2025中国首席经济学家年度盛会丨千帆过尽·万木春发——中国经济的涅槃重生
文章语言:
简
繁
EN
Share
Minutes
原文
会议摘要
The discussion focused on the current economic situation, policy environment, and investment strategies, pointing out major issues such as insufficient policy measures, a downturn in the real estate market, and external risks. At the same time, moderately loose monetary policy and a moderate optimistic adjustment to the external environment provide investment opportunities, especially in the bond market and certain commodities. Experts emphasized that there are investment opportunities through policy adjustments and expectations of economic recovery. In addition, the discussion also touched upon the development prospects of the Chinese economy in 2025, emphasizing the importance of new productivity for future economic growth, and the development direction of capital markets in the context of technological revolution. Experts recommended focusing on technology innovative companies and paying attention to opportunities brought about by policy adjustments and changes in the international situation. Overall, despite facing challenges, with the right policy choices and market adjustments, the economy and capital markets are expected to achieve stable growth.
会议速览

At the annual meeting of the China Chief Economist Forum, experts deeply discussed topics such as the construction of the Shanghai International Financial Center, the outlook for global financial and capital markets, the new policies of Trump, and the relationship between China and the United States. Special attention was paid to how fiscal policies can promote consumption and expand domestic demand, pointing out the foundation and pillar role of fiscal policy in national governance. Suggestions were made to optimize the structure of fiscal expenditures, increase subsidies to specific groups, stabilize the real estate and stock markets, etc., in order to enhance residents' consumption capacity and willingness, and thus promote the sustained and healthy development of the economy.

The focus of the discussion is on how to further improve the structure of national income distribution, increase the proportion of middle and low-income groups in national income, through reforming the tax system, increasing transfer payments, accelerating the marketization and circulation of rural land, etc. Especially by improving the tax system, promoting income distribution fairness through the reform of personal income tax, thus enhancing consumption. At the same time, optimizing the structure of fiscal expenditure, shifting from investment to a balance between investment and consumption, to achieve supply-demand balance. In addition, deepening the reform of the household registration system, raising the standards of rural pension insurance, are all measures aimed at promoting consumption and optimizing economic structure.

In the discussion, experts focused on how macroeconomic policies affect consumption, savings, and the real estate market, and also explored the role of policy regulation in stabilizing economic growth, promoting structural transformation, and preventing financial risks. They particularly emphasized the impact of housing prices on residents' consumption and savings decisions, pointing out the difference between real estate development and housing price bubbles. They also proposed adjustment strategies for fiscal and monetary policies, as well as the importance of structural reforms. Experts held different views on whether future policies should be tightened or adjusted, but generally agreed that current policies still need to be further optimized to promote healthy economic development.

The discussion focused on whether the current policy measures are sufficient to support economic growth, especially in regards to the economic outlook for the fourth quarter and next year. Participants believe that the basket of policies implemented since September 26 has made significant breakthroughs that were previously unseen, from fiscal policy to monetary policy, all demonstrating the government's determination to stabilize the economy. However, there is uncertainty regarding the long-term effectiveness and direction of these policies, especially considering the stability of the real estate market and changes in external demand. They also explored ways to stimulate the economy through fiscal stimulus, promote consumption, address local government debt, and utilize state-owned assets to boost consumption and economic growth. In addition, the discussion also touched on how to increase the proportion of consumption in GDP by adjusting income distribution structure, and how to overcome the bottleneck of income growth through internationalization.

The discussion focused on how to effectively encourage consumption, analyzing the consumption tendencies and changing consumption demands of different age groups. It particularly emphasized the preference of young people for cultural-related products and services, suggesting that policies should focus more on meeting these demands. In addition, the interaction between fiscal policy and monetary policy was also explored, as well as how these policies can better promote economic growth and consumption. Predictions were made on the future trends of interest rate cuts, reserve requirement ratio cuts, and the exchange rate of the Renminbi, emphasizing the importance of unblocking the transmission of monetary policy.

In the keynote speech session, the discussion focused on the importance of real estate for stable economic growth. It was pointed out that the stability of the real estate market not only directly affects economic growth, but also has a significant impact on overall economic recovery through driving related upstream and downstream industries and influencing consumer spending. In addition, it was emphasized that policies need to be more proactive to ensure the achievement of economic growth goals by 2025.

The focus of China's economic development outlook in 2025 is on expanding domestic demand, promoting consumption and investment, as well as stabilizing the real estate market. Policymakers need to focus on how to effectively implement fiscal and monetary policies to support economic growth. In addition, infrastructure investment is seen as one of the important drivers of economic growth and needs to be given priority attention and investment. There are downside risks in the real estate market, which need to be stabilized through policy support. Overall, the expected economic growth in 2025 is influenced by domestic and international conditions, and stability growth needs to be achieved through extraordinary adjustment measures and expectation management.

The conversation focused on the economic outlook and policy recommendations for 2025. On one hand, there is a moderate optimistic view towards the economy in 2025, despite the uncertainties in the external environment such as the potential impact of "Trump 2.0", it is believed that these risks can be hedged through the diversification of export structure and utilizing the resilience of globalization. It is expected that domestic demand will gradually improve, and the government is taking a series of measures to counter deflation, such as lowering interest rates and increasing consumer subsidies, aimed at stimulating consumption and economic recovery. The importance of the continuity and expansion of consumer subsidy policy, as well as the necessity of subsidizing the service industry to promote employment and income growth, are particularly emphasized. Furthermore, key issues such as adjustments in the real estate market, coordination of monetary policy and fiscal policy are also mentioned. Overall, the economic strategy for 2025 emphasizes stimulating domestic demand, policy flexibility, and measures to address external shocks.

The dialogue focused on issues related to income, employment, especially the employment of young people, while also discussing the effectiveness of childbirth subsidies and the challenges they pose to policy-making. It proposed increasing the openness of the service industry and improving the business environment as strategies to promote employment and income growth. In addition, it explored consumption stimulus measures, such as providing subsidies for home decoration, and boosting consumer confidence and household wealth effects through stabilizing the stock market and real estate market. Furthermore, the potential impact of long-term interest rates on the economy and the banking industry was discussed, emphasizing the interest rate game between macroeconomic policies and economic recovery.

At the 2025 Chinese Chief Economist Forum Annual Meeting, experts shared insights into the current economic situation and discussed strategies for asset allocation. Facing significant volatility in the stock market, a bull market in the bond market, record-high gold prices, and fluctuations in the RMB exchange rate, experts advised institutions and individuals to adopt a balanced strategy, focusing on high-dividend, low-volatility equity assets, while also keeping an eye on high-tech areas such as AI and new energy. In addition, experts emphasized the role of cognitive productivity in promoting high-quality economic development, and proposed how the capital market should respond to the development of new productive forces. The forum also discussed the potential of new fields such as low-altitude economy, and looked ahead to future trends in the economy and investments.

In the current economic situation, the deep integration of technological innovation and capital markets is the key to promoting high-quality economic development. By analyzing successful cases such as M7 Company, we recognize the importance of patient capital for the growth of technology companies, as well as the huge potential returns on technology investments. As the world's second-largest economy, China faces new challenges in technology competition and needs to achieve "me Better" on the basis of "me too" products, that is, surpassing existing standards through innovation and market adjustments. In addition, the widespread adoption of emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence and humanoid robots is expected to significantly increase total factor productivity, thereby driving fundamental changes in production relations. To achieve this goal, it is necessary to reform the capital market deeply, optimize existing stocks, and promote the development of new productivity. The government and the private sector need to increase support for scientists and hard technology, invest in long-term, hard technology projects through means such as technology finance, and promote the transformation and upgrading of economic structure, ultimately achieving high-quality economic development.

This meeting focuses on the new intelligent productivity and future industrial layout, emphasizing the importance of advanced technologies such as artificial intelligence in the future development of industries. The key discussions include industrial intelligence, industrial digitization, Chinese-style modernization, and the application of artificial intelligence in various industries. In addition, it also emphasizes the role of private economy in the development of new intelligent productivity, and puts forward policy suggestions to promote the development of private economy. Finally, through roundtable discussions, the meeting delved into the related topics of the layout of new intelligent productivity and capital, pointing out that humanoid robots, low-altitude economy, AI, etc. will become key tracks for the high-quality development of the Chinese economy.

In this conversation, the focus is on how new productivity can drive the transformation and upgrading of the manufacturing industry, especially in the context of Chinese manufacturing. Participants discussed the essence of new productivity, emphasizing the importance of innovation and technological revolution, and pointing out that new productivity not only represents advanced production methods, but also involves elements such as green, low-carbon, innovation, coordination, and sustainable development. In particular, as a representative of the traditional energy industry, Sinopec has shown how to explore and develop new energy forms and solutions such as shale gas, controlled nuclear fusion, and hydrogen energy through transformation and upgrading in the context of new productivity. In addition, the discussion also touched on emerging industries such as smart cars and humanoid robots, demonstrating the huge potential of the combination of new productivity and manufacturing industry. From the perspective of the capital market, new productivity provides new investment opportunities, especially in the field of high-end manufacturing. In conclusion, it is emphasized that with the continuous advancement of technology and the deep integration of manufacturing industry, there may be a more concentrated industrial structure in the future, where large companies may occupy a more important position due to their technology input and innovation capabilities.

In the discussion, experts focused on the core of China's new productivity being innovation, with industry as the carrier and enterprises as the main implementer. The discussion mainly revolved around three directions: the transformation or reengineering of traditional industries, the rapid development of emerging industries, and the exploration of future industries. There was a special emphasis on the huge potential in areas such as AI artificial intelligence, new energy vehicles, and smart driving. At the same time, the important role of capital in driving the development of new productivity was mentioned, as well as the future changes and investment opportunities in the Chinese capital market. Experts believe that the organic combination of technological innovation and the capital market is key to promoting sustained economic growth and enhancing competitiveness in China.

The discussion highlighted that the strategic competition and comprehensive confrontation between China and the United States are long-term and dynamic, and this relationship is likened to a balanced state of dynamic games. China and the United States as mutually influential decisive variables, need to consider the possible reactions of the other when formulating strategies. The discussion pointed out that China is waiting for the policy actions of the United States in order to formulate corresponding countermeasures. In addition, the analysis also involved the impact of internal political struggles in the United States on Sino-US relations and the global economy. Specifically, the discussion addressed the changes in foreign policy of the Trump administration, the challenges in domestic politics, and how these changes might affect international capital markets and currency values. The discussion also touched on the stability of the Renminbi exchange rate and its role as a policy tool, predicting that the Renminbi exchange rate will fluctuate within a certain range. Finally, it pointed out the importance of the interactions between China and the United States, as well as the adjustments in political and economic strategies in the current global economic situation for the future relationship between the two countries and the global market.

The discussion first emphasized the political significance of the policy of expanding domestic demand proposed at the Central Economic Work Conference in China and the market's reaction to it, believing that the market has not fully priced in policy changes in China, especially in terms of the demand for policy certainty in a bear market mentality. In addition, the analysis explored the role of population quality and technological innovation in driving China's modernization, as well as the inspiration of Musk's innovation on China's technological development. Furthermore, the discussion addressed the impact of the US-China relationship, tariff issues, and global technological competition on the Chinese economy and market, particularly the potential impact of advancements in artificial intelligence and the semiconductor cycle on the economy. Overall, it emphasized the importance of policy response, technological revolution, and economic cycle patterns, as well as considerations for investment strategies in the current economic and market environment.

The year 2025 is predicted to be a year full of economic and capital market changes, especially for China. The resurgence of the Shanghai Stock Exchange's price-to-earnings ratio, the continued drag of the Chinese real estate market, and the outlook for economic cyclical recovery together constitute a major test for investors. In-depth analysis is proposed on various aspects such as the Chinese economic cycle, policy shift, and the global gold market, emphasizing the importance of finding opportunities in economic fluctuations. The outlook also specifically mentions stocks, gold, and government bonds as important investment targets, as well as the possible impact of policies, markets, and international situations in 2025 on investments. In general, despite the various challenges that may arise in 2025, investors still have a great opportunity to achieve good investment returns through correct strategic choices.

In the roundtable discussion on the outlook for the capital market in 2025, experts generally have a cautiously optimistic view of the stock market, believing that despite short-term market fluctuations, there are still investment opportunities in the long run. The discussion focused on the elasticity and volatility of the A-share market, emphasizing the potential impact of policies, interest rate levels, and technological innovation on the stock market. Experts presented predictions for the asset returns in 2025, with a special focus on the stock market, including investment opportunities in high dividend-yield assets and the technology sector. In addition, views on the bond and commodity markets were also mentioned, with expectations of decreased absolute returns in bonds and potential differentiation opportunities in the commodity market. The discussion also covered the impact of policy support, declining market interest rates, and the emergence of technology and artificial intelligence on the capital market. Overall, experts believe that despite uncertainties, investors can still find investment opportunities in 2025 by paying attention to policy trends, interest rate changes, and technological innovation.

In the discussion, experts focused on the current status and future prospects of the stock and bond markets, especially regarding investment opportunities. They pointed out that opportunities in the stock market often arise after market declines, while the current bond market is showing strength due to liquidity release. The experts also emphasized the importance of choosing the right investment strategy for investors, including timely adjustment opportunities and selecting bond products that can provide stable returns. In addition, they mentioned the impact of interest rate changes on the market and the potential influence of government policies on the economy and market trends.
要点回答
Q:At yesterday's meeting, what topics were discussed in depth? What will be the main focus of today's meeting?
A:The meeting yesterday mainly focused on the construction of the Shanghai International Financial Center, the outlook for global finance and capital markets, Trump's new policies and their impact on US-China relations and trade. Today's meeting will focus on China's macroeconomy and capital markets.
Q:What is the first theme of the keynote speech, and who will be delivering this speech?
A:The first keynote speech will be on "How Fiscal Policies Promote Consumption and Expand Domestic Demand", and will be delivered by Mr. Luo Zhiheng, Chief Economist of Yuekai Securities.
Q:What role and functions does finance play in economic and social development? Why is finance considered to be the core and key issue of China's economic problems?
A:Finance is not only the foundation and important pillar of national governance, but also an important guarantee for optimizing resource allocation, maintaining market unity, promoting social equity, and achieving long-term stability of the country. It has risen from the level of tools to the level of national governance, and plays a crucial role in economic growth, smoothing economic fluctuations, and preventing and resolving economic risks. Finance has inherent functions in promoting economic growth, regulating economic cycles, preventing and resolving various risks (such as real estate risks and financial risks), and promoting reform, development, and stability. Therefore, it is the core and key to understanding China's economic issues.
Q:How to understand the relationship between consumption and investment and the importance of their proportions? How can fiscal policy boost consumption through its functions?
A:We need to avoid the binary opposition between consumption and investment. The key lies in the proportion between the two and whether investment can meet demand in the short term and optimize the supply structure in the medium to long term. Only by clarifying this point can we effectively promote consumption and expand domestic demand. The fiscal policy can directly stimulate consumption and expand investment through measures such as reducing taxes and fees, and increasing expenditure. At the same time, fiscal policy, as a link between the government and the market, the central and local governments, plays an important role in promoting economic growth, smoothing economic fluctuations, and preventing and resolving economic risks, thereby indirectly boosting consumption.
Q:Do the popular beliefs about consumption in society currently conform to economic laws?
A:Some popular beliefs in society, such as the idea that current emphasis should be excessively placed on consumption at the expense of investment, or the notion that consumption is merely a means to stimulate economic growth rather than an end in itself, need to be further analyzed and approached rationally, in order to ensure a correct understanding and grasp of consumption.
Q:In the Central Economic Work Conference, how is the upgrading of consumption discussed in three aspects: improving residents' consumption capacity and willingness, optimizing the structure of fiscal expenditure, and enhancing the adaptability of supply?
A:At the Central Economic Work Conference, the first thing mentioned was to improve residents' consumption capacity, which means moderately increasing residents' income to enhance consumption willingness. In terms of finance, it emphasized the further optimization of fiscal expenditure structure, aiming to shift fiscal expenditure from being focused on goods to being focused on people, with equal emphasis on investment and consumption. This includes the trend of increasing the proportion of expenditure on medical care, education, elderly care, and housing security, despite optimization efforts already in place. Additionally, leading industrial innovation through technological innovation, developing new productive forces to improve the adaptability of supply to consumer demand was emphasized. Furthermore, specific measures were proposed, such as increasing subsidies and support for specific groups, stabilizing the stock market and real estate market to enhance residents' property income and wealth effects, and implementing short-term measures such as the policy of exchanging old products for new ones.
Q:What is your opinion on the current optimization of the structure of fiscal expenditures?
A:The current structure of fiscal expenditure is continuously being optimized, with the proportion of social security employment, education, healthcare, and other people's livelihood expenditures increasing, while the proportion of infrastructure investment-related expenditures decreasing. In the future, further optimization and adjustment will still be needed to address residents' concerns and increase marginal consumption tendencies.
Q:What is your opinion on long-term policy for increasing consumption?
A:Long-term policies mainly include improving the distribution structure of national income, increasing the proportion of the middle and low-income groups in national income through measures such as improving the tax system, increasing transfer payments, and accelerating the market-oriented circulation of rural land. Specific measures could include gradually transitioning from the current system of classified taxation to a system of comprehensive and classified individual income tax collection, while optimizing the design of special additional deductions to more fairly reflect family burdens. In addition, strengthen supervision of high-income groups such as entertainment celebrities and live-streaming salespersons, and deepen reform of the household registration system, particularly clarifying the responsibility for the provision of basic public services and expenditure for the floating population, in order to better support consumption growth.
Q:How do you view the relationship between investment and consumption?
A:Investment and consumption are not mutually exclusive, but rather an organic cycle and a part of the whole. Fiscal policy should shift from a past emphasis on investment to a focus on equal emphasis on investment and consumption, in order to achieve a higher level of supply-demand balance, and to increase support for consumption.
Q:In the current context of overall low consumption, are there any structural factors at play? Based on the understanding of the reasons for weak consumption, how should macroeconomic policies to boost consumption be considered?
A:Yes, from the perspective of boosting consumption, the current low proportion of consumption in total demand is a typical fact. The proportion of household consumption to GDP is 37%, and if the rental income from owning a house is not included in consumption at market prices, it may underestimate the proportion of household consumption by 5 to 10 percentage points. Even with such adjustments, China's household consumption is still low, especially when compared internationally. After understanding the structural reasons for weak consumption and cyclical factors, short-term policies to boost consumption should increase the intensity of countercyclical macroeconomic regulation to respond to cyclical shocks. In the long term, attention should be paid to and gradually solve the structural issues of household income structure, consumption tendencies, and social security mentioned above.
Q:What structural macroeconomic issues are reflected by the low proportion of resident consumption? What are the reasons for the low proportion of resident income?
A:The low proportion of resident consumption mainly reflects two structural problems: first, the proportion of resident income in GDP distribution is low; second, the tendency of residents to consume is low, that is, the proportion of consumption expenditure to disposable income is also low. The reason for the low proportion of resident income is that the proportion of income in the enterprise sector is high. In GDP distribution, the enterprise sector has a large proportion, and there are a lot of depreciation expenses, which are used to maintain fixed assets, forming a phenomenon where a large part of income circulates within the enterprise, leading to relatively low resident income.
Q:What are the reasons for residents' tendency to have low consumption and high savings?
A:The main reason for the low consumption tendency and high savings tendency of residents is mainly related to China's tax system structure. High-income families have a lower savings tendency, while low-income families have a higher consumption rate. However, in China, due to a higher proportion of indirect taxes and their regressive nature, it is not conducive to the overall increase in residents' consumption rate. In addition, the social security system still needs to be improved, especially the low coverage and benefit standards of social security in rural areas, which affects residents' consumption capacity.
Q:What impact does housing prices have on residents' consumption?
A:The development of housing prices has a complex impact on resident consumption. On one hand, the real estate industry has a certain stimulating effect on consumption; on the other hand, rising housing prices lead to residents saving up to buy houses, especially in the case of a housing bubble, where precautionary savings motives are enhanced, thereby inhibiting consumption expenditure.
Q:What are the cyclical reasons for the current weak consumption?
A:Current weak consumption is not only affected by structural factors, but also shows obvious cyclical characteristics, such as deviations in household income and employment from long-term trends, weakening expectations for future economic growth, and significant changes in consumption behavior of businesses and government departments.
Q:In countercyclical regulation, how do you think the structure of fiscal expenditures should be adjusted to increase household consumption rates?
A:In countercyclical regulation, I support adjusting the structure of fiscal expenditure to increase household consumption rate. Specific measures include reducing investment expenditures, increasing consumption expenditures and transfer payments, especially towards key populations. At the same time, attention should be paid to the impact of housing prices on the household consumption rate, avoiding using stimulating housing prices as a government regulatory target, but instead stabilizing the real estate market and moderately promoting sales.
Q:How do you view the role of real estate in counter-cyclical regulation?
A:Real estate as a counter-cyclical control target is controversial. In the long run, the housing bubble may indeed suppress household consumption, especially in the medium to long term. Therefore, in the short term, although the deep adjustment of the real estate market brings significant pressure, control policies should avoid directly relying on housing price expectations, and instead seek other ways to stabilize the real estate market.
Q:What specific suggestions have you proposed in terms of structural reform?
A:From a medium to long-term perspective, structural reform should aim to boost consumption, with a focus on improving income distribution. This includes reforms in fiscal and tax policies, such as reducing the proportion of indirect taxes and increasing the proportion of direct taxes, especially personal income taxes; financial market reforms to help families better benefit from investments in the corporate sector; and consideration of establishing and improving personal bankruptcy systems to provide restructuring and rejuvenation opportunities for households facing debt difficulties.
Q:What is the role of social security in boosting consumption and responding to cyclical fluctuations?
A:The social security system combines both cyclical and structural policies, which is beneficial for improving income distribution, increasing fiscal redistribution, and boosting household consumption. In addition, the social security system serves as an economic automatic stabilizer, covering more unemployed individuals, especially young people, during economic downturns, thereby expanding the ability for countercyclical operations. Therefore, it is an important policy direction.
Q:Do you think that the current macroeconomic policy needs to be intensified in the next step, or should the existing policy be maintained?
A:According to current macroeconomic judgments, some chief economists believe that current policies are not enough and further efforts are needed to enhance the ability of fiscal policy to create tangible job opportunities in the real economy, in order to ensure that the improvement in market sentiment can be directly linked to policy effects and sustain the positive momentum of the economy. At the same time, it is emphasized that continuous reinforcement of fiscal policy, along with coordination with monetary policy and financial market reforms, is crucial. Additionally, attention should also be paid to the sustainability of government fiscal capacity.
Q:After the Central Economic Work Conference, how is the market looking to stabilize the real estate and stock markets and anticipating new policies? What are people's views on whether the policy measures are sufficient to stabilize the economy in the fourth quarter and achieve a good start next year?
A:After the Central Economic Work Conference, the market expects the real estate and stock markets to stabilize, and there is a policy vacuum during the two sessions, with everyone waiting for new policies to be introduced. It is expected that the policies and measures of the Central Economic Work Conference will be further implemented during the two sessions, and the Political Bureau meeting at the end of April may introduce policies for the next phase of efforts. Policies in the third quarter may be adjusted according to the actual situation to stimulate the economy. From the series of policies implemented after September 26, it is sufficient to stabilize the economy in the fourth quarter and give a good start to the first quarter of next year. These policies break through the past, with the broad fiscal deficit ratio expected to reach over 10% of GDP, and the narrow fiscal deficit ratio being around 4%. With the active operation of local governments, it is expected that the annual work goals will be achieved.
Q:From a long-term perspective, is the policy intensity sufficient for the entire year next year?
A:It is still difficult to determine whether the policy efforts for the entire year next year will be sufficient. The key lies in whether the real estate market can stabilize and whether external demand will be affected after Trump takes office. These two questions still have no clear answers, so the policy also cannot be fully determined.
Q:Since the policy direction has been determined, how great is the specific implementation strength, and how can the effect be ensured to be apparent?
A:The policy direction is positive, with fiscal policy becoming more active and monetary policy moderately loose, including measures such as increasing the deficit rate and timely reduction of reserve requirements and interest rates. Although the direction has been determined, there is a wait-and-see sentiment in the market. If the policy implementation is not appropriate, it may lead to weakened effects. There is a lot of policy space, which should be actively utilized to enhance market confidence and expectations.
Q:How to evaluate the effects and scale of the collection and storage policy for the stability of the real estate market?
A:The storage policy will help stabilize housing prices and prevent further deterioration, but a more effective choice may be to provide universal assistance to developers by purchasing partial shares to restore confidence in the financial markets and drive the recovery of the real estate industry.
Q:In terms of boosting consumption, how can we start by improving the proportion of consumption in GDP through income distribution structure?
A:The key to increasing consumption lies in optimizing the income distribution structure among the government, enterprises, and residents. It is suggested to redirect the returns from state-owned assets more towards the household sector, such as transferring some state-owned assets to social security funds, benefiting low-income groups and effectively increasing the level of consumption.
Q:Regarding setting the fiscal deficit rate at 4%, what is the corresponding GDP level? And how can the issue of local government debt be addressed?
A:A deficit rate of 4% is more of a signal indicating that policies will be more proactive, but the actual fiscal space is greater than 4%. Local government debt is significant, but the financing problem for future infrastructure investment has not been completely resolved. It needs to be solved reasonably by increasing the scale of special bonds or other means.
Q:When discussing the strength of policies, what is the core goal that everyone is focused on?
A:The core goal that everyone is focused on is whether we can return to the state of rapid growth in the past.
Q:Why is it difficult for the economies in the industrialization process to maintain the growth rate of the earlier stages?
A:This is because with the advancement of industrialization and urbanization processes, the existing demand supports (such as residents' consumption demand, urbanization demand, industrialization demand, and internationalization demand) gradually saturate after the economy reaches a certain level, and can no longer provide sustained high-speed growth momentum.
Q:What are the challenges facing the current Chinese economy?
A:China faces historical legacy issues in the process of industrialization and urbanization development, such as local government debt and real estate debt, which need to be properly addressed to avoid becoming long-term burdens. At the same time, it is also necessary to solve the problem of increasing the matching between residents' consumption and income, including through clear wealth transfer or transfer payment methods and the development of the service industry to promote wealth flow. Additionally, global trade barriers need to be addressed in the context of globalization, to enhance the bargaining power of tradable sectors in the global market and drive consumption growth.
Q:How should policies encourage consumption and determine the size of stimulus in response to the current consumer situation?
A:Policies should encourage consumption related to Chinese culture and brands, and focus on the changing needs of young consumers. Considering the impact of external uncertainties on economic growth, the scale of fiscal stimulus may need to reach around 1 trillion to 1.5 trillion to offset a GDP gap of about one point. In addition, to stimulate consumption in diverse consumption scenarios and levels, measures such as providing consumption subsidies can be taken, especially targeting low- and middle-income groups.
Q:What impact does the stabilization of real estate prices have on consumption and investment?
A:The stabilisation of real estate prices not only concerns the improvement of housing demand, but also represents an important wealth item for the middle class. Once house prices stabilise and rise, it will help to increase the consumption willingness and ability of the middle class, while also having an important impact on the consumption and investment decisions of high-income groups. In addition, as a financial product, the price changes of real estate will also affect the stability of the entire financial market.
Q:In real estate policies, how should we respect its market economy status and ensure that financial attributes are reasonably reflected?
A:We should recognize that real estate has a dual nature as a pillar industry of the national economy and a financial product, allowing for a certain degree of speculation and bubbles in the financial sector. As long as the public can feel that real estate is a good way to preserve and appreciate value in the future, the policy effects can be better translated.
Q:How do you view the current discussion on whether the economic scale is sufficient enough to stimulate consumption?
A:When discussing whether the economic scale is sufficient, we need to pay attention to the difference between expectations and reality. Currently, the market generally expects the scale to be at least around 10 trillion next year, and there has been some improvement in economic indicators from the third quarter to the fourth quarter. Market performance, especially the performance of the stock market, is of important reference value for judging whether policy measures are sufficient.
Q:Which direction is more suitable when discussing the policy of increasing?
A:When implementing stimulus policies, areas with higher efficiency may be in stabilizing the housing market and boosting the stock market, especially as boosting the stock market can more obviously stimulate consumption tendencies and wealth effects. However, compared to stabilizing the housing market, I am more inclined towards boosting the stock market as a policy direction.
Q:How should we view the tools of macroeconomic policy regulation?
A:Traditionally, we tend to adjust the macroeconomy by stimulating domestic demand through external demand and investment. However, in reality, many demand issues are caused by insufficient supply. For example, consumer demand is closely related to the quality of supply, and consumption can also be driven by providing high-quality supply.
Q:What are the expectations of the chief executives for next year's monetary policy outlook?
A:The monetary policy next year will remain moderately loose, with the possibility of larger interest rate cuts and reserve requirement ratio reductions than last year. At the same time, attention needs to be paid to changes in credit risk premiums and the trend of the RMB exchange rate. In the long term, with the improvement of China's production efficiency, there is a demand for RMB appreciation, but in the short term, there may still be pressure for depreciation. The effectiveness of the transmission mechanism of monetary policy will be the key factor determining the space for future interest rate cuts and reserve requirement ratio reductions.
Q:In 2024, China's trade surplus approaches nearly one trillion US dollars, but why is the Renminbi still facing depreciation pressures?
A:The main reason is the outflow of capital under the capital account, despite the continuous inflow under the trade account. The reasons for the outflow under the capital account include confidence factors and the fact that the people are more willing to increase asset prices due to lower domestic investment returns, leading to a capital outflow.
Q:What are the different opinions in the market regarding the intensity and pace of macroeconomic policies in 2025?
A:There are differing opinions in the market regarding macroeconomic control policies for 2025. Some people advocate a wait-and-see approach, while others hope for more direct and immediate policies to reverse market expectations and boost confidence.
Q:Where is the importance of real estate in stabilizing growth reflected?
A:The stabilization of the real estate market is the key to maintaining stable economic growth in China, especially in the short term. According to data, after the implementation of a package of growth policies, the economy and the market have shown signs of recovery, including the real estate market. If the real estate market does not stabilize and stop falling, domestic demand, especially consumer demand, will be difficult to stabilize, and the pressure to maintain growth will increase.
Q:To what extent does real estate impact the economy in our country?
A:The direct impact of real estate on GDP is approximately 10%, including the narrow real estate industry and the construction industry. The indirect impact is more difficult to estimate, involving the upstream and downstream industries in the chain, and could reach around 10% to 20%, plus the wealth effect, the overall impact on the economy could be around 25%.
Q:How much impact did the decline in the real estate market last year have on economic growth?
A:According to conservative estimates, the overall real estate market declined by 8% last year. This means that the GDP decreased by approximately 2 percentage points due to the decline in the real estate market, that is, the impact of the real estate market on GDP decreased by 2%.
Q:How much did real estate drag down overall GDP growth last year?
A:According to statistical calculations, real estate investment decreased by about 10% last year, accounting for around 25% of fixed asset investment. This caused the overall growth rate of fixed asset investment to decrease from 7.4% to 3.3%, which was a significant drag on the economy.
Q:How is the situation in terms of consumption?
A:In the total retail sales of consumer goods, the amount spent on goods increased by only 3.0%, while revenue from dining increased by 5.7%, indicating that service consumption, especially dining consumption, showed strong growth. However, goods consumption, particularly in categories related to real estate such as construction and decoration materials, furniture, and household appliances, showed negative growth.
Q:Can data from the supply side also reflect the impact of real estate on the economy?
A:According to the supply-side data, the value added of manufacturing and electricity, heat, gas, and water production and industry, which are not heavily associated with real estate, increased by 5.9% and 5.8% respectively. These data further prove the drag effect of real estate on overall economic growth.
Q:What will be the policy direction for the stable growth strategy in 2025?
A:It is expected that by 2025, the country will take a more proactive policy stance, including both monetary and fiscal policies being more loose and forceful. On the fiscal side, the deficit is expected to reach a high level to support the expansion of domestic demand and promote consumption and investment.
Q:Among the various policy tools, which one can most effectively stabilize the Chinese economy?
A:In stabilizing the Chinese economy, investment (especially in real estate and infrastructure), consumption, and exports (trade) will play a key role. Among these, the rebound in the real estate market is considered crucial for maintaining growth, while the recovery in consumption and a cautiously optimistic view on export performance also contribute to future economic growth.
Q:What do you think the consumer situation will be like in 2025?
A:I believe that the consumer situation in 2025 will be relatively stable. At least from the current data, the effects of the policy of replacing old with new are good. Therefore, it is expected that consumer spending in 2025 will expand from automobiles and household appliances to household goods, home textiles, home decor, and consumer electronics such as mobile phones. There should be no problem with consumption.
Q:One of the core topics is whether the real estate industry can stabilize. Can you please share your views on the real estate market?
A:The key to stabilizing the real estate market lies in whether it can stop declining and stabilize. From the data, in the past few years, the sales area of real estate has shown a downward trend, and the growth rate of M1 is highly synchronous with real estate sales, indicating that currently there is no other industry that can effectively replace real estate as the new growth point for the entire society. There is a great uncertainty about whether the real estate market can stabilize in 2025. Some analysts believe that it is possible to rebound, but most macro chief economists and bond chief economists hold a cautious attitude. If the decline in real estate sales in 2025 can be within 800 million, it will be a significant stabilization, but it is currently unclear whether this goal can be achieved.
Q:What are your views on the current inventory problem in the real estate market and the effectiveness of policies?
A:Currently, there is a portion of housing inventory in China that has been built but not yet sold, with the majority concentrated in third-tier and lower cities. Despite the government implementing a series of real estate related policies, the effect on stabilizing sales and prices in cities beyond the third tier is relatively limited. If there is no further policy support for sales and price stabilization in these cities in the coming years, the overall real estate market may continue to decline.
Q:When discussing the key factors for stable economic growth in 2025, what role do you think real estate and infrastructure will play?
A:Real estate and infrastructure play important roles in stable growth in 2025. Despite some cautious views, it is expected that there will be significant changes in infrastructure in 2025, with the growth rate expected to stabilize and rise, as in recent years there has been a deviation between infrastructure growth and physical quantity trends, and the implementation of optimization plans for special bonds may lead to improvements in infrastructure investment. At the same time, there is also a possibility of stabilization in the real estate sector, but it depends crucially on factors such as the pace of bond issuance and the intensity of credit expansion in the coming months.
Q:What are your views on the trend of the bond market, as well as the views reflected in the trading behind the future economic recovery and new growth path?
A:The rapid downward trend in the bond market indicates that the market has great confidence in whether the Chinese economy can stabilize in 2025, especially with the expectations of loose monetary policy and active fiscal policy. However, in addition to monetary and fiscal factors, attention should also be paid to whether real estate, infrastructure, prices, consumption, and policy measures can be effectively implemented. Currently, the policy emphasizes "doing work diligently." It is expected that proactive policies will be adopted in 2025 to promote economic recovery.
Q:In the current economic environment, what is the primary task for executing management? After the subprime mortgage crisis, what impact do the fiscal stimulus measures in countries such as the US, UK, and Europe have on economic recovery?
A:The primary task is to implement management effectively, and unconventional measures should be taken in fiscal stimulus, such as expanding the deficit from 3% to over 4%, and even further increasing efforts to achieve better stimulus effects. After the subprime crisis, the United States, the United Kingdom, and Europe implemented substantial fiscal stimulus measures, effectively promoting economic recovery, with the United States showing particularly significant recovery effects. In contrast, China's rapid and vigorous stimulus measures in 2008 also helped stabilize the Chinese economy quickly.
Q:What are the expectations and recommendations for next year's economy?
A:Next year, if extraordinary measures are taken, it is expected that there will be three interest rate cuts, with a magnitude between 100 and 150 basis points. In terms of monetary pricing, in addition to interest rate cuts, support for the real estate and stock markets should also be increased structurally, especially by accelerating the implementation pace of policies such as currency swaps, considering increasing the special bond quota to 5 trillion yuan, and flexibly using it to support project construction, repayment of hidden debts, and debts owed by local state-owned enterprises. In addition, it is expected that there will be a slight improvement in external demand, while domestic demand will gradually improve, presenting an overall mild optimistic trend.
Q:What is the strategy for the globalization trend and hedging external impacts?
A:Globalization is resilient. Despite facing challenges of decentralization, the level of globalization is showing a trend of improvement. With a diversified export structure and reduced reliance on a single market, as well as a commitment to open policies, globalization will provide a certain degree of cushioning against the potential impact of Trump 2.0.
Q:How to understand the issue of overcapacity in the current economic situation, and where does the confidence in future economic improvement come from?
A:Currently, we are in a stage of imbalance between supply and demand and serious overproduction, but the government has recognized this and taken a series of measures to resist deflation. With the gradual manifestation of policy effects, it is expected that the economy will improve by 2025. The nominal growth rate is of concern, and policies such as stabilizing the real estate market and further interest rate cuts will help the economy to turn around.
Q:From the People's Bank meeting to the Political Bureau meeting and then to the Economic Work Conference, what is the attitude of the party and the state towards issues such as the economy, the capital market, consumption, external demand and domestic demand?
A:The party and the state have shown a high degree of importance to economic issues at the above-mentioned meeting, indicating a trend of incrementally increasing measures. Despite facing potential risks that may arise in the next 25 years, especially with increasing external risks, there is a clear demand for stabilizing the real estate market, and continuous efforts are being made at the policy level, including but not limited to the use of special bonds, loan collection and storage, and the collection of existing housing on idle land to improve the supply and demand relationship in the real estate market.
Q:What are the specific measures and prospects for the regulation policies on the real estate market? How is the situation in terms of infrastructure, consumption, and fiscal resources?
A:On the policy side, efforts are being made to achieve stability in housing prices by reasonably adjusting the supply-demand relationship. For example, during three consecutive years of decline in the real estate market, both new construction and sales have shown improvement. If there is not a significant external impact by 2025, a mild internal policy will be implemented; however, in the face of strong external impacts, there will be an increase in incremental fund collection methods and the proportion of monetization in shantytown renovation, in order to reflect the space for loosening internal policy constraints. In terms of infrastructure development, the largest debt payment measures in history have been introduced, and their effect depends on the financial data at the beginning of the year; on the consumption end, efforts are being made to seek support from both the supply and demand side, such as targeted subsidies for low-income groups, civil servants, etc., as well as the possibility of providing further boost to consumption, real estate, and investment by increasing the deficit ratio, government bond space, etc.
Q:Discussion and suggestions on boosting consumption?
A:The Central Economic Work Conference will prioritize boosting consumption as the top task, but currently the recovery of consumption is facing pressure and effective measures need to be taken. In addition to continuing the policy of trading in old for new, it is also necessary to consider increasing subsidies for special groups, and allocating more fiscal resources towards consumption, especially by expanding the scope of consumption subsidies, such as including more products in the subsidy list, and focusing on increasing the subsidy ratio for service consumption, in order to promote sustained consumption growth.
Q:What suggestions do you have for increasing the income and employment of young people?
A:When it comes to increasing the income and employment opportunities for young people, more attention should be paid to the openness and innovation in the service industry, as this sector has a greater impact on employment and income. In addition, for policies such as childbirth subsidies, more effective incentive mechanisms should be explored, such as subsidies for first-time marriages and first-time births, to avoid potential consumption reduction issues caused by the decreased marriage and parenthood aspirations of young people.
Q:Can the rise in asset prices effectively boost consumption, leading to the so-called wealth effect?
A:The wealth effect does have a positive effect on boosting consumption, but this effect will not be rapidly manifested in the short term, but rather a process of relatively stable and upward expectations. Therefore, stabilizing the property market and stock market are crucial for enhancing the wealth effect of the household sector. If the real estate market spreads from first-tier cities to second-tier and even third-tier cities, stabilizing the expectations of residents' wealth may even have a stronger promoting effect on consumption in the short term than income growth.
Q:Regarding how to understand the differences between stabilizing the real estate market and the stock market as proposed by the central government, and how to effectively stabilize the stock market under the current circumstances, in addition to the existing structural monetary policy tools, what other tools can be used?
A:Stabilizing the real estate and stock markets aims to avoid large fluctuations, promote a steady improvement in the market, harness the wealth effect, boost consumption and confidence. Currently, in addition to the existing tools of the central bank, more policy tools are being studied and prepared. For example, the establishment and improvement of the stabilization fund, as well as the promotion of the financial stability law, aim to build a more long-term stable financial system. At the same time, it is necessary to introduce long-term funds into the market, streamline the funding supply chain, and strengthen public opinion control to ensure market stability. However, the implementation and effectiveness of these measures will take time and require the joint efforts of various regulatory authorities, senior officials, and market participants.
Q:Can the real estate market stabilize in the future, and what are the main difficulties?
A:In the short term, the stability of the real estate market faces significant challenges. The main difficulties include: 1) Implementing similar purchase restrictions policies as Guangzhou and Shenzhen in first-tier cities such as Beijing and Shanghai; 2) Reducing the down payment ratio to ease the burden on home buyers, which can significantly stimulate demand more than lowering interest rates or reserve requirements; 3) Implementing policies to encourage housing upgrades, such as trading in old homes for new ones.
Q:In the current external environment, is it difficult for the Federal Reserve to cut interest rates, and what impact does this have on our real estate market?
A:Indeed, the market's perception of the Federal Reserve has fundamentally changed now. It has become very difficult to lower interest rates. Long-term rates may fall to 4.5%, with some even predicting they could reach 5%. This external environment does have an impact on us, but we still have significant room for policy measures.
Q:If the down payment can be increased and incentives can be provided to improve demand, combined with the clarification of the external environment, is it possible for the real estate market to achieve stability?
A:If policies such as down payment assistance and improving demand are implemented, and the external environment becomes clearer, it is possible to achieve stability in the real estate market.
Q:The 10-year government bond yield has fallen below 1.6%. Can the long-term bond yield stabilize in the future? What impact will the low interest rate levels have on banks and the economy?
A:The trend of the 10-year treasury bond yield depends on the game between the degree of macroeconomic policy relaxation and the improvement of supply-demand imbalance in the economy. If the macroeconomic recovery exceeds expectations and achieves supply-demand rebalancing, interest rates may stabilize and continue to fall; conversely, if the economy does not improve, interest rates may rise.
Q:Under intense fluctuations in asset prices, how should institutions and residents allocate their assets? What recommendations do you have for allocating assets such as currencies and gold?
A:Institutions may consider adopting a dumbbell strategy, allocating to high-dividend, low-volatility equity assets and resilient high-tech sectors such as AI-related industries; ordinary people can purchase related index funds to diversify stock risks. Long-term bullish on gold, but there may be some fluctuations in the short term; in terms of foreign exchange, the bull market space for the renminbi is relatively small, but the returns are relatively certain. Overall, it is recommended to allocate in the stock and bond markets, while paying attention to investment opportunities in the stock market under policy support.
Q:How to evaluate the performance of the stock market in 2025 and provide asset allocation recommendations?
A:Have an optimistic attitude towards the stock market in 2025, there will be volatility. It is recommended to allocate a portion to high-dividend, low-volatility equity assets, and at the same time layout in the high-tech field, such as AI, benefiting from policy initiatives and domestic substitution logic.
Q:What can the government do in the new infrastructure construction? What role does the financial sector play in the new infrastructure construction?
A:The government can leverage its advantage in infrastructure construction to invest in key technologies for the new generation of infrastructure, such as sensors, energy storage, efficient operation networks, and computing power. At the same time, through the PPP model, it can cooperate with private companies to promote project design and construction, and provide specific categories of financial support, such as interest rate support related to new infrastructure construction. The financial industry can support innovation by providing a series of financial tools such as VC/PE, technology loans, and rates, helping to establish the ecosystem of new infrastructure construction. The goal of the financial industry is to find a complete solution or form a closed loop, nurturing high-value innovative companies at various stages and becoming the core of new technological productivity.
Q:What key technological trends are reflected in Musk's investment track?
A:Elon Musk's investment track includes three engines: AI (represented by DeepMind, OpenAI, and ChatGPT), clean energy (such as solar energy), and brain-machine interface (represented by Neuralink). These areas represent key technological directions that may impact people's lives in the future.
Q:How can low-altitude economy become a new sample of production force?
A:The low-altitude economy is expected to achieve revolutionary breakthroughs based on artificial intelligence and new energy technologies, such as electric vertical take-off and landing aircraft (eVTOL). This requires the establishment of a complete ground-air control and security system, thereby changing the transportation mode, solving urban congestion and other problems, and becoming a new form of future three-dimensional transportation.
Q:How does the capital market reflect the growth path of great companies?
A:The capital market can reflect the development of a company through the growth of its market value. In the past 60 years, some great companies have emerged with changes in factors such as technology and energy revolution, such as hardware companies Intel and Cisco becoming the leaders of the new generation of infrastructure after the bursting of the internet bubble. In recent years, the rise of technology companies has been mainly seen, many of which have benefited from the impact of significant inventions like the Apple iPhone.
Q:How can China utilize its own advantages to develop new productive forces?
A:China should make full use of its strong production capacity, combine it with the principles of globalization, move from "me too" (import substitution) to "me better" (doing better), and ultimately achieve "me globalization". At the same time, there is a need for deep reform of the capital market, to create a new generation of high-quality companies with wage productivity, and ensure that these companies can form complete production relations and be a source of high-quality development.
Q:In the process of popularizing the computer internet, when did total factor productivity show a significant improvement? Has the global asset rate experienced a significant increase after the internet became mobile?
A:Total factor productivity saw a significant increase during the Clinton prosperity era in the late 1990s, with the rapid popularization of computers and the internet in various fields such as schools, hospitals, and factories during that time. Even though mobile phones now have internet capabilities and their functions are becoming increasingly powerful with the support of 4G and 5G networks, total factor productivity has not seen a significant improvement as a result.
Q:In this AI technology revolution, at which point in time might total factor productivity break through? Why would total factor productivity break through in the AI technology revolution?
A:According to deduction, the global asset rate variable is likely to be humanoid robots. In the next 30 years or so, as humanoid robots are widely used in daily life, production, and special fields, total factor productivity may be propelled. In this artificial intelligence technology revolution, there have been some major breakthroughs on the software side, such as generative art and tattoo music technologies. They will be widely applied in daily life and production in the future, thus improving total factor productivity.
Q:How do technologies such as self-driving cars and automated kitchens impact total factor productivity?
A:Although technologies such as self-driving cars and unmanned kitchens are advancing, their impact on total factor productivity is limited due to low popularity and lack of wide application in production and daily life.
Q:How to distinguish and apply new productivity from traditional productivity in investment? How will the development of new productivity affect changes in production relations?
A:The new productive forces correspond to major technologies, manufacturing, medicine, and other directions, while traditional productive forces include industries such as cyclicality, consumption, and finance. In secondary market investment, one can judge whether the market style tends towards new productive forces or traditional productive forces based on the macroeconomic environment, corporate profit status, and liquidity trends. The development of new productive forces will drive fundamental changes in the production relations, such as the labor force shifting from quantity dividends to quality dividends, requiring more scientists and engineers; in terms of production tools, effective methodologies need to be addressed; at the level of production relations, with the increase in automation, the future may be closer to distribution according to demand rather than the traditional distribution according to labor.
Q:What are the new productivity tracks determined by the current country?
A:The new productive forces identified by the country include eight major strategic emerging industries and nine future industries, among which humanoid robots are the ultimate track, closely related to areas such as brain-machine interfaces, new energy storage, and will have a profound impact on the future energy structure, grid construction, and other aspects.
Q:How does China face the challenge of total factor productivity accounting?
A:Currently, China cannot scientifically calculate total factor productivity, but it can observe its development status through some alternative indicators and monitoring the development process of related industries, such as the proportion of value added in new strategic industries to GDP, the percentage of sales of new products, the penetration rate of new productive products, and the utilization of data factors.
Q:What is the role of monetary policy, fiscal policy, and industrial policy in promoting the development of new productivity?
A:The monetary policy provides funding support through refinancing and ensures the health of the central bank's balance sheet; fiscal policy complements industrial policy by directly injecting funds to support the development of new productive forces; in terms of industrial policy, under the new national system, it actively guides social capital to participate in investment, while investing in high-tech fields through national big funds and local technology venture capital.
Q:From the perspective of the asset side, what impact will the full data elements of future assets have on the valuation of startup companies?
A:The complete data elements of assets owned by future scientists will be used to evaluate start-up companies. Investors may no longer be limited to equity financing, as debt financing and even credit financing may also be available. In the investment process, if the investment project (such as a scientist's research results) fails to materialize as scheduled, it is possible to extend the project by investing in other scientists, and ultimately recover the debt when everyone is a robot.
Q:From the perspective of policy meetings, what aspects reflect the importance of the artificial intelligence track?
A:From the two important conferences in 2024, it can be seen that the artificial intelligence track has received great attention and marginal changes. The Wangjing Conference emphasized the combination of artificial intelligence with various industries, or industrial intelligence, while the Third Plenum pointed out that from now until the middle of this century, artificial intelligence may be the key point in achieving the great transformation of Chinese-style modernization.
Q:What are the main problems and investment opportunities currently faced in the secondary market investment?
A:The main problem currently faced by the secondary market is the lack of profit support, but with the increase in risk appetite brought about by the policy shift at the end of September, there has been a short-term investment opportunity for small market caps in the technology sector with industrial trends as the main development direction.
Q:What are the opportunities for primary investment and long-term investment in the development of new productivity?
A:Both primary and secondary investments are brewing huge investment opportunities, such as investing in the seven major industries in the United States. Successful investments can bring returns of several thousand or even tens of thousands of times. For projects that fail to invest successfully, potential losses can be covered by other potential investment projects. Therefore, developing new productive forces is China's inevitable choice and will become a core track that investors need to pay attention to in the current international environment.
Q:How to view the development of new productive forces under the background of the new era, especially during the stage of high-quality development of the Chinese economy?
A:The new era is an important stage division, and the Chinese economy has shifted from a stage of high-speed growth to a stage of high-quality development. The report of the 20th Party Congress proposed a two-step approach to achieve the goal of 2050, with the first step being to basically achieve new industrialization by 2035, and building a manufacturing powerhouse is an important indicator of modernization. In addition, China is forming institutional advantages through centralized governance and strategic planning, promoting the development of frontier technologies such as AI, in order to build a modern industrial system and lead the development of new productive forces.
Q:At the recently held State Council Information Office press conference, Chief Li Chao emphasized which direction as an important area for future development?
A:Chief Li Chao emphasized that humanoid robots are an important direction for future development, which was specifically mentioned at the press conference on July 5th.
Q:What is the impact of Minister Miao and Minister Wan Gang on the development of the Chinese automotive industry?
A:Minister Miao and Minister Wan have worked tirelessly for more than a decade to promote China's automotive industry to become a pillar industry and to surpass the rest of the world. Particularly, the production of new energy vehicles has reached 30 million units, making China the global leader in this sector last year.
Q:What is the current market value ranking of new energy vehicles in the market?
A:Currently in the new energy vehicle industry, Tesla is the top in market value, followed by Toyota. The third largest market value is Xiaomi, which entered the industry last year after Lei Jun's entry, and its market value has surpassed BYD, ranking third.
Q:What is the importance of the regulations on autonomous driving vehicles in Beijing?
A:Beijing, as a center for technological innovation, its release of regulations on autonomous driving vehicles is of great significance, reflecting the importance placed on arrangements and deployments related to technological innovation and industrial development.
Q:What are your views on the development of the private economy and what policy suggestions do you have in relation to this?
A:It is believed that private economy is crucial to the Chinese economy. The enactment of the Private Economy Promotion Law is imminent, aiming to promote the development of the private economy from the aspects of legal governance, policy, and working mechanisms, providing more opportunities and space.
Q:How does PetroChina understand the new productivity?
A:PetroChina believes that the new productivity is not only reflected in the manufacturing industry, but also in the transformation and upgrading of traditional energy industries. For example, through the comprehensive energy company model to develop new energy resources such as shale oil, oil shale, and shale gas, as well as promote the application and development of low-carbon energy such as solar energy, geothermal energy, wind energy, etc.
Q:In your opinion, in which aspects are the new productivity mainly reflected? What is your opinion on the role of new productivity in the Chinese economy?
A:The new productivity is reflected in three aspects. Firstly, from the perspective of innovation, it requires disruptive innovation, which is often placed in future industries. Secondly, high-quality development, which focuses on the quality of high-quality development, is consistent with the concept of high-quality development mentioned earlier. Finally, the key to improving productivity lies in improving total factor productivity, especially in the search for new dividends, finding ways and channels to enhance or maintain economic growth. In the current background of China's economic slowdown, new productivity is the important entry point and direction to promote economic growth. At the same time, the capital market is very concerned about such new things, as they have strong explosive power from 0 to 1, can attract a large amount of capital attention, and generate opportunities to grow from small to large. However, the successful transformation of small businesses into large businesses is a major challenge facing the investment market, which is a major opportunity and challenge for the future development of the Chinese economy and the exploration of the investment market.
Q:How do you view the impact of the current technological revolution on productivity?
A:I believe that the ongoing technological revolution, represented by artificial intelligence AI, may have a greater impact than previous revolutions such as the steam engine, electricity, and the internet. This cycle of technological revolution is strong, allowing American tech giants to maintain their strength in a rising interest rate environment. We are currently in a very good period of opportunity for the technology industry revolution.
Q:How can the new productivity be connected to the people's good life?
A:The new productivity is more reflected in the supply-side reform, which can improve people's quality of life by providing new applications such as smart cars, low-altitude economy, humanoid robots, etc., thus achieving the combination of economic uplift and a better life.
Q:How to integrate the new productivity with manufacturing industry and maintain the advantages of high-end manufacturing industry?
A:The manufacturing industry in China has strong global competitiveness, and the integration of new productivity into the manufacturing industry helps to maintain and enhance this advantage. For example, in the field of new energy vehicles and smart driving, China already has a strong industrial chain foundation and innovative speed. Although there are weaknesses in core materials, components, etc., the country has paid high attention and increased investment in research and development. With the improvement of the industrial chain and innovation iteration, it is expected to gradually catch up with the international advanced level.
Q:Dr. Xu, how do you understand China's new productivity, and from which industries can breakthroughs be relatively easily achieved?
A:The new core of productivity in China lies in innovation, with industry as its carrier and enterprises as its implementers. From the perspective of industries, it can be divided into three aspects: first, the transformation or reconstruction of traditional industries, such as using new technologies like AI and artificial intelligence to transform the oil and petrochemical industry and the power system; second, the rapid development of emerging industries such as new energy and new energy vehicles; and third, future industries, which are disruptive fields from 0 to 1, requiring the use of disruptive technologies and scientific discoveries to drive forward.
Q:What opportunities do you see in terms of AI artificial intelligence in specific industries?
A:I believe that the implementation of AI in end applications will become an important trend in the next 5 years, especially in new service areas, bringing new high value-added service opportunities. In addition, intelligent driving is also a huge opportunity, especially in the field of new energy vehicles. Chinese automotive companies are committed to combining technological development with the good life of the people, taking convenience and comfort needs into consideration, forming strong competitiveness with a people-oriented approach.
Q:What is the view on the two future ubiquitous technologies of AI and biomanufacturing?
A:AI and biomanufacturing are key technologies that trigger social change, and their combination may bring about revolutionary changes. Although there is more emphasis on AI domestically, the field of biotechnology is also worth paying attention to. As investors, one should pay full attention to the driving role of these two technologies in future development.
Q:What role does capital play in the development of new productive forces, and how does middle-tier capital operate in this regard? When investing in technology companies, what does middle-tier capital primarily value?
A:Capital is crucial for the development of new productive forces and is one of the necessary conditions. Midstream capital (using CNPC Capital as an example) has made significant investments in the field of new productive forces, closely following market trends. They utilize favorable conditions such as the development of capital markets, mature entrepreneurial teams, and the release of technological dividends to actively participate in investments, and support technological innovation through diversified financial services. For example, in addition to its own research and development team, CNPC collaborates with social forces to jointly conduct research and development, leveraging the advantages of the industrial chain to drive overall development. When investing in technology companies, CNPC Capital values both the technology itself and the entrepreneurial team. They believe that as long as the technology is reliable, the team is dependable, and can solve practical problems, even scientists can become investment targets. By linking with the industry, CNPC Capital can provide ready-made market demand, helping companies achieve commercialization transformation faster.
Q:From the perspective of public funds, how do you view the development of the capital market serving new productivity?
A:Publicly offered funds mainly invest in the secondary market, participating in the investment of technology companies such as the Science and Technology Innovation Board and Hong Kong stocks. However, for a large number of emerging productivity companies, capital investment in the primary market is more important. Policies encourage early investment, small-scale investment, and investment in new fields. Industrial capital has unique advantages in this context and can accelerate the application of new technologies and the integration of production and finance through strategic investment, thereby improving overall conversion efficiency.
Q:In the context of the new round of technological revolution, what changes will occur in the Chinese capital market, and what opportunities should investors seize?
A:With this current round of technological revolution and the strong expectations of the country for new productive forces, significant changes will occur in the Chinese capital market. Investors should first demonstrate greater determination to fully invest in areas such as AI and 5G, the new universal productive forces. Secondly, pay attention to competitive opportunities in the competition and cooperation between China and the United States, especially breakthroughs in emerging industries. Lastly, seize policy opportunities such as the Science and Technology Innovation Board, actively layout strategic directions for new technological applications.
Q:In your opinion, what is the biggest investment opportunity in the combination of hard technology and high-end manufacturing between China and the United States?
A:The greatest investment opportunities come from the combination of advantages from both China and the United States, such as Tesla's Gigafactory settling in China, which reflects the combination of China's high-end manufacturing capabilities and efficiency with the advantages in software and other aspects from the United States.
Q:What are the new investment directions and targets for investors in the current AI revolution?
A:In this round of AI revolution, investment directions are more diverse than the previous round. From the perspective of the semiconductor industry chain, there are not only downstream packaging and testing, but also more segmented areas such as optical modules, computing power, data center-related equipment, and liquid cooling technology. With the development of productivity, the investment targets of A-share investors are also becoming more diversified. Some start-up technology companies on the science and technology innovation board have entered the profit-making stage after several years of investment.
Q:How will the A-share market change with the emergence of new productivity?
A:The A-share market will gradually transition from primarily playing the role of a voting machine (reflecting trust and distrust) to that of a weighing machine, more accurately reflecting the actual operation of the economy. In 2025, facing many opportunities, including pricing changes related to Trump's new policies, Musk's influence, and adjustments in the Chinese economy, there may be expected reversals and discrepancies, bringing uncertainties and opportunities to the market.
Q:What impact does the relationship between China and the United States (G2) have on the future capital markets?
A:G2 is a dynamic game process where both sides are important variables in each other's decision-making. For example, during the waiting period for signals on the new US government policy, the Chinese market may experience situations of overpricing or underpricing, creating great opportunities for the capital market in this turbulent and intertwined state. At the same time, it is important for China to conduct in-depth analysis of the intentions behind US policies and be prepared to make dynamic adjustments to their strategies.
Q:What is the reaction and expected adjustment of the Chinese market to Trump's election as president?
A:The market has seen a significant shift in China's policy towards the United States, from the Biden administration's turnover to the Trump administration. The two countries' differences in values and ideologies have become more pronounced, which may lead to a repositioning of the decoupling process between the US and China over the past four years. The market is cautious about whether Trump can successfully implement his promised reforms, but this also suggests the possibility of significant market opportunities emerging.
Q:Is the global values camp built by the Biden administration over the past four years to contain China now disintegrating?
A:Yes, the containment camp constructed by American deep government political elites such as Biden, Blinken, and Sullivan to counter China's values seems to be gradually unraveling. Specifically, this is shown by unusual changes in China's interactions with countries like Japan and South Korea.
Q:What are the underlying reasons for the recent strengthening of the US dollar and the economic situation in Europe?
A:The strengthening of the US dollar is not mainly determined by the relationships between major Eastern countries such as China and Japan, but rather by the US intensifying its economic exploitation of Europe. The recent weakness of European currencies like the euro, Europe as a whole in a difficult situation, and the worsening situation in Ukraine may all reflect the United States pushing Europe towards right-wing forces, which aligns with American values and interests.
Q:How will changes in geopolitics affect China's external conditions in the future?
A:With the deep-seated changes in geopolitics after November 5th, Europe is moving to the right while the United States is turning inward. This indicates that China's external conditions may face a huge window of change, potentially creating the possibility for a deal to be reached between China and the United States.
Q:How do current economic and international policy developments in the United States affect the global market?
A:The United States is currently in a state of infighting, seeking deals with China to support its internal conflicts. The costs of this infighting are being released in the form of intensified inflation, and the US economy is also facing pressure of recession, especially as AI application penetration encounters resistance, signaling a critical turning point in the reshuffling of interests as the scientific and technological revolution progresses.
Q:What is the value positioning of Bitcoin in the current situation?
A:Bitcoin, as a dollar-denominated asset, its value symbolizes opposition to traditional government and political operating models (i.e. authoritarianism, centralization). If Deng Wang and Xiao Maguo's political reforms progress smoothly, Bitcoin's value space will have unlimited potential for expansion; on the contrary, if setbacks are encountered, it will release significant volatility.
Q:How to view the current problem of economic imbalance in China and its solutions?
A:The root cause of China's economic imbalance issue is essentially a necessary adjustment in the process of Chinese-style modernization, which requires resolving the core conflict between central and local governments. Once this key issue is addressed, the state of China's economic imbalance will fundamentally improve. As for the issue of the Renminbi exchange rate, due to factors such as market incompleteness and control, the Renminbi operates under a managed floating exchange rate system, with pricing autonomy and stability. In the long term, it may fluctuate within a certain range.
Q:Regarding the future pricing of the Chinese A-share market, what factors do you believe will have the most influence? Why is China's supply chain able to remain stable and difficult to replace on a global scale?
A:I believe that in the foreseeable future, the pricing of China's A-share market will no longer mainly depend on the numerator (such as the company's profitability and ROE), but on the denominator, that is, how we effectively respond to the systematic risk in the right side of the Kangbo stage, and continually resolve these risks to enhance market risk preference. This is because China has a complete and efficient industrial system, and the supply of electricity as a basic energy source is extremely stable and abundant, which is difficult for other countries to replicate. In addition, China's advantages in human resources, high labor intensity, and the government's open attitude towards capital outflow policies are all supply-side factors that support stable supply chains.
Q:What are the important aspects to watch for in the A-share market next year?
A:There are many uncertainties in the A-share market next year, such as the impact of US-China relations on China's policy. In addition, changes at the policy level, the high-quality population driving China's modernization, long-term strategic breakthroughs in technology innovation (such as Musk's projects), will all have a significant impact on the market. 2025 will bring huge expected differences and reversal opportunities.
Q:Why hasn't the market priced in China's policy of expanding domestic demand?
A:Mainly because the market is currently in a bear market phase, investors are more cautious and are hoping to see clear and definitive policy signals. However, the comprehensive policy of expanding domestic demand proposed at the Central Economic Work Conference has not been fully digested and priced by the market yet.
Q:What market changes does the recent rapid decline in Chinese government bond yields reflect?
A:The rapid decline in China's ten-year government bond yield indicates that the market has fundamentally changed its outlook on economic growth prospects and future inflation expectations. This signals the arrival of a new major cyclical turning point, while also revealing potential opportunities that may emerge in the future market, such as good investment opportunities in sectors like small and medium-sized stocks following events like quantitative easing.
Q:In the market, which asset categories are most sensitive to political events, such as the US presidential election? What actions might Trump take after coming into office, and what impact will it have on the market?
A:For political events such as the U.S. presidential election, the exchange rate is one of the most sensitive asset categories, especially the exchange rates of large countries with trade relations with the United States, because the exchange rate reflects the relative price relationship between the currencies of the two countries, and its implied volatility will sharply increase when political events occur. The easiest policy that Trump can implement after taking office is the tariff policy, as he can sign tariff measures through executive orders. In addition, during his term, the United States has taken a series of trade sanctions and embargo measures against China. These policy changes may lead to an increase in the market's implied volatility, triggering policy responses. If tariffs exceed expectations, policy responses may also exceed expectations, which will create opportunities for market investment deployment.
Q:On which dates did the market implied volatility experience a sharp increase, and later present investment opportunities?
A:During the 2016 US presidential election, the market's implied volatility surged significantly, followed by a significant increase in the US stock market; in March 2020, when the COVID-19 pandemic broke out, the market's implied volatility reached high levels again. After the Federal Reserve took measures to rescue the market, the US stock market also experienced a significant rebound; in October 2008, when Lehman Brothers collapsed and triggered the financial crisis, the market's implied volatility surged. However, after China announced a 4 trillion yuan stimulus plan, the market also began to recover.
Q:How should we deal with the technological wave of progress in AI, especially the impact of AI on the global economy?
A:The advancement of AI technology will bring about revolutionary economic growth, but its development also follows economic cyclical patterns. Currently, we should follow these cyclical patterns and conduct trades with risk control measures in place. Despite the strong performance of the U.S. stock market, we should be cautious of speculative activities that are disconnected from the economic fundamentals, and patiently wait while seeking suitable trading opportunities.
Q:How is the situation of the Chinese stock market? Has the price-earnings ratio returned to above historical averages, and what is the relationship between the 10-year government bond yield and the price-earnings ratio?
A:The price-earnings ratio of the Shanghai Stock Exchange has returned to above the historical average after a recent rebound, while the 10-year government bond yield and the price-earnings ratio are showing a deviation state, which is usually a rare investment opportunity. At the same time, the Chinese economy is in the stage of cyclical recovery, but due to the drag of the real estate market, the economic recovery process is relatively bumpy.
Q:Which asset classes perform best in 2024?
A:In 2024, Chinese stocks in the Hong Kong market, priced in US dollars, were one of the best-performing asset classes globally. Chinese government bonds also performed well on a global scale. Additionally, due to the large purchases of gold by the People's Bank of China and the depreciation of the renminbi exchange rate, gold priced in renminbi also became one of the best-performing asset classes.
Q:Can you please share the specific content of the top ten economic and capital market predictions for the year 2025?
A:My top ten predictions for 2025 mainly include: the slowing down of the economic growth in Europe and America, with the possibility of the Federal Reserve lowering interest rates 3 to 4 times; the Renminbi appreciating due to a decrease in the US dollar index; the risk of a peak in the US stock market; strengthening of domestic growth stabilization policies, with a GDP target set at around 5%; a shift of household savings towards the capital market, bringing incremental funds to A-shares; further policy support in the real estate market to achieve stabilization after a decline; further easing of monetary policy, with fiscal policy playing a more critical role, including increasing debt to drive investment and consumer spending; a shift in market style from speculative stocks to high-quality leading stocks; the long-term upward trend of international gold prices remains unchanged, suggesting the allocation of assets in gold-related assets.
Q:What are your key views on market trends and investment opportunities for 2025?
A:In 2025, there will be discrepancies and historical divergences in multiple markets, such as the deviation between the Shenzhen Stock Exchange Price-Earnings Ratio and the ten-year national bond yield, the deviation between the US S&P cycle and the semiconductor cycle, and the uncertainty of tariffs reflected in various indicators. This will bring more trading opportunities for prepared investors. At the same time, it is expected that policies will continue to be strengthened, with the central bank possibly lowering reserve ratios and interest rates at opportune times, and fiscal policy may also introduce policies that exceed expectations.
Q:What are the policy expectations for the real estate market in 2025?
A:In 2025, the restrictions on property sales in the real estate market will be gradually lifted, and the country will introduce substantial policies to support the development of the real estate industry in order to achieve overall stabilization. The importance of the real estate industry as a pillar industry of the national economy means that its stability is crucial for many other industries, so policies in the real estate sector will be further strengthened.
Q:For mainstream assets in 2025, what is the approximate order of the expected return rates in people's minds among stocks, bonds, and commodities? What is your ranking of the expected returns on mainstream assets in 2025?
A:I think my ranking is stocks first, then commodities may have some opportunities, and finally bonds. I believe all three asset classes have some opportunities, but because the absolute return of bonds is currently too low and duration risk is increasing, the requirements for the bond market in 2025 may be higher. Next year, I agree with Hong Bin on being optimistic about stocks. Secondly, I am more bullish on gold because the category of commodities is complex, and at the current stage, being bullish on black commodities may have a little risk. Therefore, I will not comment further on commodities. I believe it may be a time to withdraw while trading on the edge.
Q:How do you view the ranking of stocks, bonds, and commodities in 2025?
A:Looking at the year from the beginning, it is difficult to rank these three assets now because there are many variables and uncertainties at the macro-level in 2025. It is unlikely to have particularly large trend opportunities, and there may be more of a pattern of fluctuations.
Q:What is your order?
A:I think bonds are currently more certain, although I also like stocks, but may need to wait for some signals to appear. As for commodities, I think it is a differentiated market, with some varieties being bullish and others may have problems, such as black metals.
Q:In terms of investment research attention, where do you think more focus should be placed on assets in 2025?
A:Based on my judgment, in 2025, we should focus more on commodities, as the volatility of most commodity varieties in the past three years has gradually converged and is now in a historically low volatility state. I believe that 2025 may be an important year for layout in the commodity sector.
Q:What is your outlook on the stock market's logic and how do you seize investment opportunities?
A:The political bureau meeting emphasized the need to introduce a proactive fiscal policy and a more accommodative monetary policy to address the new problems and challenges facing the economy. Historically, the stock market has typically responded positively after the central government has implemented an accommodative monetary policy and expansionary fiscal policy. Additionally, it is important to understand the time lag between market expectations and the actual implementation of policies, as the market may reflect expectations before the policies are fully implemented. Furthermore, the current decline in interest rates is also a positive sign.
Q:What impact does a decrease in interest rates have on the stock market?
A:A decrease in interest rates means a decrease in risk-free returns, which will encourage funds to flow from low-risk products such as bonds to the stock market, as stocks are seen as having more growth potential compared to bonds. When interest rates are almost at zero, investors are unable to obtain stable returns in low-risk products such as government bonds, so they turn to stocks in pursuit of higher returns. Therefore, in a background of declining interest rates, the stock market may present a relatively certain investment opportunity, especially in high dividend yield assets.
Q:What are the definite investment opportunities in the A-share market?
A:In the A-share market, there are mainly two types of investment opportunities: one is high dividend stocks, with the demand for these assets increasing due to the decline in interest rates; the other is in the technology sector, especially in areas like artificial intelligence, chips, and robotics. The central government's high-quality development strategy has promoted rapid growth in these areas, and it is expected that there will be a breakthrough in the next few years.
Q:Why do high dividend stocks become a certain investment opportunity? What are the predictions for the performance of the A-share market in 2025?
A:After the interest rate drops, Chinese people, institutions, and social security funds need to find stable and secure investment returns on a large scale. They tend to purchase assets such as highways, hydropower, gas, large banks, etc., which can provide stable dividend income. With the decline in interest rates, these funds find it difficult to find investment targets that meet their requirements, thereby increasing the demand for high-dividend stocks and forming a relatively certain investment opportunity. It is expected that the A-share market will present a dumbbell-shaped trend by 2025, with one end being high dividend assets and the other end being technology innovation assets, especially in the field of artificial intelligence, robotics, etc. Although the specific time and points cannot be accurately predicted, it can be confirmed that these two directions will be the main opportunities in the market.
Q:How do you view the performance of the A-share market in January and the opportunities ahead?
A:In history, the success rate of the A-share market in January was relatively low, while it was higher in February. Despite recent market volatility, a large amount of capital from insurance funds and other sources entered the market at the beginning of the year, possibly first allocating to stable high-dividend stocks. In addition, looking ahead to the future market trend, there is optimism for investment opportunities brought by the gradual implementation of policies, as well as the investment value that may emerge in certain sectors due to a decline in prices.
Q:In a one-year time frame, how do you view the allocation sequence of stocks and bonds as asset classes?
A:I believe that bonds may come before, accelerating from December last year, while stocks may come after. When judging the slope of the recovery, I feel that bonds come first and stocks come after.
Q:What is your opinion on the change trend of M2 year-on-year growth rate based on which data?
A:The year-on-year growth rate of M2 fell from its peak in February 2023 to 6.8% in September 2024, a process that lasted for about a year and a half. Referring to the example of Japan in the 1990s, it also experienced adjustments during a similar time period. I believe that the year-on-year growth rate of M2 should now stabilize and avoid further decline.
Q:What impact do inflation and the rate cuts by the Federal Reserve have on the domestic A-share market in the United States?
A:According to our internal judgment, the probability of the Fed cutting interest rates this year is relatively low. This means that even if the US cuts interest rates, the possibility of A-shares following suit is relatively small. If we were to cut interest rates, the exchange rate would give up some space accordingly, while the stability of bank interest rate spreads and liabilities would also be considered. This could lead to a balance between the extent of interest rate cuts and exchange rate policies, thereby affecting a significant decline in the reserve requirement ratio.
Q:How will the decline in bond yields affect the stock market?
A:When bond yields decline, the two directions that benefit in the stock market are dividend assets (such as the coal and power sectors in recent years and the banking sector this year) and valuation improvement due to declining interest rates (such as the technology sector).
Q:What specific opinions do you have on the stock and bond allocation?
A:I believe that liquidity release is beneficial for stocks, but in the allocation of stocks and bonds, stocks should be treated as allocation assets rather than relying solely on liquidity release for short-term operations. The annualized return and volatility data of indexes such as the CSI 300 show that the allocation of stocks and bonds needs to address the issue of asymmetric risk-return ratios.
Q:How to view the strategy of participating in the stock market in the current volatile market?
A:In a volatile market, the appropriate strategy is to play defense and counterattack. First, make sure your investments are in a safe position. As the market fluctuates greatly, opportunities often arise during downturns. At the same time, pay attention to real dividends and real innovative assets, and avoid the risks brought by fake dividends and speculative hype.
Q:In terms of the bond market, what investment advice do you have in the current interest rate environment?
A:The current bond market is relatively strong, and it is recommended to buy on dips. From historical data, there is a relatively stable ratio relationship between the ten-year long bond and nominal GDP, which can be used as a reference benchmark for allocating ten-year long bonds. In addition, a key factor in quickly adjusting the bond market is the central bank using monetary policy tools (such as shifting from MLF to OMO) to quickly bring interest rates down, leading to corresponding adjustments in bond prices.
Q:After Japan and the United States' 10-year and 30-year bond yields broke the 2% mark in 2012 and 1998, how did their trends differ?
A:After Japan broke through the 2 level, there was a rebound for about a quarter, but it quickly fell back to a low point, while in the United States, after the implementation of the third round of QE, the ten-year long bond yields briefly touched 1.5 before quickly rising again.
Q:In the future, is China more likely to trend towards Japan or the United States?
A:This is a point of discussion because Japan has rebounded after buying bonds from the central bank, while the U.S. has kept debt repayment rates at a high level through QE.
Q:When ordinary investors choose bond products, how can they seize bond opportunities? What kind of bond products would you recommend for ordinary investors?
A:For ordinary investors, choosing bond products can be difficult, especially considering the market conditions in 2025. However, research from a global sample has found that when there is a negative interest rate signal in an economy, it usually goes through a process of expanding fiscal policy leading to a rise in interest rates.
Given the potential changes in interest rates and policies, I would not recommend long-term holding of a 30-year government bond ETF, as the bond market may pose significant risks once the government implements expansionary fiscal policy. Therefore, I am more inclined to recommend short-term bond products.
Q:How do you view investment in commodities, especially the performance of gold and silver?
A:Optimistic about the commodity sector, especially precious metals. It is expected that the volatility in the next few years will increase, potentially entering a high volatility period.
Q:Do you agree with Teacher Liang's positive outlook on the crude oil market?
A:I agree with Teacher Liang's opinion, and I am especially optimistic about the crude oil market. The current tense situation in the Middle East may affect the supply of crude oil and push up prices. At the same time, the unfavorable global economic outlook and the actions of oil-exporting countries also indicate opportunities in the crude oil market.
Q:What advice do you have for asset allocation in 2025?
A:Suggestion to adopt a balanced allocation, focusing on bonds, stocks, and real estate under the logic of monetary easing, and adjusting asset allocation according to interest rate changes. When interest rates fall, seize the opportunity for various asset values to stand out.

中国首席经济学家论坛
Follow