q:How could the future trend of the US dollar exchange rate affect the internationalization of the Chinese Yuan?
A:The future trend of the US dollar exchange rate will be driven by two factors: on the one hand, the United States increasing tariffs can reduce the current account deficit, reduce the global supply of dollars, causing overseas investors to pay higher costs to obtain dollars, which will have a certain promoting effect on the internationalization of the Renminbi; on the other hand, the uncertainty brought by the Trump administration may reappear, which will have a negative impact on the internationalization of the Renminbi. Therefore, in the short term, the Renminbi exchange rate may be affected by event-driven fluctuations, but in the long term, the US dollar is showing a weakening trend overall, which is conducive to the internationalization of the Renminbi.
Q:Did Argentina use the Renminbi to maintain its current account payments? How is the global promotion of CIPS going?
A:Yes, in 2023 Argentina used the renminbi to maintain its current account payments. Our CIPS, as a renminbi payment system, is being promoted globally, with overseas clearing banks continuously improving their practices, without the need to participate in the BIS international clearing bank's currency bridge project. For example, we have successfully graduated and gained valuable experience in Hong Kong.
Q:What are the factors that promote the internationalization of the Renminbi?
A:Factors driving the internationalization of the renminbi include the Russia-Ukraine war, which has led Russia to settle trade with several countries using the renminbi; changing perceptions of Chinese assets overseas, with the Chinese stock market seen as a hedge against the US AI bubble; and geopolitical changes that have prompted the market to realize that having a significant market share (possibly 10% to 15%) for the renminbi can provide enough strength to avoid being bullied, promoting the use of the renminbi for international trade and investment settlement.
Q:How should we view the dominant position of the United States in the internationalization of the Renminbi?
A:The United States will not easily give up its dominant position, but when China achieves internationalization of the renminbi, we should take a practical attitude. It is not advisable to completely replace the dollar as the dominant currency, but to seek to occupy a sufficient share in the global market, so that other countries are willing to accept and use the renminbi for settlement.
Q:What challenges does the internationalization of the renminbi face?
A:The challenges we face include being the best we can be and becoming a strong financial and economic power; at the same time, we must address external challenges such as the impact of geopolitical changes and decide whether to promote retail central bank digital currency or rely on private sector payment platforms like Alipay and WeChat Pay to enter overseas markets when facing challenges from digital currency stablecoins.
Q:What are the predictions for the future exchange rate of the US dollar against the Chinese Renminbi?
A:Based on the views of the previous few guests, although it is generally believed that the US dollar is weakening, the actual trends vary. As for the forecasts of the US dollar against the Chinese Renminbi in 2026 and 2027, the discussion is still ongoing and no specific numbers have been provided. However, most people believe that due to the US fiscal issues, high debt levels, and the impact of economic management, the US dollar exchange rate is under depreciation pressure, but at the same time it is also influenced by the relative exchange rates of other currencies such as the Euro. The Renminbi may have short-term appreciation potential, but in the long term, it still needs to return to fundamentals.
Q:The United States may lower interest rates several times, and what impact will this have on the Renminbi?
A:We believe that the United States may cut interest rates three times, as opposed to the widely expected 1 to 2 times. If the United States does indeed cut interest rates three times, it will provide significant support for the Renminbi, allowing it to reach around 6.8.
Q:Do you think that the dominant position of the US dollar will change, and what are the sources of related forecasts?
A:In a book I read, it mentioned that the percentage of the US dollar in global currency reserves may decrease from the current 58% to 30% to 40% within the next ten years, which is the boldest prediction yet. This book is "Our Dollar and Your Problem," published by Kenny Rog, Chief Economist of FMF, at the beginning of this year.
Q:Why is this prediction about the decline of the US dollar hegemony worth attention?
A:Because the author accurately predicted many major issues in the book, including the peak of the Chinese real estate market in 2020, he has a high credibility for the view that the peak of the US dollar hegemony has already been reached.
Q:When discussing the trend of the US dollar, what factors do people typically pay attention to? Do you think there are any important factors that are being overlooked?
A:Most discussions are based on GDP, policies, and interest rate differentials, but one important factor that may be overlooked is that the United States is still the largest destination for foreign investment in the world, despite China having a larger volume of outward investment, it lags far behind the United States and Europe in attracting foreign capital.
Q:What is your opinion on the potential agreement on exchange rate adjustments and reduction of investment restrictions that may be reached after the meeting between Chinese and American leaders in April?
A:I have a guess that both sides may reach such a consensus. The United States also hopes for the appreciation of the RMB. If China makes certain promises regarding exchange rate appreciation, it will help to reach a trade agreement.
Q:What do you think is the likelihood of China's economy experiencing reflation (simultaneous increase in wages and prices) in 2026?
A:According to the current economic situation in China and the rebound of CPI and PPI, the likelihood of sustained reflation in 2026 is not high. The Chinese economy is still in the stage of improving people's livelihood needs, so it is unlikely to take significant measures to appreciate the currency.
Q:What are the reasons for the decline in the U.S. dollar index?
A:The reasons for the drop in the US dollar index include a slowdown in the US economic growth, consecutive interest rate cuts by the Federal Reserve, the impact of the internationalization of the renminbi on the US dollar's payment share, and market doubts about its credit due to the high level of US government debt.
Q:What is your prediction for the future exchange rate of the Renminbi?
A:It is predicted that the Renminbi will appreciate by 2026, potentially rising further to 6.8 or even lower after breaking 7, with the central forecast around 6.8. In the long run, as the global share of the US dollar declines, the Renminbi will have more opportunities for appreciation.
Q:What is the intuitive understanding behind this prediction?
A:Intuitively speaking, due to China's huge trade surplus, it is not possible to maintain a huge surplus indefinitely, and exchange rate adjustments will play a converging role. The model predicts that adjustments are necessary after the imbalance, and envisions an appreciation rate of 3% per year, which will return to a balanced state in ten years.
Q:Dr. Shan, can you briefly explain the principles of your exchange rate forecasting model?
A:Based on observations of the US dollar and systematic forecasts within the entire foreign exchange strategy system, we have included in the model the estimated devaluation of the dollar relative to other currencies. Currently, the model shows that the dollar is approximately 15% overvalued, while the Renminbi is approximately 25% undervalued. We predict a long-term trend in which the Renminbi will gradually appreciate to achieve economic balance.
Q:If the Renminbi appreciates by 3% each year, what impact will it have on exporters?
A:A 3% appreciation will indeed put some pressure on exporters, but as the example of Japan shows, with the development of high-quality products, exporters' sensitivity to exchange rate fluctuations will decrease, so a 3% appreciation over the course of a year is acceptable and manageable.
Q:What are the prospects for the future monetary system?
A:The dollar reserve system is currently dominant, but is facing a gradual decline, including factors such as the increase in the US fiscal deficit and debt levels. This may lead other economies to turn to other assets, such as RMB assets. However, the internationalization of the RMB needs to consider whether its yield can attract long-term allocations, and whether the fundamental of the Chinese economy can support this transition.
Q:What is your opinion on the internationalization process of the RMB?
A:In the past few years, the opening up of the Chinese financial market, especially the connectivity between the mainland and Hong Kong, has brought significant progress, which has helped to develop new economic momentum. Although there are some bright spots in the internationalization of the renminbi, solving many economic and livelihood problems is still needed to achieve a higher status. At the same time, it is also necessary to recognize that in the current environment, the role of the US dollar as a safe haven currency remains relatively stable, and the allocation of assets in emerging markets is more complex and diverse.
Q:In Sino-American relations, why is the United States temporarily unable to completely decouple from China in terms of industrial chains?
A:This is mainly because China's competitiveness in the industrial chain has greatly improved, the United States cannot afford a tariff hike of over 100%, and the impact of China's control over rare earths. Therefore, there is currently an anchor in the US-China relationship, even if the relationship is tense, the economic and trade ties between the two countries cannot be easily severed.
Q:Can we imagine some better directions, such as the opening of the Chinese market to the United States and the service industry?
A:What I focus more on is not only China's relationship with the United States, but also its emphasis on economic and trade relations with Europe. The United States is implementing unilateral tariff policies, while Europe has expressed opposition to China's overcapacity issue. China is now proposing to lead development through technology while also considering consumption. It is expected that the State Council will formulate detailed fifteen-year plans for this in the first half of this year, which will have a positive impact on Sino-US relations and China's geopolitical and trade relations with Europe.
Q:What are your prospects for the future international reserve currency system?
A:The future international reserve currency system will present a multipolar trend, with the US dollar, Euro, and Renminbi as the three main giants. Regarding the internationalization of the Renminbi, although the start is relatively stable, the pace can be appropriately accelerated. Establishing an offshore Renminbi trading center in a controllable manner can deepen the process of Renminbi internationalization and enhance financial security.
Q:How do you see the proportion of the Renminbi in international currency settlements in the next five or ten years?
A:Currently, the settlement ratio of the Renminbi is about 4%, and it is expected to gradually rise to over 10% in the future, surpassing the Japanese Yen and the British Pound. There is a high possibility that it will become one of the top three payment currencies.
Q:How do you view the argument that the Renminbi exchange rate is undervalued?
A:Professor Wu Xinru's research suggests that the actual exchange rate of the Renminbi is significantly undervalued, but I tend to believe that the Renminbi is not undervalued. The appreciation of the Renminbi is positive for the overall Chinese economy, but the appreciation should be gradual and promote the internationalization of the Renminbi to attract foreign investment, while avoiding significant fluctuations that may impact the competitiveness of export enterprises.

中国首席经济学家论坛
Follow





